ad: k1jek

New FCC 60-meter band rules

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by W6RZ, Dec 10, 2025.

ad: L-giga
ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: L-Geochron
ad: abrind-2
ad: ldg-1
ad: chuckmartin-2
ad: Left-2
ad: Left-3
  1. AI9K

    AI9K Ham Member QRZ Page

    I see your logic...thanks
     
  2. W0QL

    W0QL XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Now we know a date, February 13, 2026 (which is February 12 at 5pm MST where I am located.) I've decided I'll stick with the current frequency and drop my power to 9.15 Watts ERP, which for my 43 foot vertical means 15 watts from the transmitter. I've been practicing that power for the past few days and it is more of a challenge. I will also monitor Channel 2 to see if there is 100 watt ft8 activity.
     
  3. KR3DX

    KR3DX XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    How did you calculate that 15 watts into your antenna would equal 9.15 watts ERP? Your 43 foot vertical is just about a quarter wavelength long on the 60M band, it has gain over an isotropic source! Unless you have 2dB of loss in your feed system, you will be over the 9.15W ERP limit.

    See my post #237
     
  4. KF0BBU

    KF0BBU Ham Member QRZ Page

    ERP is in the real world. EIRP is the isotropic figure you are talking about. The zero line is a 1/2W dipole with ground reflective gain, which is 8. something dB. Best 1/4 wave you are going to get is about 2-3 dB below that. I think he is calculating it that way. I kind of figured 20 watts into a really good vertical is just fine.
     
  5. KR3DX

    KR3DX XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Are you serious? Is that like "toilet paper math"? You know, 12=18, 24=36, etc. :):D:rolleyes:
     
  6. KF0BBU

    KF0BBU Ham Member QRZ Page

    I don't even know wtf you are talking about, but do what you feel is best! LOL
     
  7. KF0BBU

    KF0BBU Ham Member QRZ Page

    Here is a quote to help your confusion. "As of February 13, FCC-licensed amateur operators holding General Class or higher licenses may operate on a secondary basis anywhere between 5351.5 and 5366.5 kHz, subject to a maximum bandwidth of 2.8 kHz and maximum transmit power of 9.15 watts ERP (effective radiated power). For the purpose of computing ERP, the transmitter PEP (peak envelope power) is multiplied by the antenna gain relative to a half-wave dipole antenna. A half-wave dipole is presumed to have a gain of 1 (0 dBd). Amateurs using other antennas must maintain in their station records either the antenna manufacturer's data on the antenna gain or calculations of the antenna gain." It is not EIRP it is ERP. If you have modeled any antennas, then you would know that a half wave dipole has a gain of about 8 dB. That varies a little depending on height above ground, so I apologize not exact numbers. A quarter wave vertical has a gain figure of around 5-6 dB. Therefore 2-3 dB below a dipole. 3 dB is half power. Is this starting to click a little bit?
     
  8. KR3DX

    KR3DX XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Do you know what you are talking about? You are obviously the one who is confused. For the purposes of this rule, the ground reflection is not considered in the gain of a horizontal antenna. 20W into "a really good vertical"? I guess "a really good vertical" has less gain than an isotropic source, LOL. I'm not going to discuss this with you any further, you need more help than I can give you.

    73
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2026
  9. KF0BBU

    KF0BBU Ham Member QRZ Page

    Ok I will. It isn't in comparison to an isotropic radiator. It is in comparison to a halfwave dipole above ground.
     
  10. KF0BBU

    KF0BBU Ham Member QRZ Page

    BTW I just looked at your QRZ page. You say that W8JI is a good source for information. I suggest you go there and he has a writeup of exactly what I am saying! lol
     
  11. KB3CXQ

    KB3CXQ Ham Member QRZ Page

    Those comments scream loudly of a no-code FT8 only operator.
     
  12. K1IO

    K1IO XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Those were two different comments, taking rather different views. As a general rule, the Commission is supposed to acknowledge the diverse viewpoints expressed in Comments when it writes its Order. It can decide to ignore or disagree with any of them, of course. It is clear, though, that FT8 and other digital modes are legal on that band.
     
    KB3CXQ likes this.
  13. W2JTM

    W2JTM Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    There's no mention of ground gain. The rule is 15 W dbi period.
    So if you're using a half wave dipole (theoretically has gain of 2.15db) then your maximum power is 9.15 W (i.e. 10 log (9.15 /15) = -2.15).
    See footnote 119 in the report.
    Jim, W2JTM
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2026
    KR3DX likes this.
  14. W2JTM

    W2JTM Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    Correction :
    There's no mention of ground gain. The rule is 15 W EIRP period.
    So if you're using a half wave dipole (theoretically has gain of 2.15db) then your maximum power is 9.15 W (i.e. 10 log (9.15 /15) = -2.15).
    See paragraph 34 in the report.
    Jim, W2JTM
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2026
    KR3DX likes this.
  15. W7UUU

    W7UUU Director, QRZ Forums Lifetime Member 133 QRZ HQ Staff Life Member QRZ Page

    Maybe I don't get your point but in defense of W5ESE, he's FAR from a "no code FT8 only operator". He's a long-time very proficient CW op.

    Dave
    W7UUU
     
    KB3CXQ, WW3QB, N1EN and 3 others like this.

Share This Page

ad: HamXOrg-1