QRZ Forums   QRZ Ad 402
 
 Forum Home   QRZ Home 


QRZ Ad 1496
QRZ Ad 2038

QRZ Ad 1995
QRZ Ad 1440
QRZ Ad 55


Google Search
 
QRZ Web




 

Do you find QRZ helpful?
We appreciate your support.

Go Back   QRZ Forums > Ham Radio Tech > Those Darn Computers ...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-01-2009, 06:49 AM
KC4RAN KC4RAN is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KF7AYS View Post
Using a 32bit OS on a 64 bit machine is like driving a 1968 Camaro with four plugs removed. Unsatisfying at best.
When your apps don't take advantage of 64-bit, then the underlying OS makes very little difference. If you have 4GB of RAM and don't run (insert tiny list of desktop applications here) then 32-bit is better, not having to deal with the underlying headaches of 64-bit drivers, apps that don't like 64-bit (Cisco VPN client), etc.
__________________
And now for something completely different...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-01-2009, 03:57 PM
AC0H's Avatar
AC0H AC0H is online now
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 4,555
Default

I just built a new machine 4 months ago.
Every single piece of hardware on the system, none of them exotic or bleeding edge by any stretch of the imagination, has a Win 7 64 bit driver available.

Even my HP Officejet 8000 Pro printer has a basic driver built into Win7 64 bit.
__________________
"The next time some academics tell you how important diversity is, ask how many conservatives there are in their sociology department". Thomas Sowell

CW, those that can, do.....those that can't whine about it incessantly like little girls

CW is a manually controlled, message asynchronous, simplex chat mode used without FEC.

ACØH
SPAR
ARRL
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441
FISTS #11993
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-02-2009, 06:26 PM
KD0DKI's Avatar
KD0DKI KD0DKI is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Excelsior MN.
Posts: 926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KD8JFO View Post
64 bit? never heard of it before, im still using 16 bit!!
And if you did have a machine with a 64bit OS it would not run 16bit software at all.
This feature is by design not a bug.
__________________
KD0DKI Sam

UNIX/Linux/BSD these are a few of my favorite things.

and Beer.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-02-2009, 09:23 PM
KJ6CEA KJ6CEA is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehachapi,CA
Posts: 62
Default

64-bit is backwords compatable with 32-bit processes, the dont play nicely though
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-03-2009, 05:40 AM
VA3CSS VA3CSS is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KF7AYS View Post
Using a 32bit OS on a 64 bit machine is like driving a 1968 Camaro with four plugs removed. Unsatisfying at best.
Precisely. If you're buying a new computer and plan to go with XP, then you're simply limiting yourself. Same goes with any 32-bit version of Vista or Seven.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ6CEA View Post
64-bit is backwords compatable with 32-bit processes, the dont play nicely though
64-bit Windows run what is called "WOW" (Windows on Windows). It's how the 64-bit kernel runs 32-bit apps. 99.99999% of all 32-bit apps run on 64-bit Windows.

If you have a Windows app that won't run on 64-bit Vista or Seven, then you have a 16-bit app. Time to upgrade.




And bear in mind, everyone, sticking to 32-bit is limiting in other ways. 2-Terrabyte drives are already shipping. If you expect to be able to use one with XP, you'll be running into the same wall Windows 98 did with 32Mb drives. XP can't address a 2Tb drive as one drive. Neither will any other 32-bit Windows OS - or for that matter, 32-bit Linux.

Same goes for RAM. 32-bit sees about 3.5Gb RAM maximum. We hams often run multiple windows at the same time. A browser; logger; SSTV and email all at once, for example. (Especially when you have dual screens like me.) The more RAM you have, the faster they all run simultaneously.

Go 64-bit, and you can go beyond the 3.5Gb limit.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-03-2009, 07:14 PM
KD0DKI's Avatar
KD0DKI KD0DKI is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Excelsior MN.
Posts: 926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KA5ROW View Post
I Just installed Windows 7 on a separate hard drive to keep it as pure as I can with only 64 bit software. So I am assuming any software made for "Vista, 64 bit" should be compatible with Windows 7 as long as I use the 64 bit Ver. Yes or No.

I know IE 8 32 bit is on the Win 7 64 edition but the plan is to only install 64 bit software on that drive.
Windows XP, Vista, and 7 64bit
All use specific places within the file system and registry to store the information to run the 32bit and 64 bit applications. You will be hard pressed to find 64bit software that is inexpensive. Having a different drive does isolate the system but you will find getting information to and from the old install and the new install a pain in the backside.

Talking about browsers I love 64bit browsers, all the crap that is not able to run in a 64bit browser FAILS to run. I know this will be for a limited time but it is nice for now
__________________
KD0DKI Sam

UNIX/Linux/BSD these are a few of my favorite things.

and Beer.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:26 PM
KB3PXR's Avatar
KB3PXR KB3PXR is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FM19es
Posts: 483
Default

The only real reasons to keep 32-bit Windows around would be for one of two reasons. One is with drivers as 64-bit Windows does not like drivers for the 32-bit systems. The other is with the compatibility layer, in 64-bit Windows the 16-bit compatibility layer is replaced with the 32-bit compatibility layer. That means that I can't run any DOS or Win 3.11 or earlier programs (except Windows NT 3.5 or earlier I think) as they use 16-bit code (a win32 compatibility system was added so those programs may still work), I also can't use my Scanner as it was running on borrowed time driver wise anyway. My scanner only has a Win98 (SE unless the USB drivers were installed) and Windows 2000 drivers for it. My IR/Bluetooth dongle is similar, the bluetooth works fine with the Standard Windows driver (although it can't find drivers for some devices, they still work fine), the IR only has the XP (32-bit) and earlier drivers.

VERY IMPORTANT NOTE!: If you use a Palm OS device, you cannot connect it by USB to a 64-bit Windows Machine as there is no driver, some programs (on the Palm) use USB differently (like Pocket Tunes) so don't toss the cable. With Palm OS devices you must sync with Serial, IR, or Bluetooth. Kinda strange to do Bluetooth after a hard reset.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Copyright © 1995-2008 QRZ.COM