QRZ Forums   QRZ Ad 1903
 
 Forum Home   QRZ Home 



QRZ Ad 1995

QRZ Ad 1440
QRZ Ad 2137
QRZ Ad 55

QRZ Ad 2144

QRZ Ad 2136

Google Search
 
QRZ Web




 

Donate to QRZ
Contributions Accepted

  #11  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:31 AM
K5OP's Avatar
K5OP K5OP is offline
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gautier, MS
Posts: 536
Default

I love my TS-2000! But if I had the money to spend, honestly, I'd buy a Yaesu FT-2000. But my TS-2000 is by far the best HF I've owned so far... It has the IF DSP filtering on it, and mine has been used in a couple of contests with a lot of time operating on it without any trouble at all. I've never had any trouble with hearing other stations. Out of all of the radios I've owned or operated, I'd give the TS-2000 a very high score. I would like to use a FT-2000 but after using the FT-950, I'd say the FT-2000 might be a better HF. But the kenwood has more features.

1100 dollars USED is about the right price.

My experiences owning and operating have been:

Swan 500C
Collins S-Line (32S-1/75S-1)
Kenwood TS-440S
Kenwood TS-450S
Kenwood TS-2000
Yaesu FT-100D

Operated:
Icom IC-745
Icom IC-756PROII
Icom IC-746PRO
Yaesu FT-1000D
Yaesu FT-1000MP
Yaesu FT-920
Yaesu FT-950

By the way, AL7AN, I'd really like to have a QSO with you one day and exchange reports. I very much would love to have worked your country. Qatar escapes me.
__________________
73! From Jimmy, K5OP
Magnolia DX Association
Webmaster: www.mdxa.org

Last edited by KB5FSV; 03-07-2008 at 08:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:50 AM
N6YG's Avatar
N6YG N6YG is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k9kjm View Post
The Kenwood TS 2000 is the best deal available for a "do it all" radio.
As already mentioned, The cross band feature, which also includes the ability to cross band from HF to UHF is worth it alone.
If a person could have but one radio, The TS 2000 IS that radio!
Around 1100 used to 1500 dollars US new.
The TS 2000 is designed to operate with the internal preamp ON for VHF/UHF. I think that is why some people seem to think it has receive sensitivity problems. It does NOT have receive sensitivity troubles........

However, For a CONTEST quality HF radio? You would be further off with something like a good used Icom 756PRO series in the same price range.
I hate to disagree with you but they do seem have receive sensitivity problems. I've owned both and compared to an FT-847 the TS-2000 is kind of deaf on VHF/UHF

If you are interested in Satellite or VHF/UHF weak signal work I would take an FT-847 hands down! over a TS-2000. Like I mentioned before I have owed them both and the FT-847's VHF/UHF receiver seems much better.
On the other had a stock TS-2000 is slightly better then the FT-847 on HF. But this easily correctable with a filter upgrade or a simple mod. Unfortunately most of the time used FT-847 sell for more then used TS-2000.. So unless you really need VHF/UHF SSB or satellite rig you could get away a lot cheaper buying a dedicated HF rig.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

The box said 'You need Windows XP or better' .... so I installed linux.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-07-2008, 12:19 PM
WZ0O's Avatar
WZ0O WZ0O is online now
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida Swamp
Posts: 218
Default

As the owner of both the FT-2000 and the TS-2000 I find little difference in the receivers both are good. The FT has more to pull stuff out of the mud but it hears about the same. If I could only have one the FT would be the keeper, but that said for the money the TS is one hell of a radio.
I use mine for digital,UHF and VHF. The duel receivers is a great feature and lets me listen to 6m or 2m while doing pks31 or rtty. The TS 2000 will do more then any radio out there right now. No its not as good as a 7800 but at $1614.00 NEW its a great buy.
Oh btw I would like a K3 but kids are still going to school so that one will have to wait.
__________________
Good Judgement comes from experience.
Experience comes from Bad Judgement.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:01 PM
A71AN's Avatar
A71AN A71AN is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Qatar
Posts: 1,883
Default Already been bought

I have already bought it today, I hope it will work ok

Thanks to every one partispated in this thread and wishing you all of the best

73
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:03 PM
KY5U's Avatar
KY5U KY5U is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12,199
Default

If I can help you in any way let me know. Send me a PM
__________________
KY5U
Ham Genius
-100 IQ Points
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:57 PM
A71AN's Avatar
A71AN A71AN is offline
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Qatar
Posts: 1,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ky5u View Post
If I can help you in any way let me know. Send me a PM
Thank you very much my friend, you been very helpful, I connected it to the power supply but not yet, connected it to the antenna, I will have small operation in my stomach early in the morning, when I get released from Hospital, I will try to connect it.

Best regards from Qatar my friend

73
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-07-2008, 04:54 PM
N7BUI N7BUI is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 151
Default

Lots of differing opinions on the TS-2000.

I've had three of them. Every one of them suffered from a noisey HF receiver. The symptom was very high white noise in the background with no antenna connected.

Yes after an antenna was connected the signals would overcome the noise and it became tolerable. I did the band-pass diode mod to two of them and it really does make a difference. The background white noise dropped off quite a bit.

For versatility this radio is second to none. That is it's major selling point. It is the best shack-in-a-box made.

The HF noise and the birdie on 436.800 (sorry Kenwood there is NO excuse for having an S-9 plus signal on a major downlink frequency of satellites), finally convinced me to go back to an FT-847 for sats, and a different radio for HF.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-08-2008, 10:57 AM
WS2L's Avatar
WS2L WS2L is online now
Super Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: New Jersey (FN20)
Posts: 3,361
Default

I have owned my TS2000 since 2004 and have used it extensively on HF and VHF/UHF. For a while I was using the main band to run an Echolink node on 146.550 and am currently using the sub band for APRS.

Since I just moved to a new QTH I only have a 2 meter vertical set up so I operate through the club repeater on the main and APRS on the sub band. Once I get a nice day I will get all of my antennas back up. Prior to moving though I was using the rig pretty much on 144 and 432 MHz SSB & CW and it performs well. I only really operated 40 and 20 meters other than contests but overall am very satisfied with this rig. If I had to I would buy another one only this time the TS2000X model with 1.2 GHz in it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:27 PM
KY5U's Avatar
KY5U KY5U is online now
Ham Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a71an View Post
Thank you very much my friend, you been very helpful, I connected it to the power supply but not yet, connected it to the antenna, I will have small operation in my stomach early in the morning, when I get released from Hospital, I will try to connect it.

Best regards from Qatar my friend

73
Hope all is well. Let us know how you fared.
__________________
KY5U
Ham Genius
-100 IQ Points
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Copyright © 1995-2008 QRZ.COM