|
|
-
EZENEC or MMANA - user opinions wanted
I just finished my latest modeled design and have some reservations about MMANA.
If I recall correctly, the free EZENEC has some limits and that is why I switched to MMANA.
I am happy with the results of MMANA, however, it seems to work rather unpredictably even on simplest , plain dipole, design.
For example – it changes the dipole dimension when I just want to “run it” , without implementing any optimizer values.
I am communicating with the MMANA user group and getting answers for specific questions.
But this got me stumped.
Did I messed something up or is this normal?
Any constructive comments will be greatly appreciated, but no lectures on how to calculate dipole length in cubits , please (HI HI)
73 Vaclav
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|