ad: CQMM-1

Vanity processing may resume soon

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by Guest, Jan 8, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: abrind-2
ad: Radclub22-2
ad: Left-2
ad: Left-3
ad: L-MFJ
  1. Guest

    Guest Guest

    From the ARRL...



    Vanity call sign processing--an unintentional anthrax scare
    victim--may soon resume. The FCC has not processed any vanity call
    sign applications--paper or electronic--since October 14. Vanity
    applications received after that date remain on hold, although all
    vanity fees have been collected.



    The vanity gridlock got started after mail received between October
    15 and November 1 was diverted from the FCC's Gettysburg,
    Pennsylvania, office for decontamination in the Washington, DC,
    area. That mail, believed to contain more than 100 vanity
    applications filed on paper, has not been returned to Gettysburg.
    Current FCC policy says that paper and electronic vanity
    applications get equal processing priority, so the Commission halted
    vanity processing altogether until it could resolve the mail snafu.



    FCC staffers in Gettysburg have been attempting to work around the
    roadblock. Using vanity fee payment data from the FCC's fiscal
    agent, Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh, the Licensing and Technical
    Analysis Branch of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau in
    Gettysburg has been contacting applicants directly to have them
    resubmit their applications.



    The FCC now is asking applicants whose paper vanity filings may have
    arrived at Mellon Bank between October 15 and November 1 and who
    have not been contacted to get in touch with the FCC to find out if
    they need to forward a copy or facsimile of their original
    paperwork. The request affects only vanity applicants who filed on
    paper--not electronic filers.



    Before contacting the FCC, however, applicants were being asked to
    check the Universal Licensing System to see if their applications
    are already on file with the FCC (under ''SEARCH,'' click
    ''Applications,'' click ''Continue,'' enter present call sign in the
    ''Call Sign'' field, and press the Enter key or click ''Search''--at the
    bottom of the page. Click on the underlined number, if any, under
    ''File Number'' to view an application). If an application already is
    on file, no further action is required.



    If no application is on file, or if no Web access is available,
    applicants should telephone the FCC Call Center, toll-free
    888-225-5322; e-mail rtaylor@fcc.gov or fax 717-338-2696.



    The Licensing Division believes it now has all paper applications
    received October 15, 2001, in hand, and it could process all
    applications received on that date as soon as this week. The FCC has
    a record of when it received the paper vanity applications, and all
    submittals will be processed in chronological order.



    The FCC has been acting on amateur renewals and administrative
    updates filed on-line via the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's
    Universal Licensing System. As of December 3, 2001, anyone filing an
    application with the FCC must include an FCC Registration Number
    (FRN).
     
  2. V73GOD

    V73GOD Ham Member QRZ Page

    I like the part where they (FCC) were too scared to process the applications but not too worried to process the checks in the same envelope. Hooah!
     
  3. WA7KPK

    WA7KPK Ham Member QRZ Page

    The FCC never saw the checks. The envelopes were opened by Mellon Bank employees (government contractors), the checks recorded and deposited, and the contents . . . well, they went wherever they went.

    What precautions Mellon Bank took to shield their employees, or whether there are mails still floating around out there in the Great Beyond, is another good topic for speculation. There's been a great deal of discussion about this on Mike Carroll's Vanity Call Headquarters message board (http://www.carroll-usa.com/vanity), for obvious reasons.

    73, Creede
     
  4. WA4MJF

    WA4MJF Banned QRZ Page

    I thought Mellon Bank lost their US contracts a couple months ago 'cause they lost a few million of the governments dollars...

    Anyone else see that on the news???

    73 de Ronnie
     
  5. WA7KPK

    WA7KPK Ham Member QRZ Page

    I didn't, but we don't get much Mellon Bank news out here in Washington.



    How on earth do you lose a few million dollars? Did they check their couch cushions? :)



    73, Creede
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

ad: CQMM-1