Callsign
ad: w5yi
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: ? About testing 572Bs , is this a viable method ?

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-rl
ad: l-innov
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-tentec
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-Heil
ad: l-WarrenG

Contribute
to QRZ

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    6,069

    Default

    It is a bummer that you got sent some bad tubes.

    Can you share who you bought them from so we can steer clear ?

    Your tester seems close if you are getting a reading of 42, on the 811 settings. A good 572 may read a little less and be considered good. 36 is good for the 811. The only difference in the 572 and the 811 for that tester will be the reading that you get. Everything else will be the same setting.

    You may want to let the seller know, and get some new ones, without getting paypal involved. I would try that first.

    Good Luck.

    73
    .
    Last edited by KA9JLM; 04-30-2012 at 08:46 PM.
    "Theory only works perfect in a vacuum." KA9JLM Don

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Mpls. , MN.
    Posts
    4,004

    Default

    Well I may post his info , but several issues 1st , not knowing enough to be sure of all the facts , thats why the thread .
    Then after gather more info , the thread .
    Then getting back to him with what I think I learned and try to settle any issues with the deal .
    Then lastly involving PayPal .
    But with him having a lot of sales , and repair site in the net , I would hope he would have better info than me ?
    The last thing I would want to do , is make accusations with my ignorance of the subject .
    Thanks again

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    6,069

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KD0CAC View Post
    Well I may post his info , but several issues 1st , not knowing enough to be sure of all the facts , thats why the thread .
    Then after gather more info , the thread .
    Then getting back to him with what I think I learned and try to settle any issues with the deal .
    Then lastly involving PayPal .
    But with him having a lot of sales , and repair site in the net , I would hope he would have better info than me ?
    The last thing I would want to do , is make accusations with my ignorance of the subject .
    Thanks again
    It does seem that the seller needs a better way of checking tubes.

    Normally a tube tester will tell you if a tube is bad, But may not tell you for sure if it is good.

    When a tube is in the operating circuit it may operate different than in a tester.

    All the tubes should check about the same in your tester, if they are close to good.
    Sounds like you did get some duds. That is a chance you take when you buy used parts.

    73
    "Theory only works perfect in a vacuum." KA9JLM Don

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Mpls. , MN.
    Posts
    4,004

    Default

    Without reading what I have posted , I take a chance and restate .
    I got 5 tubes from the one guy , and 2 tubes with no claims from the other guy I traded the amp for .
    The 2 that came with the amp , 1 was a chineez that tested at 19 , the other a Centron that tested at 42 .
    Then the set of 5 were Penta -10 , Ratheon -32 , Centron red label -32 , Centron red label -36 and Centron blue label 46 .
    These were using the data book for 811s on the TV-7 .
    Then since this was an unknown amp , repairs not finished by the last guy , and never worked since he got it , I used the lowest rated tubes , in match pairs just incase , to not damage good tubes and got response from amp , but no output - did not expect any .
    Then tried middle rated , 32s very little output , good sign the amp is OK now .
    So used the best tubes - 42 & 46 and got output of about 450 watts SSB , so now the amp seems good , but I am going to check the tuning coils , and have a couple tubes .

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Mpls. , MN.
    Posts
    4,004

    Default

    Well except for my results of no output for the tubes in question , now I am not sure again .
    The latest explanation of his testing sounds good to me ?

    quote - " Not testing for shorts. A tube is just like a transistor, only its high impedance instead of low.
    When the filament heats the cathode, electrons will flow to the anode (Plate). As the signal increases on the cathode, it is amplified by varying the plate. The test I did showed how much the tube would conduct. As the resistance went lower, the tube was conducting harder. (sign of a working tube.) Again, each tube was tested in circuit this way. A transistor works the same way, only no filament... signal is applied on the base. a bias voltage is applied to the emitter, bias's the the transistor on and the collector amplifies the signal. This is the simple definitional, but describes the basic operation. Have been involved in electronics for almost 50 years now, and all circuits work pretty much the same way. "

  6. #16

    Default

    I think you're simply measuring the conductance of the tube while driven with a signal . . . the poorer the emission, the higher the resistance.

    The best way to check any power handling tube is to sub it into a working amplifier circuit, and note grid drive and plate current, and measure RF output with a good calibrated wattmeter (IMHO that translates into a Bird 43). Generally, as these tubes age, the emission drops and the output goes with it.

    Since most of these tubes are capable of more than 50-100 ma plate current, the average tube tester doesn't test with this high of current. Only the amplifier (circuit) does . . . .

    That what we do in broadcasting -- check 'pulls' against a new tube, and keep the ones that work, albeit at the lower end of their useful life.

    Gary WA7KKP

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KD0CAC View Post
    Well except for my results of no output for the tubes in question , now I am not sure again .
    The latest explanation of his testing sounds good to me ?

    quote - " Not testing for shorts. A tube is just like a transistor, only its high impedance instead of low.
    When the filament heats the cathode, electrons will flow to the anode (Plate). As the signal increases on the cathode, it is amplified by varying the plate. The test I did showed how much the tube would conduct. As the resistance went lower, the tube was conducting harder. (sign of a working tube.) Again, each tube was tested in circuit this way. A transistor works the same way, only no filament... signal is applied on the base. a bias voltage is applied to the emitter, bias's the the transistor on and the collector amplifies the signal. This is the simple definitional, but describes the basic operation. Have been involved in electronics for almost 50 years now, and all circuits work pretty much the same way. "
    It sort of makes sense,in that,all an Ohmmeter really consists of,is a voltage source with an ammeter in series,calibrated in resistance,instead of amps,or milliamps.
    If you ran the filaments & connected the Ohmmeter with the lead producing a +ve voltage on the anode,& the other lead on the cathode with no bias on the grid,the thing should give a reading of some kind.
    A DMM probably wouldn't work,but an old analog one would probably do so,as the test voltage is higher.
    You could then measure a good tube,& compare the bad ones,but the whole idea freaks me out.It seems very much reliant on guesswork!

    WA7KKP's method is a good one,& is indeed what is used in Broadcasting.
    In all my years in that field,I have never seen a gadget for testing transmitting tubes,(apart from little ones,like 6146s,which can be tested on normal tube testers).
    We always tested them in the Transmitter.

    73,VK6ZGO

  8. #18

    Default

    95% of tube testers cannot properly test power transmitting tubes such as 572's 811's etc. They are not capable of loading the tube under test heavy enough to test its power output and gain. I see lots of claims of tubes tested with ohm meters etc.... worthless test! Buyer beware.

    Don.

  9. #19

    Default

    vk6zgo:

    with the prices of some ham fest special transmitting tubes reaching over a kilobuck, a means of testing them on site it handy.
    I have a homebrew portable transmitting tube tester that consist of a small 40 meter transmitter and multi socketed amplifier to plug in most popular transmitting tubes and test them on site. you must have 110 ac available, which most hamfest do.

    It loads and test tubes to the 5 to 600 watt level which is a reliable test. One guy came up at a hamfest with a big ceramic tetrode with handles on it and ask me to test it. I grinned and pointed down the street to the local broadcast station and said "try them".

    73, Don.

  10. #20

    Default

    The common "tube tester" - whether it incorporates the mutual conductance method or not - simply does not have what it takes to truly test a transmitting tube.

    The tube tester, can, however, serve as a good Go-NoGo screen before inserting tubes into a real transmitter into dummy load to check output and its a good idea to perform such tube check first as it can prevent you from inserting a shorted tube into your transmitter or amplifier, causing possible circuit damage.

    73

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •