ad: Amateur-1

Loop On Ground Antenna

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by KD5W, Jul 18, 2021.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: Left-2
ad: L-MFJ
ad: HRDLLC-2
ad: Left-3
ad: MessiPaoloni-1
ad: abrind-2
ad: L-Geochron
  1. AA4MB

    AA4MB XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Yet: "DXpedition ops have told me Im often 10 dB+ above the pileups and Im in the log on the first call." It's hard not to believe all the modeling software and such - but real world results seem to have given KM1H's inverted vee the nod for long distance as well.
     
    M1WML and UT7UX like this.
  2. KM1H

    KM1H Ham Member QRZ Page

    Modeling software doesnt take ducts or various propagation related path distortions into consideration. A duct has low attenuation no matter what band including VHF/UHF.

    Several thought I was running 10KW or more and several YCCC members showed up unexpectedly over the years to catch me at it.
     
    M1WML likes this.
  3. KA0HCP

    KA0HCP XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Antenna modeling software is not intended to take ANY propagation into consideration.
     
    M1WML, UT7UX, MW1CFN and 1 other person like this.
  4. KM1H

    KM1H Ham Member QRZ Page


    I have no idea what the VSWR is, the wire was cut to formula, fed in the center with coax and the amp pi network was tweaked to work into it. I do not believe in external antenna tuners when the amps pi network is already an impedance matching device. Additional feedline loss on 160 was ignored.
     
    M1WML and UT7UX like this.
  5. KM1H

    KM1H Ham Member QRZ Page


    No kidding but some act as if it is the last word.
     
    N1IPU, M1WML and MW1CFN like this.
  6. KA0HCP

    KA0HCP XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    It IS the last word in describing how an antenna performs i.e. pattern and gain.

    Input the figures from the antenna modeling software into a Propagation Modeler for propagation estimating.
     
    M1WML likes this.
  7. KM1H

    KM1H Ham Member QRZ Page

    Only when the physical location agrees with the software assumptions. You can import/export all sorts of things to better understand a particular situation but I have no interest in counting leaves or raindrops for 160M.

    Build it and use it with a minimum of fuss.
    KISS
     
    N1IPU, M1WML and WN1MB like this.
  8. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    One should never keep one's mind so open that your brains fall out.

    The LOG is a poor antenna. It is a poor antenna because it is placed in the extreme nearfield of lossy ground, which invokes the transmission line effect and thereby produces substantial phase canceIlation.

    That is not a question of being open or closed minded, It is a physical explanation as to why the performance is poor.

    Have a great day:)

    73
    Chip W1YW
     
    KR3DX, M1WML and AD5HR like this.
  9. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    1) that company is out of business;

    2) The cited patent---US 4825224-- actually states that the efficiency of the antenna will be poor and recommends increasing performance by RAISING the ELPA (Eyring) ANTENNA OFF THE GROUND-- by means of stakes. Even shows a figure to represent that.

    Read the patent to see for yourself.

    Why did they recommend 'raising the antenna off the ground'? Because that diminishes the transmission line effect's phase cancellation, thereby enhancing the efficiency.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2021
    M1WML likes this.
  10. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    I found the assertion (by the Brit here) that my--alleged-- "narrowness of mind puts the U.S. to shame" a better attempt at insult.

    Sorry.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2021
    M1WML likes this.

Share This Page