Callsign
ad: W2RE-1
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Please help a new ham

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-ezhang
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-innov
ad: l-gcopper
  1. #11

    Default

    SWR bridge is bad.

    Borrow a known-good SWR bridge and 50 ohm dummy load. Test out the rig into it.

    73 de Jim, N2EY

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Melbourn FL and Lewisburg OH
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Congratulations on the new ticket, Sean. The TS-520 is a neat little rig and I used one for many years with no problem whatsoever. I'm betting with all the others that the SWR bridge isn't doing the job for you. The MFJ tuner should be fine and is very popular. I use MFJ test gear to tune my antennas and find it more than adequate.
    73, Gary K4FY

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    258

    Default

    Here's the Breaker 13-500:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/BREAKER-MODE...-/130720541880

    I see these all the time under various brand names: Sears, Phillco, etc. I assume they were all made by the same company because they all look alike.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KK6RF View Post
    Here's the Breaker 13-500:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/BREAKER-MODE...-/130720541880

    I see these all the time under various brand names: Sears, Phillco, etc. I assume they were all made by the same company because they all look alike.
    While marketed to the "CB" crowd, that doesn't mean they are useless. If they check out properly with a dummy load, (symmetrically, both forward and reverse) they can be used in the Amateur Service, at least to 30 MHz, and at 100 Watts or less.

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WA9SVD View Post
    While marketed to the "CB" crowd, that doesn't mean they are useless. If they check out properly with a dummy load, (symmetrically, both forward and reverse) they can be used in the Amateur Service, at least to 30 MHz, and at 100 Watts or less.
    I agree. It might be junk, but it might be useful.

    I had a "Midland" brand SWR bridge marketed to the CB crowd in the 60s that was actually pretty good up to 144 MHz and handled several hundred watts just fine. But they're all different. It pays to compare to some known standard.
    A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

    -- George Bernard Shaw

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Temple City, CA
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Again thanks for all the replies. Today I bought a MFJ-949E and will be testing it tomorrow and hope to make my first contact on HF soon.
    Sean Hawkes
    KJ6TIE

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Temple City, CA
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KJ6TIE View Post
    Again thanks for all the replies. Today I bought a MFJ-949E and will be testing it tomorrow and hope to make my first contact on HF soon.
    Made my first contact on HF yesterday on 20 meters, hope it just the first of many. Again thanks for all your input, hopfully someday I will also be able to help a new ham get started.
    Sean Hawkes
    KJ6TIE

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •