QRZ Forums   QRZ Ad 416
 
 Forum Home   QRZ Home 


QRZ Ad 55

QRZ Ad 2144

QRZ Ad 2136

QRZ Ad 1992

QRZ Ad 1440
QRZ Ad 2137

Google Search
 
QRZ Web




 

Donate to QRZ
Contributions Accepted


Go Back   QRZ Forums > Ham Radio Tech > Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2009, 05:09 AM
AJ4QE's Avatar
AJ4QE AJ4QE is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 27
Default Is D-Star sole-sourced by ICOM?

I've read that D-Star is an open standard, but I've only seen D-Star equipment ads by ICOM. Are other manufacturers currently making D-Star equipment? If not, do we know if patent licensing problems could be part of the reason?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2009, 05:29 AM
KB4QAA KB4QAA is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Mary's County, Maryland
Posts: 710
Default

No and Yes.

Icom is the only manufacturer currently producing D-Star radios for the US market.

The Codec is owned by the Japanese amateur association, and the standard is published (in Japanese) as i understand it.

I believe that an ic chip is available with the codec as well, if you feel like designing your own circuits.

Sooo,
No need to get in an uproar. Everything is on the up and up.

73, Bill
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2009, 05:44 AM
WU8Y WU8Y is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: EN82
Posts: 356
Default

Unfortunately, ICOM is the only company manufacturing D-STAR radios for sale in North America. I'd rather there be more competition. The DV Dongle is an alternative, in some situations, but it's not as flexible as a RF link.

The D-STAR specification is published here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2009, 05:46 AM
KB4QAA KB4QAA is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Mary's County, Maryland
Posts: 710
Default

Domo arigato!

*bows*
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:06 AM
KA7O's Avatar
KA7O KA7O is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Wyoming
Posts: 843
Default

Been awhile since I looked at all this - but near as I remember....

The D-star spec is published. It specifies the AMBE 2020 codec.

The codec is not freely available. It must be licensed from DVSI as a 'black box' (either chips or pre-compiled binaries). No one but DVSI knows exactly how it works. Since the codec isn't freely published it's a tad tricky to conjure up a compatible 3rd party codec that would work with D-star. It also may be of questionable legality under the DMCA, at least in the US.

That's the crux of the 'open' vs 'proprietary' debate around D-star. If a freely available and published codc could be used, then D-star would be truely free and open.

http://www.arrl-al.org/Dstar_al_advanced.pdf

http://www.dvsinc.com/products/a2020.htm
__________________
Web Monkey for the Casper Amateur Radio Club, DN62

Registered Linux user #227845
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:22 AM
AI6DX's Avatar
AI6DX AI6DX is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DM13
Posts: 1,104
Default

I think that D-STAR will fall to the demise just like 1.2G did about 15 years ago. Back then, the 1.2G advertising was "all-the-rage." Now look at it. One can't find affordable and NEW MOBILE 1.2G radios on the market. I don't care about the hand helds. The ICOM ID-1 (mobile) is the only amateur radio that makes a NEW mobile which offers both D-STAR and analog FM........ All for around $1,100 msrp.

Not worth it in the long run........
__________________
It's called, "WILL." Got any?

Last edited by AI6DX; 05-18-2009 at 07:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:42 AM
KC8VWM's Avatar
KC8VWM KC8VWM is online now
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EM16xd
Posts: 2,120
Default

"Licensing" is the answer you are looking for...
__________________
73 de Charles - KC8VWM

North American QRP CW Club #3159, SKCC# 5752
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:44 AM
WA9SVD WA9SVD is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,901
Default

The original specification IS in the public domain, developed by JARL. Apparently only one company has seen fit (or gone through the trouble) to develop a hardware CODEC to fit the standard. Use of THEIR codec may well require licensing, which is what Icom has done.
Other manufacturers could develop their own codec (at considerable R&D expense) or license the current source for a fee (Kenwood has reportedly done the latter with some equipment sold in the Japanese/Asian Market.)
If another company wished to develop their own codec, and (most easily and efficiently) put it on a chip, no one can (legally) stop them. But no other company or manufacturer has seen fit (or seen the profit) in "reinventing the wheel."
Apparently, Yaesu and Kenwood are waiting to see if Icom can create enough interest amoungst the Amateur community to make D-Star a viable concept in the Amateur market world-wide, or if it will merely become a "niche" specialty aspect of Amateur radio, and not justify the expense of developing their own implementation of D-Star, or merely license the current technology and pay the royality fees for such. With the current price differential between traditional analogue equipment and the D-Star equipment, it's doubtful it will become THE mainstream mode used on VHF and higher in the foreseeable future.

Last edited by WA9SVD; 05-18-2009 at 10:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:39 PM
W9GB's Avatar
W9GB W9GB is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,519
Post

Quote:
The CODEC is not freely available.
It must be licensed from DVSI as a 'black box' (either chips or pre-compiled binaries). No one but DVSI knows exactly how it works. Since the codec isn't freely published it's a tad tricky to conjure up a compatible 3rd party codec that would work with D-star.
It also may be of questionable legality under the DMCA, at least in the US.
That's the crux of the 'open' vs 'proprietary' debate around D-star.
Tate -

Absolutely. Your last sentence is the best summary and
D-STAR's future sucess or failure in the USA -- will be decided by this DVSI CODEC issue.

w9gb
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:56 PM
N5RFX's Avatar
N5RFX N5RFX is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,951
Default

Other manufacturers could produce DStar radios, but have not. This was a marketing decision on their part. The DStar protocol is open, but there have been some ICOM advancements that will need to be licesned.

As far as the DVSI AMBE 2020 codec is concerned, it is the best and only codec out there that can meet the requirments for digital voice. Name a open source codec that can be used with a GMSK modem and occupy 6.25 kHz. You won't find one. APCO 25 uses the DVSI IMBE chip that occupied 12.5 kHz and will be moving to AMBE.

There are boards that are available now that will allow you to convert a non-dstar radio to dstar with a bit of surgury. An avancment to the DV Dongle was shown at Dayton which is supposed to lead to a product that will allow non dstar radios to use dstar. It is yet to be seen what type of surgury will be needed on the radio.

With the emphasis on Dstar at Dayton and the interest I saw at the DStar users group booth, the momentum is there for the other manufacturers to take notice.

73,
Mark N5RFX
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Copyright © 1995-2008 QRZ.COM