ad: UR5CDX-1

How does the ARRL CEO Ham?

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by KM9G, Sep 28, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: Left-2
ad: L-Geochron
ad: HRDLLC-2
ad: L-MFJ
ad: MessiPaoloni-1
ad: abrind-2
ad: Left-3
  1. WN1MB

    WN1MB Ham Member QRZ Page

    Context, my friend. Context.

    From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]:

    ham
    n 1: meat cut from the thigh of a hog (usually smoked) [syn:
    {ham}, {jambon}, {gammon}]
    2: (Old Testament) son of Noah
    3: a licensed amateur radio operator
    4: an unskilled actor who overacts [syn: {ham}, {ham actor}]
    v 1: exaggerate one's acting [syn: {overact}, {ham it up},
    {ham}, {overplay}] [ant: {underact}, {underplay}]

    So taking the WordNet definition of the verb, the tag line could suggest his exaggerated acting in the role of CEO. History shows that has been a common trait of a couple recent CEOs - IMO, at least.
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2021
    W0FS, K0UO, K5VZD and 3 others like this.
  2. N0DZQ

    N0DZQ Ham Member QRZ Page

    and THIS apparently was the price…
     
    NK2U, KF0DHQ, M1WML and 1 other person like this.
  3. N1IPU

    N1IPU Ham Member QRZ Page

    [​IMG]
     
    N8ZI, NK2U, ZS1SBW and 2 others like this.
  4. N1IPU

    N1IPU Ham Member QRZ Page

    Of course the post above will be deemed political by one in the same soon.
     
    ZS1SBW, KF0DHQ and M1WML like this.
  5. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    MO--

    We live in a world where people want to not only control, but distort or incorrectly portray, facts.

    Dave is a good person and deserves better treatment than taking his comments either out of context, or paraphrased in such a way that it misrepresents his point of view. So why should he cooperate given that situation?

    He is owed an apology.

    73
    Chip W1YW
     
    K3SX, NN4RH, M1WML and 1 other person like this.
  6. K0DUC

    K0DUC Ham Member QRZ Page

    The entire drama with Mr. Heath is an interesting one. Mr. Heath appears to be a great radio operator, a long time active and successful amateur radio participant, and a wealth of knowledge on the subject. I think his remarks on the ARRL have some truth to them, and some of his ideas are worth expounding upon.

    However, Mr. Heath is also quite egotistical, a claim that is validated by many videos he has made and the way he goes about many things. He makes sure to put his name on everything, with his latest video the end of the title is Listen To Jim W9LG's Words as he commands us to head his incredibly wise teachings. His useful criticisms of the ARRL are somewhat buried under the fact the entire direction of the drama that resulted was that he was more or less being childishly angry that he wasn't being treated as well PERSONALLY by the ARRL and its CEO as nicely as he thought he should be.

    Mr. Heath is right, it should be called a radio service, not just referenced to as a mere hobby. Even if the hobby part is the majority, it is the ARRL's job to promote and defend the radio service, which includes promoting its best positive attributes such as public service, and there is public service in Ham. That is a valid point.

    I also started to get the vibe and feeling from some board members and the ARRL in general of "Common guys, its a dying hobby, just accept the loss of bandwith and accept the doom of a dying hobby filled with old dying white men". If a man would not pay a lawyer to slander him in a court and plead for a guilty verdict in court, why would he pay $50 a year to the ARRL to have his advocacy group tell him his hobby is essentially dying and he should look forward to telecoms running him over?

    Certainly, Ham is going to lose a lot of high bandwith, as it has more and more practical uses outside Amateur radio. That's a fact, and the ARRL, or almost no one, can stop that. When we should be hearing this, when the ARRL said "we put up the good fight and we'll fight every other grab, even if the prevailing wind is against us", I get the feeling radio operators are being told to build a casket and mourn the death of their crappy little kids fun hobby.

    Instead of saying "we can't defend high bandwith that a dozen amateur radio operators use against a business that wants to serve hundreds of thousands of customers", some of the explanations almost made the ARRL sound like they worked for the telecoms. Explaining the loss sounded more like they were against the radio services, instead of for them.

    When a group like the ARRL or NRA start demanding a leadership role over the people it is supposed to serve, instead of following what the members fight for, there is reason for concern. Remember, it is YOUR job as a member to kick them in the back and keep them moving, not your job to prove your loyalty by going along with anything they come up with.

    Keep prodding them and guiding them with a stick. Organizations, the bigger they are, are like dumb animals, because collectives of people are stupid. You have to keep hitting them and guiding them. It isn't showing lack of loyalty to the cause, it is being the MOST purposeful and true to the purpose.
     
    AK5B and M1WML like this.
  7. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    Many of you know my opinion on the 'amateur radio SERVICE' vs the 'hobby radio' issue. I will not revisit that.

    My point is that the ARRL CEO is not the only voice of the ARRL. You have a President; you have a BOARD of 15 directors--all of which feel free to tell the CEO what he should be doing, on call, all the time. Fifteen cooks. Imagine...Then you have a very dedicated, friendly, and professional staff. Don't forget them.

    The ARRL is very much aware that Part 97 is a SERVICE and is represented as such, particularly in DC, as the board directs that. It is more than reasonable to remind fellow amateurs of our multi-part Part 97 mission, but it would be naive to think that Dave is not well aware that we are a SERVICE. I mean, really: cut him some slack.

    When speaking to a hobby-oriented audience, it is not unreasonable to discuss Part 97 's 'hobby' aspect.

    As to lack of 'polish' in an ARRL presentation...well, these are not easy times and finding the right people to do stuff is not easy. Again, cut Dave slack.

    The ARRL has taken a very nice position in the last couple of years of projecting , as it should, the fun of ham radio, and its I-N-C-L-U-S-I-V-E nature. That' sounds fine business to me.

    73
    Chip W1YW
     
    M1WML, W0FS, W9EBE and 1 other person like this.
  8. W9FFF

    W9FFF Ham Member QRZ Page

    After joining the ARRL, I no longer think they are right for me based on some personal experiences with them, recently. He also didn't seem to care too much about the ft8off, even though it's exactly what he envisions in contests. Maybe it was his body language or maybe he doesn't really care. Regardless, good interview as always
     
    M1WML, KM9G and KF0DHQ like this.
  9. KF0DHQ

    KF0DHQ Ham Member QRZ Page

    5:00 " Cross road of the hobby"
    Fist of all, debunking a statement by the format, (A normal chat or video), is very illogical. It doesn't need to be in words it is very normal to rebut an argument with the same format. A. to appeal to the majority ( Every one watched that video why not this?) and B. you don't have to write out something that's already said!

    A duel solved issues in the 17th and 18th centuries we just changed formats.


    Jack A. Weigel KF0DHQ "73's"
     
    M1WML likes this.
  10. W1YW

    W1YW Ham Member QRZ Page

    "have my machine call your machine..."
     
    K3OXL, M1WML and W0FS like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page