ad: MLSons-1

Chameleon Antenna: MPAS 2.0 Review

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by K5ATA, Jan 12, 2021.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: Left-2
ad: abrind-2
ad: L-MFJ
ad: Radclub22-2
ad: Left-3
  1. K5ATA

    K5ATA Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    One part of a multi-part review of the Chameleon Antenna. This one in the vertical configuration.

     
    KN4JND, KP4JM, WA6QGH and 5 others like this.
  2. 2E0HVK

    2E0HVK XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    A pole, some wire and a 5:1 transformer. For how much? :eek:

    Nice video but honestly . . . . why?
     
    AE5X, KB0TTL, NN4RH and 7 others like this.
  3. N6KZB

    N6KZB Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    He does have a great radio, ICOM-7300!
     
    WA2LXB and K0UO like this.
  4. WN1MB

    WN1MB Ham Member QRZ Page

    I stopped viewing when I heard this:

    "This is ... oh, I forget the fancy name for it ... it's the little matching unit ..."
     
    PY2NEA, W5CJA, NN4RH and 5 others like this.
  5. K0UO

    K0UO Platinum Subscriber Platinum Subscriber QRZ Page

    The best part was that he is not missing with a QRP rig,
    I like his 7300 and he was in QSO with one of my fellow Belize hams too
     
    HB9EAJ likes this.
  6. KE0GXN

    KE0GXN XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    408EF947-DBDF-4B4D-B3C4-4F8C90C172DB.gif
     
    PY2NEA, UR3QTN, AK5B and 1 other person like this.
  7. VE3IPS

    VE3IPS XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    click bait I have one from the early days
     
    KL7KN and AK5B like this.
  8. KJ6TTR

    KJ6TTR XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    I don’t think you understand what “click bait” means. “Chameleon Antenna MPAS 2.0 Review” is not “click bait.”
     
    KC5HWB, KD2TUD and N1XES like this.
  9. KB0TTL

    KB0TTL XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    An interesting concept, however, I could probably do just as well with a spool of wire, an assortment of baluns (1:1, 4:1, 9:1, 49:1), a fiberglass crape poll, some rope, and some PVC insulators. I love to DIY for QRP. What can I say?
     
    PY2NEA and WN1MB like this.
  10. M5FRA

    M5FRA Ham Member QRZ Page

    Why pay so much for a simple antenna? Like other day you can make something similar for very little money.
     
  11. W5CJA

    W5CJA XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    IMHO only...these antennas are designed to hook the inexperienced operators, former military, and prepper types. No offense meant, because I've been hooked in by older Alpha Antenna products, I'm former military, and also a light prepper so please don't think I'm looking down my nose at those groups.
     
  12. KI7AY

    KI7AY Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    A regular Ham giving a presentation. So what if he forgot to call it a matching unit. I understand that purists would look down on someone making a mistake, but really, guys, he did pretty well.
     
    K4SFC, KC5HWB and KJ6TTR like this.
  13. W5CJA

    W5CJA XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    It's not fair to every YouTuber that criticism comes their way...even though it is an art form and all art is subject to criticism. It's just that this site is inundated with low information / high production quality "reviews" that are only designed to sell products and not really INFORM new and existing hams. I'm not sure where the OP falls into this because I haven't watched the video. Unfortunately, the influencers have given the average youtuber ham a bad name because we can't really trust what they say.
     
  14. KJ6TTR

    KJ6TTR XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Maybe if you are retired, unemployed, have lots of time on your hands, or just want to, then building your own antenna is a better idea than buying an antenna. But, for those of us who do a cost/benefit analysis and conclude that we’d rather pay $150 rather than spending 1 to 2 or 10 hours building our own, then that’s what we should do. I have always said, “Do what only you can do, and pay others to do everything else.”
     
    N1OG and KF5ZPA like this.
  15. 2E0HVK

    2E0HVK XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Plenty of companies make wire antennas. Buy a Fiberglass mast or two, put up the antenna. Save 100's compared to an MPAS 2.0 and no extra time investment. I'm sorry, but in any cost/benefit analysis I can think of, and in every configuration, the MPAS 2.0 never wins.

    But hey, the MPAS 2.0 looks good!

    Maybe one day someone will do a direct A/B comparison with an EFHW and fiberglass pole. That's the only review worth watching IMO. I'm not holding my breath though.
     
    KC5HWB and M5FRA like this.

Share This Page

ad: MLSons-1