Callsign
ad: NI4L-1
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SB-220 Schematic by N0SS

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-innov
ad: l-sarc
ad: l-rl
ad: l-tentec
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-WarrenG
ad: l-Waters
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Midwest City, OK 73130
    Posts
    160

    Default SB-220 Schematic by N0SS

    Many of us out on the web looking for a schematic for the SB-220/221 schematic, Tom Hammond, N0SS has graciously done a redraw of this iconic amp.

    However, there is one crucial and very important error in this drawing in the power supply section, where the 10 amp curcuit breakers are placed AFTER the voltage selection barrier strip instead of properly placing it BEFORE the barrier strip. This error in the schematic will still leave voltage energized inside BOTH transformers if jumpered for 120v operation, and provides NO interruption of voltage as designed.

    Anyone using this drawing for a basis for power supply wiring should be made aware of this potentially lethal error.
    Last edited by K5DBX; 01-20-2011 at 08:52 PM.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K5DBX View Post
    Many of us out on the web looking for a schematic for the SB-220/221 schematic, Tom Hammond, N0SS has graciously done a redraw of this iconic amp.

    However, there is one crucial and very important error in this drawing in the power supply section, where the 10 amp curcuit breakers are placed AFTER the voltage selection barrier strip instead of properly placing it BEFORE the barrier strip. This error in the schematic will still leave voltage energized inside BOTH transformers if jumpered for 120v operation, and provides NO interruption of voltage as designed.

    Anyone using this drawing for a basis for power supply wiring should be made aware of this potentially lethal error.
    Good catch. But, it wasn't Tom/NØSS who made the error. It was Heathkit who made the error. From the same manual, the schematic and assembly drawing (attached), you can see the circuit breakers are not wired the same.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Midwest City, OK 73130
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WA7PRC View Post
    Good catch. But, it wasn't Tom/NØSS who made the error. It was Heathkit who made the error. From the same manual, the schematic and assembly drawing (attached), you can see the circuit breakers are not wired the same.
    Thanks for showing that. This is the print I have from 1976.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #4

    Post

    David -

    Tom does accept and receive e-mail messages.
    N0SS at ARRL dot NET

    I have regularly sent him data on amplified Motorola speakers,
    especially when I find paper documentation of later production changes on the same model number!!
    http://www.n0ss.net/

    Have you sent him this observation on the Heathkit SB-220 schematic for correction or adding the additional notation on his redrawn schematics???

    I would have taken that step FIRST, before posting here on QRZ -- THEN linking to the corrected information so the entire amateur community
    could immediately benefit. That is my standard operating procedure.


    w9gb
    Nullius in verba

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K5DBX View Post
    Thanks for showing that. This is the print I have from 1976.
    The documentation I found came from the 'net (unknown year). My SB-220 manual (©1969) is the same. Apparently, they fixed it somewhere between those years.

    Quote Originally Posted by W9GB View Post
    Tom does accept and receive e-mail messages.
    N0SS at ARRL dot NET

    Have you sent him this observation on the Heathkit SB-220 schematic for correction or adding the additional notation on his redrawn schematics???
    Good idea!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Midwest City, OK 73130
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by W9GB View Post
    David -

    Tom does accept and receive e-mail messages.
    N0SS at ARRL dot NET

    I have regularly sent him data on amplified Motorola speakers,
    especially when I find paper documentation of later production changes on the same model number!!
    http://www.n0ss.net/

    Have you sent him this observation on the Heathkit SB-220 schematic for correction or adding the additional notation on his redrawn schematics???

    I would have taken that step FIRST, before posting here on QRZ -- THEN linking to the corrected information so the entire amateur community
    could immediately benefit. That is my standard operating procedure.

    w9gb
    Before this thread goes south, which was not my intent, let me state this. I have sent Tom an email before posting here, and this ISN'T a slam on Tom or anyone for that matter. Tom faithfully reproduced the original drawing from Heath, and graciously has spent his time and energy in that effort. He should be commended.

    The only thing I was concerned with was safety. And somewhere between the SB-220 and the SB-221, I think maybe Heath realized that.

    The purpose of this thread was to simply to inform of potential hazards on one of the most popular second hand amps out there in the "boat anchor" market.
    Last edited by K5DBX; 01-23-2011 at 12:11 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Midwest City, OK 73130
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WA7PRC View Post
    The documentation I found came from the 'net (unknown year). My SB-220 manual (©1969) is the same. Apparently, they fixed it somewhere between those years.
    Well Bryan, I'm seriously considering changing the line protection from a thermal device (circuit breaker) to a fused configuration. I can understand the thought process of placing the breakers after the voltage selction barrier strip, from a current perspective, using a single 10 amp breaker-per-side solution for both 120v and 240v operation and placing it after the voltage selection barrier, and that's okay until you actually have a problem with the transformer in 120v operation. If the breaker trips on one side, the other side is still engergized. By using a fused solution before the terminal strip would allow for fast-acting fuses and allow one to use 10 amp fuses for 240v operation, and 20 amp for 120v operation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •