FCC releases proposal for new filing fee structure

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by K2IGO, Aug 28, 2020.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: Left-2
ad: Left-3
ad: Subscribe
ad: L-MFJ
ad: abrind-2
  1. W7IMM

    W7IMM Ham Member QRZ Page

    A $100/QSO digital "Tax" for conveying little or no information other than callsign, signal report and grid square!!
  2. KB9BVN

    KB9BVN Ham Member QRZ Page

    FT8 is a beacon mode....FCC should charge per CQ.
  3. AC0GT

    AC0GT Ham Member QRZ Page

    I'll repeat my earlier suggestion that this thread be closed for being redundant, there's other threads on the FCC fee proposal. All I'm seeing here is a tendency to go off topic. My bad for feeding the trolls earlier.
    N6ATF likes this.
  4. W7IMM

    W7IMM Ham Member QRZ Page

    I agree with you 100%
  5. N3RSJ

    N3RSJ Ham Member QRZ Page

    If any reason to implement a increase of processing fee to our hobby radio service be it within reason.
    So any such fee exceeding $10 would be unreasonable.
    Just who configured this fee amount in a time of machines and computers that process licenses.
    Such Ideas pick away at the very foundation of this radio service open to any citizen of the United States.
  6. ND6M

    ND6M Ham Member QRZ Page

    ... and some would say $10 is unreasonable.
    N6ATF likes this.
  7. W7IMM

    W7IMM Ham Member QRZ Page

    Indeed. There's many that think other people should pay for their "stuff".......It's not a new concept......It works until we run out of other peoples money.......(someone famous said that but the name escapes me.....)
    ND6M likes this.
  8. AC0GT

    AC0GT Ham Member QRZ Page

    Margaret Thatcher
  9. N6ATF

    N6ATF Ham Member QRZ Page

    There's many that think nobody should have to pay even 1 punitive cent for providing, nor being a public beneficiary of, a voluntary noncommercial communication service.
  10. WZ7U

    WZ7U Ham Member QRZ Page

    never mind, not worth the blowback

Share This Page