Callsign
ad: abrind-1
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: 40m Rotary Dipole Or vertical

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-innov
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-ezhang
  1. #1

    Default 40m Rotary Dipole Or vertical

    Hi All

    I'am Dave and i have now a inverted V dipole at 60 feet hi. I have two options

    1. Rotary dipole at 72 feet high
    2. 1/4 Vertical with radials (30 pieces for beginning)

    All Info is welcome

    Dave ON7TZ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Rosevale, Drummanduff, New Inn, Ballyjamesduff, Co.Cavan, Ireland.
    Posts
    831

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HFRF View Post
    I would keep what you have. Not much gained by a 12 feet higher dipole. Verticals suck without lots of radials and the strongest radiation from a ground mounted vertical is at 4 inches above ground, Rotary dipoles are good if only one center support is available but these dipoles also have much greater wind resistance than wire dipoles and they come down easier in wind storms. Other than these issues, do what you like since all antennas installed correctly should work well.
    I agree.

    Kind Regards

    Fred EI4GMB
    'You can never plan the future by the past.'

    'Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it.'

    'But what is liberty without wisdom, and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness without tuition or restraint.'

    Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Irish statesman, author, orator, political theorist and philosopher.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    206

    Default

    1/4 wave vert. with radials, works pretty well for DX. I've worked quite a bit of DX on a S9v 31'

    Keep the inv V and install a 1/4 vert with as many radials as you can,length doesn't matter as much as quantity

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Rosevale, Drummanduff, New Inn, Ballyjamesduff, Co.Cavan, Ireland.
    Posts
    831

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KB0NAZ View Post
    I've worked quite a bit of DX on a S9v 31'
    When used with a proper ground system the S9v 31' is certainly a serious DX antenna!

    73

    Fred EI4GMB
    'You can never plan the future by the past.'

    'Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it.'

    'But what is liberty without wisdom, and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness without tuition or restraint.'

    Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Irish statesman, author, orator, political theorist and philosopher.

  5. #5

    Default

    Dunno, with a rotary dipole at 72' you could certainly rotate it to null out interference, that might be a point in it's favor.
    You pays your money and takes your chances: The contents of this posting are personal opinions. Persons trying to find motive, plot, logic, truth or beauty will be punshed severely under law.

  6. #6

    Default

    It depends on the environment. But, an inverted V by design has some interference from it's supporting structure, not to mention a compromise in the pattern.

    A rotatable dipole at that height on 40m would kick butt.

    You will also get a bit of ability to peak and null a few db off the sides/front/back
    /**************************
    Charley K1DNR. Website

    HRD Real Time Log Book

    QRZ Log Book

    http://www.qrz.com/db/K1DNR
    ****************************/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Shropshire. England.
    Posts
    14,814

    Default

    Knowing that Belgium is flat, that dipole at 72 feet could be the highest point in Belgium ! Only kidding ! As for the nulling out of interference, it would need something like a Faraday cage in Europe.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G0GQK View Post
    Knowing that Belgium is flat, that dipole at 72 feet could be the highest point in Belgium ! Only kidding ! As for the nulling out of interference, it would need something like a Faraday cage in Europe.
    A dipole at that height should have a 6db null off the the ends. That's one "standard" S-unit. Nothing to sneeze at really. The other way of thinking of it is halving those signals twice...
    /**************************
    Charley K1DNR. Website

    HRD Real Time Log Book

    QRZ Log Book

    http://www.qrz.com/db/K1DNR
    ****************************/

  9. #9

    Default

    So a vertical 1/4 wave will works better then?
    Otherwise I keep my inverted V antenna works also VK,ZL,JA,4S ETC africa, south america ,north america even west-coast so if the vertical will work not better the i keep
    my inverted v i think

    DAVE

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Rosevale, Drummanduff, New Inn, Ballyjamesduff, Co.Cavan, Ireland.
    Posts
    831

    Default

    Hi Dave,

    If my inverted V antenna worked VK,ZL,JA,4S,Africa, South America, North America and the west coast I would keep it! I don't think a 1/4 wave vertical is going to do much better. Hope this helps. Best of luck.

    Kind Regards

    Fred EI4GMB
    'You can never plan the future by the past.'

    'Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it.'

    'But what is liberty without wisdom, and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness without tuition or restraint.'

    Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Irish statesman, author, orator, political theorist and philosopher.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •