Callsign
ad: dxeng
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Transworld TW4040 and TW2010 - Compact vertical dipole - 40 meters

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-innov
ad: l-rl
ad: l-tentec
  1. #1

    Default Transworld TW4040 and TW2010 - Compact vertical dipole - 40 meters

    Hello,

    I have a Transworld TW2010 antenna with both the 2010 multiband center section and the 40 meter center section. These are roughly 6 foot high capacitively hatted vertical dipoles - a sideways H in appearance. Mine is mounted 6 feet off the ground at its base.

    The antenna is assembled in minutes, snapping together without tools, yet very solid once locked in place. Mechanically, the antennas are a work of art. Very well designed for compact installation, storage, portability. I don't know about backpacking with it, but I don't really backpack...

    I'd been using the 2010 for some time and recently switched to the 40 meter center section. I purchased the 40M section mainly thinking it could be helpful as a portable some day, not thinking it could really be effective (read on).

    In parallel with this antenna, I've tried a few of makeshift dipoles (using an antenna tuner) and a rain gutter which serve as constrained comparisons. All of the makeshift antennas were good enough for a few contacts at least.

    The Transworld 2010 - mostly on 20 meters - has been very impressive. Running at 100 watts, I've had a fair number of good signal reports. It outperforms all of my other antenna experiments by at least 6 db and sometimes more -- even antennas several times its size. It also picks up less noise. The rain gutter has a weird pattern, but the best signals were still at least 6 db down from the TW - and I don't dare run QRO with the rain gutter (or I'd buy a higher power tuner).

    Recently, I put the 40 meter section in place. I didn't expect much. However, running about 800 watts, I've been astonished at the performance. With a fairly noisy band, I've had QSOs (from south Florida) to mobiles in LA and many other places around the country. On my other antennas, 40M was adjacent states only -- I ignored the band. After several QSOs, I've had people calling out to me for follow on contacts.

    I know this isn't a 40M beam or even a dipole at 1/2 L in height, but having a credible presence on 40 meters from such a small antenna is very impressive to me. The fact that it supports 1200 W (SSB PEP) lets you dig partly out of the compact antenna hole.

    Before choosing ( or even finding ) Transworld, after extensive reading, I had decided that capacitively hatted verticals were probably my best bet. Magnetic loops sounded interesting (for their size), but I don't like the power limitations.

    This is not a miracle antenna, but it is a well built and well engineered antenna, performing exceedingly well for its size. I don't think you can do better in a similarly sized antenna.

    Great job Transworld.

    73... W4LI - Dan Hoogterp

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    17

    Default

    I've been using the Transworld Backpacker for the past three months in what is not an ideal ham location: urban environment, about a mile from the Empire State Building. It's thirty feet up, but surrounded by much larger NY buildings. Nonetheless, it gets out: Latin America/Europe, on less than 100 watts. It has a low profile, a necessity in NY coop buildings, with the antenna police at the ready. I have found it to outperform virtually any other antenna I have used in my circumstances.
    I can recommend this antenna to anyone who finds himself limited by location, as I am.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •