SB-200 Damaged plate on "TUNE" capacitor

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio Amplifiers' started by KJ4AQU, Apr 1, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: abrind-2
ad: Subscribe
ad: L-MFJ
ad: Left-2
ad: Left-3
  1. KJ4AQU

    KJ4AQU Ham Member QRZ Page

    When I received the amp that's the way the bandswitch and the TUNE Cap was. I repaired the bandswitch. The previous owner said he had nearly 700 watts output on 10 meters and I said no way not with the contacts the way they were. So he refunded me part of the payment I made.

    All the testing I have been doing has been into a dummy load. As for antenna VSMR less than 1.5:1 I have a Titan DX.
  2. W1QJ

    W1QJ Ham Member QRZ Page

    I think I have a good SB-200 tune cap here. if you don't win that one on EBAY maybe we can swap a good one for that one and a few bucks. The burned plate won't bother me. Lou
  3. WB2WIK

    WB2WIK Platinum Subscriber Platinum Subscriber QRZ Page

    The old "turned the bandswitch when I meant to turn the TUNE or LOAD cap" is a common problem with SB-200s and other amps that put the controls in line like that and use the same size knobs for everything.

    That was a really silly thing for Heath to do. Ameritron's done a far better job of placing the bandswitch at a different level than the tuning controls and giving it a different sized knob so this mistake is far less likely to happen. I've often wanted to give the Heath designers twenty lashes for silly stuff like that.
  4. W1BR

    W1BR Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    When my black front panel comes in from Martin I'll be using the Ameriton style knobs. That will
    stop with the knob confusion. Adding a vernier drive to the plate tune cap was a must do.

  5. KJ4AQU

    KJ4AQU Ham Member QRZ Page

    Hey Lou, I would rather deal with you than eBay. Let me know if you have a tune cap. I can always cancel my bid!

    Also I am contemplating just selling it as is too.
  6. WA7PRC

    WA7PRC Ham Member QRZ Page

    Interesting. In 40 years, I've never done that with my SB-220. The '220 has the controls Tune-Load-Bandswitch, while the '200 has the controls Load-Tune-Bandswitch. It certainly could happen often if the bandswitch was in the middle.
  7. W1BR

    W1BR Premium Subscriber QRZ Page


    You only have to do it once :) I admit to mistakingly grabbing the bandswitch while retuning
    my SB-220 amp -- being distracted by a DX pileup. I had owned the amp for over 30
    years. Yeah, my stupid mistake, but it does happen.

  8. WB2WIK

    WB2WIK Platinum Subscriber Platinum Subscriber QRZ Page

    I think you're more careful than most. Lots of people have turned the bandswitch accidentally while transmitting, with typically bad results.

    Heath made a design error when they mounted the bandswitch to the front panel with a nut behind the knob, also. Dumb, dumb, dumb...such critical components should always be rigidly mounted to something behind the panel and not the panel itself and either use multiple attachment points or at least Loctite on the threads. I've repaired a lot of Heath amps that were damaged simply because the nut came loose and allowed the whole switch to rotate, not just the shaft and contact on the wafers.

    I think the SB-220 was a great design electrically and not so smart mechanically. In fact, using the four screws that hold the feet on for captivating the whole slide-on outer cover was kind of Novice-level, as was using sheet metal screws that self-thread into holes in aluminum to hold the inside shields in place (PEMs were available and cost five cents each; way better idea that allows repeated re-uses without damage).

    But they sure sold a lot of them, including one to me.
  9. W1BR

    W1BR Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    duplicate this forum is extremely slow today??
  10. WB2WIK

    WB2WIK Platinum Subscriber Platinum Subscriber QRZ Page

    I agree with that, too. The SB amps tune way too fast for comfort.

    I know the goal was to make it powerful and cheap and they cut every corner they could to keep the materials cost down, but I doubt they would have lost a single sale if the price was $25 higher, which would have allowed them to use $5.95 (at the time) planetary reduction drives on both capacitors.

    There was absolutely nothing else on the market in that price range...the world was their oyster.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page