ready to give up on QRP

Discussion in 'QRP Corner' started by KI4QYI, Jul 24, 2019.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: L-MFJ
ad: Left-2
ad: Left-3
ad: Subscribe
ad: FBNews-1
  1. KI4POT

    KI4POT Ham Member QRZ Page

    I have the internal version sold/installed by W4RT. I consider it essential as well. Between that, turning off IPO, using the Attenuator, and turning down the antenna gain, I can usually reduce noise to acceptable levels.

    FWIW, the W4RT internal DSP has been known to cause noise in the radio. Mine did and I had to get a 3rd party to fix it because W4RT would not support their product.

  2. KC7JNJ

    KC7JNJ Ham Member QRZ Page

    I too have turned off the IPO. And have come to really rely on turning down the gain to get folks so I can hear them.
    WD0BCT likes this.
  3. KD8ZM

    KD8ZM Ham Member QRZ Page

    So I sat down at 2100z today and called CQ with 5 watts, for an hour. I did have 4 QSOs during that time: NY, TN, NC, and OH (from my SW Ohio location). 30/40 bands. Nothing exotic, and far fewer QSOs than in normal conditions, but still a heckuva lot of fun! Don't give up. 73
    Brady kd8zm
    W4XDX, F8WBD, KI4POT and 1 other person like this.
  4. N8AFT

    N8AFT Ham Member QRZ Page

    Hello Brady!
    I've been running antenna challenged from my YL's QTH in Canton, Ohio these past few weeks.
    I now have a 125' Zepp up around 25' and QRP is now possible from there...
    My 100w QRO sigs were so PW using an EFHW at 7' that it felt like I was indeed QRP..
    OH! Listen out at 3560 after 9pm EDT for Dale, Ko8L in Cleveland...
    His 2w HB rig gives me 599+ 10dB here in Columbus!
    KD8ZM likes this.
  5. WN1MB

    WN1MB XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Well boo-fuggin-HOO!

    I sure hope that's not going to cripple your endeavors too much...;)
  6. N8AFT

    N8AFT Ham Member QRZ Page

    I own a few amps myself, Drake L7, L4B, Palstar HF2500 and a Collins 30L1.
    There's no shame in having the extra horsepower and using it.
    You paid for it so enjoy it.
    Sounds like some folks have a much different opinion of QRO.
    That's too bad.
    Thought we were more open minded and accepting on this mostly CW forum.
  7. G0NMY

    G0NMY Ham Member QRZ Page

    Ive not read through all this thread but a 200ft run of Rg8 coax would be quite lossy, measure your power at the antenna end of the coax
    and then adjust your power to compensate for the losses.
    However, it would still be lossy on receive.
    If you really want to cut down on losses try using a balanced feeder style antenna.
    If none of this is possible then go for a higher power set up. but you will still have the rx losses.
    I think you could make great improvements by getting a lower loss antenna system.
    Just my opinion, QRP can work but antenna efficiency is a must at Solar minimum.
    Good luck 73 Mark
    W4XDX likes this.

Share This Page