ad: HamHats-1

6 meter 50mhz FT-8 HF Digital Mode

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by KJ4YZI, Aug 4, 2017.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: Left-2
ad: abrind-2
ad: Left-3
ad: Radclub22-2
ad: L-MFJ
  1. KJ4YZI

    KJ4YZI Ham Member QRZ Page

    Title says HF, but I meant "DIGITAL MODE" which can be used on 6 meters as well as HF.
    At the time of this video, the solar index chart on QRZ shows poor band conditions across the board, high noise level, but I have very strong signals rolling in on FT-8 at 9:23pm in Florida.

    Has FT-8 taken over the 6 meter band? Check out this short video.


    SUBSCRIBE to HamRadioConcepts and COMMENT!!!
     

    Attached Files:

    • 2.jpg
      2.jpg
      File size:
      4.8 KB
      Views:
      570
    K0PIR likes this.
  2. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    Guys... MHZ.

    Not MILLIHERTZ (mHz)

    :)
     
    WU8Y and K6CLS like this.
  3. K3XR

    K3XR Ham Member QRZ Page

    WU8Y likes this.
  4. KD4MOJ

    KD4MOJ Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    Here is 6 a few minutes ago... mostly FT8!

    upload_2017-8-4_13-24-4.png

    ...DOUG
    KD4MOJ
     
    K0PIR likes this.
  5. AK5B

    AK5B XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Yes, unfortunately the digital modes have taken over six meters recently. 50.125 and the usual phone frequencies are fast becoming a ghost town of sorts.

    I hope that the novelty of easy dx with silent "computer-to-computer qsos" wears off sooner than later so us old diehards can enjoy more real ham-to-ham qsos again.

    No 73 to the digital crowd from me!

    ---Jeff

    Proudly deplorable phone op in EL18 (that's a fairly rare grid for 6m)
     
    W3TWG, VK6APZ/SK2022, K0UJX and 6 others like this.
  6. K5RCD

    K5RCD XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Nothing unfortunate about it.
    Digital modes are not effecting your phone QSOs at all.
    Just making use of otherwise dead bands.
     
    W7UV, N0GB, G1DFT and 4 others like this.
  7. AK5B

    AK5B XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Oh, but they are affecting my phone QSOs as well as everyone else's non-digital QSOs---they harken many (especially new) operators further up and away from our trusty watering holes so that far fewer possible contacts are now being made. For a band that is already sparsely populated to begin with it narrows our possibilities tremendously. The small herd is thinning further every day.

    The propagation maps that spot QSOs have now become misleading since most of those digital spots would not be possible if all the qsos plotted had to be able to be copied by the human ear as well.

    This affects how I now operate and is discouraging to us that wish to actually converse with our fellow six meter enthusiasts.

    That, sir is very unfortunate in my book.
     
    K3SX, VE3EEI, K6JJR and 1 other person like this.
  8. K5RCD

    K5RCD XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Those stinkin' horseless carriages scaring your horse & buggy ? :)

    [​IMG]
     
    AA7UN, N0GB, G1DFT and 2 others like this.
  9. AK5B

    AK5B XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Yes, they are. Binary codes may break my band but words will never hurt me (or my ears).
     
  10. KJ4YZI

    KJ4YZI Ham Member QRZ Page

    Where and when did I say Millihertz? And what is a millihertz anyhow?
     
  11. KJ4YZI

    KJ4YZI Ham Member QRZ Page

     
  12. K3XR

    K3XR Ham Member QRZ Page

    You need to go back and read the replies I never mentioned the word "millihertz" was merely giving the correct abbreviation for megahertz would had not taken place in the thread up to my post.
     
  13. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    Title is 'mhz.'. That's milli-hertz.

    Ouch!
     
    WU8Y and NV2K like this.
  14. KJ4YZI

    KJ4YZI Ham Member QRZ Page

    Unreal... You mean i missed the capital M.... HAHAHA...
     
  15. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    Yes.

    Only off by a billion...
     
    WU8Y, AK5B, K0PIR and 1 other person like this.

Share This Page

ad: Retevis-1