Callsign
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: use of 146.520 MHz FM simplex calling frequency ?

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-ezhang
ad: l-innov
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ORANGE CNTY, CA
    Posts
    664

    Default use of 146.520 MHz FM simplex calling frequency ?

    I am wondering, how should I use 146.520 MHz FM simplex calling frequency ? do I need to use like Marine VHF CH16 ? which is 146.520 MHz should be used briefly to establish communication, or calling other station, once communication is established, need to move off to other simplex frequency ? is there any rule or tradition on usage ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Mary's County, Maryland
    Posts
    5,746

    Default

    Yes, that is the definition of a calling frequency.

    That said, if you live in the boondocks and the frequency is never used, it's not unheard of to just stay on the frequency and have at your QSO.
    "Lossy Traps, Oh my!"
    "Supporting AMSAT-NA Fox-1 Cubesat Launch in 2013!"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    16,791

    Default

    There are different philosophies. One argument for not ragchewing on the calling frequency is that if people ragchew there, nobody will monitor it, which may well be part of the problem.

    We have some people here who ragchew there on occasion, and I hear some from the middle of Wisconsin fairly often, too. The funniest thing is that people will make contact on the local repeater and move off that to .52. The most active simplex users around here use to be on 146.58, but I haven't heard much there recently.

    146.52 is not a lost cause. I do hear people using it when I travel, more often that you'd expect, and sometimes out in the midst of noplace, too. It's always in my scan list.
    EchoLink, IRLP and DSTAR - adding interest to repeaters worldwide 24X7

  4. #4

    Default

    Last summer I worked a guy in Illinois on a fluke e-skip or something. He held 52 making long distance contacts, keeping them short and on to the next guy. Sounds like he was having fun, and because many monitor 52, was able to work em.
    I say....If your working a pile up on 52......keep going until your done!!!
    Mike
    if you say "gullible" slowly, it sounds like oranges.

  5. #5

    Default

    Channel 16 is different from .52, it's also monitored as an emergency channel so you make your contact and move quickly to another chanel. I think channel 9 is a more relaxed calling channel. .52 is calling channel but not usually too busy, go ahead and make short friendly qso's. This might help drum up more activity. If you need to make longer more serious or regularly scheduled qso's go ahead and move to a different frequency. At least that's my phylosophy.

    73,
    Ed

  6. #6

    Default

    My opinion on any "calling frequency" is to go ahead and have a QSO on the frequency. Especially on the SSB "calling frequencies", this can be an indication that the band is actually open. However, do not make "long winded" transmissions and leave plenty of time before the next station transmits to allow other stations a chance to "break in".

    Glen, K9STH

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    5,269

    Default

    I figure calling frequency ends up in QSO, so all is good. Generally given the usage of 52 there isn't a problem.
    Leroy
    Be sure to listen for my beacon on 28.278.8 MHz

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Wonder Lake, IL
    Posts
    1,093

    Default

    It is like any other "calling frequency"; use it but be aware that it *is* a calling frequency and leave a lot of time between transmissions in case others want to use it. If you foresee a long winded ragchew ahead, best to move off. Like most I like to see some calling frequency activity as often many listen without transmitting and hard to see openings but if there is an opening, hogging the calling frequency is not desirable.

    73,

    Bill N9DSJ

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    3,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AG6JU View Post
    I am wondering, how should I use 146.520 MHz FM simplex calling frequency ? do I need to use like Marine VHF CH16 ? which is 146.520 MHz should be used briefly to establish communication, or calling other station, once communication is established, need to move off to other simplex frequency ? is there any rule or tradition on usage ?
    I would say if the Frequency is not in use then you can use it freely.

    If it is busy just break in politely using your call sign, then move the party that you are calling to another frequency.

    It is as a normal simplex frequency in these parts.
    "Books tell how it should be, Experience tells how it really is..."
    73 DE KA9JLM Don

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    12,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KA9JLM View Post
    I would say if the Frequency is not in use then you can use it freely.

    If it is busy just break in politely using your call sign, then move the party that you are calling to another frequency.

    It is as a normal simplex frequency in these parts.
    That is what we do here. If someone wants to use the frequency to make a call we will move off to 58 or just stand by. Either way it's always polite to relinquish a calling frequency if asked. I would like to hear more simplex activity around here. In fact, I would like to se a resurgence of 2 meter AM simplex. There is a ton of really nice and very inexpensive old 2 meter AM gear available.
    i'm sorry you don't have the experience or understanding to realize that others possess a skill set that you seem to dismiss as fantastical.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •