Callsign

View Poll Results: What is your prefered source for QSLing?

Voters
178. You may not vote on this poll
  • Direct

    77 43.26%
  • Lotw

    74 41.57%
  • QRZ.com

    17 9.55%
  • eQSL

    49 27.53%
  • Other electronic service

    1 0.56%
  • All of the above

    17 9.55%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Lotw, QRZ.com, eQSL, Direct

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-ezhang
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-innov
  1. #1

    Default Lotw, QRZ.com, eQSL, Direct

    Here is a question that comes from my laziness to maintain logs. After all these years, this year I have decided to keep accurate logs and ask for QSL instead of waiting to be asked. Heck I might get an award or something.

    Anyway, now that I keep a paper log and electronic logs I have noticed through QSL sent to return ratios that I dont seem to have a high return rate. I use Lotw, QRZ.com, and eQSL, and I always send paper.

    Is this due to a number of hams who maybe don't care to respond? or would it be some hams don't prefer direct or online QSLing?

    Don't get me wrong I am not complaining, it just seems that if someone asks QSL sould they not respond when sent a card?

    Ace, KB7FHK

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Central NY
    Posts
    1,528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KB7FHK View Post
    Here is a question that comes from my laziness to maintain logs. After all these years, this year I have decided to keep accurate logs and ask for QSL instead of waiting to be asked. Heck I might get an award or something.

    Anyway, now that I keep a paper log and electronic logs I have noticed through QSL sent to return ratios that I dont seem to have a high return rate. I use Lotw, QRZ.com, and eQSL, and I always send paper.

    Is this due to a number of hams who maybe don't care to respond? or would it be some hams don't prefer direct or online QSLing?

    Don't get me wrong I am not complaining, it just seems that if someone asks QSL sould they not respond when sent a card?

    Ace, KB7FHK
    Some go through a Bureau which can take a while...
    73
    de Jim
    N2ADV
    (ex KD2BIP)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Posts
    1,055

    Default

    I QSL direct w/ SASE or return postage costs, but I like collecting QSLs and pretty much need them all confirmed

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    374

    Default

    Buro! This was not listed as a choice in this poll...
    73,
    John

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Topanga Canyon, California
    Posts
    2,302

    Default

    Funny how eQSL seems "fake" to me. I confirm them as a courtesy, but they don't rock my world like cards or even LoTW.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    288

    Default

    I use all of them. My "Other Electronic Service" is HRDLOG.net.

    If I get a confirmation on LOTW, I don't send a card. I started out sending every contact a card, that got expensive so I have slowed down on that a bit.

    I really could care less about EQSL, QRZ.com or HRDlog.net. I use them as a courtesy so others can get the confirmations & awards they desire.

    If you want awards, you'll have to decide if you want them from the ARRL or EQSL. If it's the ARRL, LOTW is a no-brainer and will save you some money unless you really like to get the cards. If the answer is EQSL, you will want the Authenticity Guaranteed which if I remember you'll have to send them a copy of your license (I think thats how I did it).

    One thing about LOTW, if you send your cards off for an award and they get lost in the mail, well your up the creek. You won't have to send off near as many if you also have LOTW. You may not even have to send anything. I had 49 confirmed for WAS and had to send just one card in.

    Jon

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    16,879

    Default

    I do LoTW and eQSL, and also use the QRZ log service. I'm just casually gathering confirmations and will collect the awards when they are earned. I think I still need Wyoming on several bands for LoTW.
    EchoLink, IRLP and DSTAR - adding interest to repeaters worldwide 24X7

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Topanga Canyon, California
    Posts
    2,302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WD0MYM View Post
    started out sending every contact a card, that got expensive so I have slowed down on that a bit.
    You have really nice cards, Jon. I treasure mine. 73, Eric

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    288

    Default

    Thanks Eric, UX5UO...they (Gennady) or whoever designed it. I sent them a picture of rocks and they designed it at $0.00 cost. Yours looks great also!

    Ace, maybe something more important at this point is how you are logging the contacts. I would suggest the logbook that comes with Ham radio Deluxe but quite frankly, its the only electronic logbook I have ever used. If you don't really use Ham radio Deluxe you might find something more useful. Make sure that however you are logging these contacts that they are compatible with LOTW, EQSL, etc. The ADIF file that HRD generates is compatible with all of them. I would ask around and choose something that works well.

    As long as you are logging everything correctly you can sign up to any of these services anytime you want and just upload your log.

    Be sure to backup your log somewhere safe so when the computer crashes you'll be safe. Backup often. I actually E-Mail my logs to myself and pretty much up to date if I have a problem.

    Jon

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Carrollton, TX
    Posts
    31

    Default

    When I changed calls last summer I figured it was time to get on the stick with a logging program (Aether Log for the Mac). To re-enter the previous 40 years was more than I wanted to think about so I started with a clean slate. Now that I'm e-logging everything, eQsl and LOTW are a snap so I use them both.
    The Ham formerly known as WA5VQM

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •