That doesn’t have anything to do with it does it? As I have repeatedly cited in my writings, the claim was that WINLINK was unique. That it alone could not be read. There was no claim that depended on the amount of usage. I am simply testing that claim for due diligence in finding that it was inadequate. One person alleged that terrorists could use such a system. Obviously, that does not have any dependence on the amount of usage by others! So please now support your claims.