QRZ Now Accepts LoTW Confirmations in QRZ Logbook

I really didn't think this would happen that fast when I brought it up in the first thread announcing the QRZ logbook awards. Nice to see it done so quickly.

 

Now how about adding eQSL.cc ?

 

Does it still need my password for LoTW?

 

Thank you, thank you, thank you, worked flawlessly for me. Many thanks.

 

It needs the same password as the one you use when you log in on the main lotw site page.

 

I'd guess only when eqsl goes the route of blind matching.

 

I don't use LoTW but use QRZ. How about the other way around?

 

Yay thank you so much for this feature!!!!!! It gives me my second award

 

Added another 6000 Q's. Please all LOTW users, upload your logs!!!!

 

Wow, after jumping thru the short hoops to interface my LOTW tQSL with QRZ logbook my numbers changed.

The online directions with photos helped even me to get it to work.


QSO's: 21256 Confirmed: 4095 Countries: 240

QSO's: 21398 Confirmed: 11919 Countries: 240

Thanks again to all who worked so hard at QRZ.com.

73 K2HAT Lee

 

Around 1 or 2 years ago, eQSL did switch over to a more strict eQSL manual confirmation by making their members type in the Time, instead of just clicking on the green check mark to confirm. It was very annoying to me. So, I got the logging program Log4OM and started upload ADIF to eQSL, just like on QRZ Logbook and the .TQ8 files to LoTW. Anyway, eQSL has took a step to make their eQSL confirmation system more secure. Before they did this, I confirmed around 25,000 QSOs on eQSL manually and it always seemed plenty secure to me, anyway. Of course, I guess it has always been possible for two stations to get together via email or even on the air and for lack of a better word "cheat", no matter what type of security system (LoTW TrustedQSL lock and key .TQ8 certificate, QRZ Logbook double blind ADIF upload) The point I am making is it would be a good idea for QRZ Logbook to also accept onfirmations from eQSL just like they have LoTW. As a QRZ Logbook user, Ham member and XML subscriber I would like to see QRZ Logbook accept eQSL confirmations. Not that is it really all that important to me but I do know there are a lot of Amateur radio operators who use eQSL and do not use LoTW or QRZ Logbook because of the difficulty of uploading ADIF and/or .TQ8 files. Yes, eQSL can still be used manually if they have the patience ot type in the Time.

73 KC4TVZ Todd

 

Great!! THAT worked fine!! I am now qualified for all 4 QRZed awards, (Though I had to upgrade to an XML subscriber to get LOTW to download the QSOs), but that is fine. Maybe I can use the XML somehow, though I do very little Electronic logging. I need to research what the XML gives me. But I am happy to support QRZed, since QRZed is my WHOLE LIFE!!

 

Thanks for the feature! Now if LoTW will actually not take forever to process my latest upload that I did about an hour ago. What is the ARRL using for their server(s) for processing QSO records, old P4-based machines?

 

Same here. Anybody have any information on this?