QRZ Forums  
 
 Forum Home   QRZ Home 


QRZ Ad 2038

QRZ Ad 1995
QRZ Ad 1440
QRZ Ad 55

QRZ Ad 1496

Google Search
 
QRZ Web




 

Do you find QRZ helpful?
We appreciate your support.

Go Back   QRZ Forums > Ham Radio Tech > Antenna Design & Construction
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:50 AM
KE5UFH KE5UFH is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana, PA
Posts: 7
Default Building my own antenna

I am a relatively new Ham, having got my ticket in 2008. I jumped head first into the hobby, but lost some steam after having to move to PA. I have now redeveloped my interest and am currently studying for the General license exam. I just purchased my first HF rig (FT-857D) along with the LG YT-100 auto tuner. I enjoy listening very much and currently have a 10 meter dipole up at about 20', and I receive quite a bit (at least I think so) on the 80 and 40 meter bands. I intend to build my own antennas, and have also purchased an antenna analyzer to ease the process. Dipoles are my focus, as it is what my current QTH is best suited for. I know I have enough room between my chimney and a large tree in my back yard, to stretch a 40m dipole out (appx. 69') at about 35' AGL. I have already set up a system of pulleys to raise and lower the antenna as I need to. I am reading a lot about different dipole antennas, but think I have read so much that I have confused myself. If someone can explain or direct me to good info on the easiest way to get on 80m with the room that I have. The normal dipole is what best suits my needs as I do not have the ability to hang an inverted V. Thanks in advance!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:17 PM
WA7OET WA7OET is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SeaTac, WA
Posts: 413
Default

The first thing I would suggest is to get an antenna handbook, either from the ARRL or Orr, W6SAI. Reading bits and pieces off the internet will confuse you... you need a solid foundation of antenna theory in order to logically make decisions on antennas.

Second, take any balun you have in your shack and throw it out the window.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2009, 05:04 PM
AE5JU AE5JU is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisiana Gulf Coast
Posts: 297
Default

Here's a site with plenty of antenna designs to consider:

http://www.hamuniverse.com/antennas.html

And if you have room (which you do) for a 40 meter dipole, in the same space you can put up a "New Carolina Windom":

http://www.hamuniverse.com/k4iwlnewwindom.html

which will get you on more bands with the total length of wire.

Last edited by AE5JU; 11-10-2009 at 05:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2009, 06:38 PM
G3TXQ G3TXQ is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WA7OET View Post
The first thing I would suggest is to get an antenna handbook, either from the ARRL or Orr, W6SAI. Reading bits and pieces off the internet will confuse you... you need a solid foundation of antenna theory in order to logically make decisions on antennas.

Second, take any balun you have in your shack and throw it out the window.

Good luck.
If you follow WA7OET's good advice to get the ARRL Antenna Handbook, I suggest you read carefully the section on "Unbalanced coax feeding a balanced dipole" before you follow his second piece of advice to throw baluns out of the window!

73,
Steve G3TXQ
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2009, 09:03 PM
AI3V AI3V is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Etna PA
Posts: 1,786
Default

If all you have room for is a 40m dipole (66 ft of wire), then there are 3 basic ways to get on 80m

1-Use the 40m dipole with a tuner.
2-Add "loading"coils to the 40m dipole.
3-Make a "folded dipole".Forgetabout it, this won't work.

Pros and cons......

1- if the tuner is at the transmitter end of the feedline, you will have a very high VSWR on the transmission line, and loose power.Antenna can be used on frequency's other than it's designed for with little change in efficency (I.E.will have some line loss due to VSWR).

2-The loading coil will improve the VSWR, and minimize feedline losses.Antenna will be somewhat narrow bandwidth on 80m.Antenna can be used on other bands(somewhat dependent on location of loading coils).However, operating on other bands may have high VSWR/feedline loss.

3-Good match, therefore low VSWR and feedline losses.However, the folded dipole will not work on frequency's other that it is designed for. A 80m folded dipole is pretty much only good on 80m.And will of course be too long to fit the space availible.:0

Rege
__________________
Now my mistakes travel at the speed of light!

Last edited by AI3V; 11-10-2009 at 11:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2009, 09:35 PM
G3TXQ G3TXQ is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AI3V View Post
If all you have room for is a 40m dipole (66 ft of wire), then there are 3 basic ways to get on 80m

1-Use the 40m dipole with a tuner.
2-Add "loading"coils to the 40m dipole.
3-Make a "folded dipole".

Pros and cons......

1- if the tuner is at the transmitter end of the feedline, you will have a very high VSWR on the transmission line, and loose power.Antenna can be used on frequency's other than it's designed for with little change in efficency (I.E.will have some line loss due to VSWR).

2-The loading coil will improve the VSWR, and minimize feedline losses.Antenna will be somewhat narrow bandwidth on 80m.Antenna can be used on other bands(somewhat dependent on location of loading coils).However, operating on other bands may have high VSWR/feedline loss.

3-Good match, therefore low VSWR and feedline losses.However, the folded dipole will not work on frequency's other that it is designed for. A 80m folded dipole is pretty much only good on 80m.

Rege
Rege,

I understand 1) and 2), but how do you get an 80m folded dipole into 66ft? Perhaps your meaning of "folded dipole" is different from textbook definition?

Steve G3TXQ
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2009, 10:57 PM
AI3V AI3V is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Etna PA
Posts: 1,786
Default

Just fold it a couple times, of course!

Shouldn't post in a hurry, you of course need more than 66 ft for a folded 80m dipole.

For the record, a folded dipole is the same length as a regular 1/2 wave dipole, you just get a higher impedance.

Rege
__________________
Now my mistakes travel at the speed of light!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2009, 02:06 AM
KJ4IIF KJ4IIF is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Default

Dipoles are your main interest, and they work for what they are. Great for local rag chews and nets.

An all band doublet fed with ladderline and a 4:1 balun will work for the lowest band your antenna length will allow and up through six meters. You did mention you had a tuner.

If DX is also in your interest I suggest a vertical, the low angle of radiation is fantastic for working the dx.

Many verticals available on the market and a 40 meter 1/4 wave( 75 meter for that matter) with a good ground system is definately home brewable and lots of fun.

With an all band doublet and a vertical you can have the best of both, I use the vertical for transmitting for the lower angle of radiation and the wire for recieve as it is less noise.

Which ever way you decide to go you will enjoy the HF bands.

Last edited by KJ4IIF; 11-11-2009 at 02:13 AM. Reason: add all band doublet
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2009, 02:19 AM
WA7OET WA7OET is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SeaTac, WA
Posts: 413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G3TXQ View Post
If you follow WA7OET's good advice to get the ARRL Antenna Handbook, I suggest you read carefully the section on "Unbalanced coax feeding a balanced dipole" before you follow his second piece of advice to throw baluns out of the window!

73,
Steve G3TXQ
You know I was making a joke, right mate?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-11-2009, 04:24 AM
W4PG's Avatar
W4PG W4PG is offline
QRZ Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KE5UFH View Post
If someone can explain or direct me to good info on the easiest way to get on 80m with the room that I have. The normal dipole is what best suits my needs as I do not have the ability to hang an inverted V. Thanks in advance!!
A dipole is one of the simplest antennas you can make. The length is 468/(freq in Mhz). So, for an 80 meter dipole for 3.8Mhz, the length would be 468/3.8 or about 123.16 feet. You want to actually cut it a bit longer (several inches) so you can tune it up to the frequency you want.

Feed it with 50 ohm coax. You can actually feed the coax directly to the wire and it will work fine . . . center conductor to one side and braid to the other. However, it's better to use a balun made for dipoles at the feed point, like a W2AU balun. It helps keep RF from getting back into your shack among other things.

The 2:1 SWR limits on 80 will be very narrow, however. While you can use a tuner, the losses in the coax with a high SWR makes it not worthwhile. If you want to use the antenna on other bands with a tuner, you'll need a different feedline, like open wire ladder line or twin-lead. This opens a whole 'nother can of worms.

Same goes for 40, though you'll find you can work much more of the band between the 2:1 SWR limits.

Have fun!

............Bob
__________________
ex-W4DFW Ham since 1970. ARRL Life Member and Volunteer Counsel

My QSO Map

Online logbook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Copyright © 1995-2008 QRZ.COM