ARRL speaks on Regulation by Bandwidth

NL7W · Apr 22, 2006

[b said:

Quote[/b] (kh6ty @ April 17 2006,16:01)]Just received QST for May. On page 13, the ARRL states, "ARRL continues to believe that its petition is a measured response to progress in digital telecommunications technology and successfully balances the interests of all, regardless of which of the polarized opinions in in this proceeding, if any , constitutes a 'majority' view."

I guess "balances the interests of all" means that the ARRL/Winlink consortium intends to have it all!

They are hopeless!

The ARRL leadership just HAS to go.
Click to expand...

You are so right! The League's carefully worded doublespeak cannot whitewash the overwhelming majority of American hams against (85% against) this ad hoc committee's travesty of fair representation and program management. They've received my last dollar.

73.

AD4MG · Apr 29, 2006

[b said:

Quote[/b] ] ad4mg: Now Mike, I challenge you to rise above your juvenile name calling and discuss the issue at hand. This thread is about expressing the outrage at the reaction the ARRL exhibits to the majority of commenters being against the proposal as it is written, not anything about how well pactor works, or how much you like it. Or do you wish to continue calling me a "sad little man"? I have the ability to ignore your name calling and express my opinion in a manner that is found to acceptable to most. What have you got? The invitation is extended, the floor is yours.
Click to expand...

[b said:

Quote[/b] ]ab0wr: That's what happens when you try to defend the indefensible.
Click to expand...

Valid point Tim. Looks like this guy can only spew the rhetoric, and lacks the coherent ability to debate. Didn't take long to expose him!

Ciao

KY5U · Jun 9, 2006

Remember, when you hear anything about Regulation by Bandwidth.... Just Say No!

ARRL speaks on Regulation by Bandwidth

NL7W Ham Member QRZ Page

AD4MG Banned QRZ Page

KY5U Ham Member QRZ Page

Share This Page