Body Scanners on Streets Next?

[AF6LJ]

Mike you have to read the story from the beginning. This guy was fighting with his wife, she called the police and went out the front door. He followed her out the front door and continued to fight with her. The police who were called to that location arrived, as they did, the husband pulled the wife into the house, yelled to the police they were not needed and slammed the door. The police now concerned about the well being of the wife, enter the house. The husband blocked the police from entering and attacked the officer. The officer then tazed him.

The only defense his attorney presented to the court for the domestic battery and the battery to the Officer, was that the Police did not have a warrant. The criminal court Judge convicted the husband for the domestic and the battery of the Officer. The judge explained that there were special circumstances (the safety of the wife). He ruled that the Police had the right to enter the without a warrant and that the husband did not have the right to stop them or attack them.

In this case the police had every right to do what they did.
The woman was in danger, called the police and they responded to her call for help.
Since she cohabits there she has prevailing right and by calling the police gave them not only PC to enter the house had the fight not spilled into the street but they were allowed to enter also because they were in persute of the man in question as he was suspected of DV.

[W9OE]

[QUOTE=KC9IUX;2448989]So much for "I'm done"

I would never pass up an opportunity to chat and exchange ideas with you Chris. Sometimes I agree and sometimes I don't. That's what keeps it interesting now isn't it. Thanks for the press clips. Hows things in MC?

[KC9IUX]

[QUOTE=W9OE;2449606]

So much for "I'm done"

I would never pass up an opportunity to chat and exchange ideas with you Chris. Sometimes I agree and sometimes I don't. That's what keeps it interesting now isn't it. Thanks for the press clips. Hows things in MC?

Lol, thanks. Sorry for calling you a fool, it was in jest but I guess it didn't translate well.

My mailing addy is MC, but I live way south of town, 10 acres that I need to try to put up a big loop on. Hellbilly life and I enjoy it. Shoot guns, have fires and see the wildlife and feed them. Won't shoot any of them, just targets. I lack the heart to do that. I hope the Windy is good to you.

[KI4NGN]

"What the ruling does not do. It does not circumvent the Constitution or the Bill of Right."
If the ruling is that a state employee can enter your home for any reason at any time it is indeed a violation of the US Constitution. The constitution states the government must obtain a warrant listing the places, items, or people to be searched for. The constitution nowhere states that the government can enter private property without a warrant. You can pretend you don't live in a police state, but you do.

Ever heard of the The Fourth Amendment? It allows entry without a warrant if there is probable cause of the commission of a crime.

How about if someone breaks into your home and starts beating the living crap out of you after you call 911? Do you think they'd be violating your rights if they waited to get a warrant before entering your home to save your life?

If you're so sure you are living in a police state, then I suggest you leave before they become so entrenched that you won't be able to.

If you don't leave, then I can only surmise that you don't believe what you sometimes spew out into this forum about our country, which makes you a troll.