No need for you, Ken, to aplogize. If any, the apologies should be flowing the other direction. Unless Reaston knows you, he can't possibly have the knowledge to justify some of his comments. I infer that he is assuming a lot--we all know what "assume" means when dissected. I know virtually nothing about Reaston, not even whether Reaston is a surname, which in polite company would call for the "mister" preceding it. And, based on his "behaviour" here, I am happier NOT knowing him. Reaston: If you are feeling tough and all-mighty, take a few jabs at me, just for fun.