Quote:
Originally Posted by KF7AYS
Using a 32bit OS on a 64 bit machine is like driving a 1968 Camaro with four plugs removed. Unsatisfying at best.
|
Precisely. If you're buying a new computer and plan to go with XP, then you're simply limiting yourself. Same goes with any 32-bit version of Vista or Seven.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ6CEA
64-bit is backwords compatable with 32-bit processes, the dont play nicely though
|
64-bit Windows run what is called "WOW" (Windows on Windows). It's how the 64-bit kernel runs 32-bit apps. 99.99999% of all 32-bit apps run on 64-bit Windows.
If you have a Windows app that won't run on 64-bit Vista or Seven, then you have a 16-bit app. Time to upgrade.
And bear in mind, everyone, sticking to 32-bit is limiting in other ways. 2-Terrabyte drives are already shipping. If you expect to be able to use one with XP, you'll be running into the same wall Windows 98 did with 32Mb drives. XP can't address a 2Tb drive as one drive. Neither will any other 32-bit Windows OS - or for that matter, 32-bit Linux.
Same goes for RAM. 32-bit sees about 3.5Gb RAM maximum. We hams often run multiple windows at the same time. A browser; logger; SSTV and email all at once, for example. (Especially when you have dual screens like me.) The more RAM you have, the faster they all run simultaneously.
Go 64-bit, and you can go beyond the 3.5Gb limit.