Two Clubs Jointly Operating a Repeater

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio Clubs' started by K5TCJ, Dec 10, 2019.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: Left-2
ad: Left-3
ad: L-MFJ
ad: Subscribe
ad: l-BCInc
  1. K5TCJ

    K5TCJ Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    Any clubs out there operating a repeater with another club?
    How did you work out and document the details of who does what, who provides what, etc. etc.
    Is there a executed memorandum of understanding (MOU)?
    If you are in such an arrangement, you input and advice is invited.
    73,
    Tim
     
  2. KP4SX

    KP4SX Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    Sounds like a potentially unfavorable arrangement over the long term.
     
    KA9JLM likes this.
  3. K5TCJ

    K5TCJ Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    That's what I'm hoping to avoid, by seeing how other clubs have documented and agreed on this type of arrangement.
    73, Tim
     
  4. KA9JLM

    KA9JLM Ham Member QRZ Page

    Exactly.

    Because there will be a fight over head strong power.

    I have seen best of friends become enemies. :(
     
  5. KB3DFZ

    KB3DFZ Ham Member QRZ Page

    This is interesting. Our club has a repeater committee that handles our 4 repeaters, including repairs and upgrades and can spend 'a reasonable amount' of money without necessarily needing an authorizing vote. This along the lines of getting a repair done between monthly meetings, or when we upgraded the 440, the decision as to which radio and vendor was left up to the committee - generally so that if we were buying on qrz on ebay, we could jump on it without waiting till next month when the item sold.

    I feel for two clubs, either a comittee or a sort of "repeater association" type club should be created for the express purpose of running the repeater(s). This club would form its own 501c3, have its own bank account, and receive donations from participants (individuals or clubs). Two clubs is tricky, since each would want to have an equal vote, whereas a larger repeater association might have at least 5, but possibly dozens of members each with their own vote. With two, you might have equal votes, but no tie-breaker. You also have the concern of which club puts more money into the project. For two clubs, it seems like you want to make everyone in each club a member of repeater association by default and have a combined meeting (maybe an online voting deal) whenever there's a major repeater concern. So it's not "club a votes yea", and "club b votes nay", but rather that a majority of repeater members votes a certain way. With a majority vote of the users on what to do, it can still be up to individual clubs to determine how much they want to donate to the repeater association. That can be part of a voting discussion "you can vote to get a yaesu fusion repeater, but our club isn't going to fund that".

    Long-term, if there's a disagreement over the repeater (should we link it, should it be analog, d-star, fusion, or dmr, should it speak the time and weather every couple hours?) no paper or MOU is going to mitigate bad feelings. But by moving the responsibility from clubs to individuals, then that mitigates a lot of it. You don't have 2 clubs maintaining a repeater, you have individuals that are members of the repeater club and their individual club maintaining a repeater.
     

Share This Page