Callsign
ad: N3WG-1
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Listening to GSM phone calls

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-innov
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-ezhang
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Wantage, NJ, USA FN21qf
    Posts
    18,517

    Default Listening to GSM phone calls

    http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...n-gsm-call.ars

    Reminds me of the good old days of listening to AMPS phones. Illegal in the US of course, but I didn't live in the US at that time.

    Just remember, if it's transmitted over the air there is absolutely no guarantee of it being private.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    harms way
    Posts
    8,363

    Default

    this kind of thing will fall under the purview of department of fatherland spying and constitutes terrorismses
    now with true viterbi decoder!

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N0SYA View Post
    this kind of thing will fall under the purview of department of fatherland spying and constitutes terrorismses
    I agree 100%

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Clearwater, FL
    Posts
    3,617

    Cool

    Good Lord!

    I did everything I could to convince my neighbor that I wasn't causing her kids cancer when I put my tower up, and she also thought I was listening in on her cell phone calls!!

    Thanks, Ryan. Now she's gonna stir up trouble again!!

    Can't get no peace . . . .
    ex-W4DFW Ham since 1970. ARRL Life Member and Volunteer Counsel

    My QSO Map

    Online logbook

  5. #5

    Default Cell phone sickos

    Who has so little to do that they would even consider snooping on telephone calls? Probably the same people that spend their weekends playing video games and bitching about no jobs.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SanDiego, People's Republic of California FEMA District 9
    Posts
    28,222

    Default

    Sometime back I had read a description of how to decrypt GSM.

    This reads like a classic "man in the middle" attack method.
    /sue hasn't had her first cup of coffees yet. ......

    This reads the same as the method I heard about several months ago.


    The least secure item in your home is your powered up cell phone. It can be turned off and still accessed from the network. It can be turned on and used to eavesdrop on your goings on.

    The Old Western Electric phones were more secure. When the receiver was placed on the hook audio to the line was disconnected by a physical switch. The only way to eavesdrop was to gain access to the phone and install a listening device. They are often prone to RFI.

    I have told the story about my Ex and the corner Dope dealer before.
    73,
    Sue
    A
    F6LJ

    Conspiracy Theorists Are People
    Who Question The Statements Made By Known Liars.



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Apache Junction
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AF6LJ View Post
    Sometime back I had read a description of how to decrypt GSM.

    This reads like a classic "man in the middle" attack method.
    /sue hasn't had her first cup of coffees yet. ......

    This reads the same as the method I heard about several months ago.


    The least secure item in your home is your powered up cell phone. It can be turned off and still accessed from the network. It can be turned on and used to eavesdrop on your goings on.

    The Old Western Electric phones were more secure. When the receiver was placed on the hook audio to the line was disconnected by a physical switch. The only way to eavesdrop was to gain access to the phone and install a listening device. They are often prone to RFI.

    I have told the story about my Ex and the corner Dope dealer before.
    Well if you are worried that someone is accessing your cell phone even if it's off....then simply pull the battery out. It might still have residual charge in it but thats about it.
    May the dragon of life only roast your hot-dogs and never burn your buns!

    Education is what you get from reading the small print. Experience is what you get from not reading it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Richland, WA
    Posts
    615

    Default

    Back in the 1990s (when cordless phones were operating in the 49 MHz range along with the baby monitors...) I used to have a bank of channels programmed into a Radioscrap scanner to peruse the bandwidth. I did happen to overhear a conversation between neighbors that concerned my family & proceded to confront one of them about it. This neighbor then contacted the other about our discussion...then this neighbor then have the audacity to call the phone company and have them check the terminal box for "illegal wiretaps" since "my neighbor" was "listening" in on my phone calls. Funny thing about this exchange was that the phone co. rep who came that morning was a good friend of mine and told her that there was no way he (me) could have 1) wiretapped your phone, and 2) if using a cordless phone there was no privacy (anyone could listen in.)

    Strange: after that moment all I could receive on that scanner were neighborhood baby monitors. What fun was that?
    "HEY!!! - These floors are dirty as hell and I'm NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANY MORE!!!!"
    Stanley Spadowski
    Custodial Lead
    U-62

    1977-2012: Celebrating 35 years in ham radio.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    harms way
    Posts
    8,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K5XIT View Post
    Who has so little to do that they would even consider snooping on telephone calls? Probably the same people that spend their weekends playing video games and bitching about no jobs.
    your government
    now with true viterbi decoder!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Wantage, NJ, USA FN21qf
    Posts
    18,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AF6LJ View Post
    Sometime back I had read a description of how to decrypt GSM.

    This reads like a classic "man in the middle" attack method.
    /sue hasn't had her first cup of coffees yet. ......
    Yeah kinda.

    The more stupid thing is that wireless operators reuse keys and expect their encryption to be secure.

    Oh, and by the way the encryption on your SIM card is bette than that of your actual communications. Proof that wireless companies care more about profits than you the customer.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •