Callsign
ad: dxeng
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Tuning Multi-Band Dipole

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-innov
ad: l-WarrenG
ad: l-rl
ad: l-tentec
ad: l-gcopper
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    City Island, Bronx, New York
    Posts
    78

    Default Tuning Multi-Band Dipole

    Building a 10-15-20 "catwisker" type dipole. What element sould I tune first??? I don't want this to turn into an exercise in Frustration !!! As we all know this can turn into fast. Thanks to all that reply...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    3763 Lyle Avenue, North Pole, AK 99705
    Posts
    22,631

    Default

    You always start from the inner elements and work out, whether it's a trap dipole or trap vertical. (Highest frequency band and work down). Generally this goes very quickly.

    Eric
    "The more you know, the less you don't know."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    9812 Banway Drive, Greenwell Springs, LA.
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N4MTB View Post
    Building a 10-15-20 "catwisker" type dipole. What element sould I tune first??? I don't want this to turn into an exercise in Frustration !!! As we all know this can turn into fast. Thanks to all that reply...

    Another name for these type of antennas is "Fan dipole" or parallel dipole. I've never heard catwisker but thats very discriptive.

    It is best to tune the LOWEST band first, or LONGEST WAVELENGTH. This is only logical if you think about it. The longer the wavelength, the less precise you have to be with antenna length. Let me explain.

    Lets take 80 meters for example. One half wave on 80 meters is approximately 132 feet. A basic dipole is a 1/2 wavelength antenna. 1/2 wave on 75 meters is approximately 123 feet. This means **the difference** between THE ends of the 75/80 phone and CW band is about 9 feet of wire.

    I'm not using math with engineering level accuracy here, but stay with me.

    On 20 meters a 1/2 wavelength is approximately 33 feet. Now, what we call the "20 meter" band is actually nestled between 20 and 21 meters. THE ENTIRE BANDWIDTH of that band is only a portion of ONE METERS WORTH of bandwidth, whereas the 75/80 meter band has 5 meters worth of bandwidth.

    The difference between the ends of the band on 20 meters would ONLY BE ABOUT THREE FEET of wire.

    As the frequency goes up, the less wire that it takes to make a significant change in an antenna.

    If we got down to the 50 Mhz band, we might be talking about less than ONE FOOT worth of wire to seriously change the resonant point on an antenna.

    THEREFORE, to answer your question with logic and simple math, it is best to tune your lowest frequency, longest wavelength elements first and work your way upn in frequency to tune the next. This is because the shorter elements are more difficult to tune and the effects of coupling to the other wires are more pronounced. Therefore, cutting a couple of inches off of your 10 meter wires will have very little effect on the 15 and 20 meter elements, whereas cutting the 20 meter element, if done LAST, might have a serious effect on the 10 meter and possibly 15 meter elements.

    Tune lowest band first.
    73, Heath/KE5FRF
    CWOps#776/SKCC#1940/NAQCC#1712/WAS#52445
    EchoLink Node#268023
    W5YI-VE
    My favorite mode? Morse, of course.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    9812 Banway Drive, Greenwell Springs, LA.
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KL7AJ View Post
    You always start from the inner elements and work out, whether it's a trap dipole or trap vertical. (Highest frequency band and work down). Generally this goes very quickly.

    Eric
    Eric, to avoid confusion, I do not believe he is referring to a trap dipole...By "cat whisker" I am thinking he means a fan dipole (if my visual of what cat whiskers look like is correct).

    If this is what he means, then I believe the very opposite advice would be true and he should start out with his low band wires first.
    73, Heath/KE5FRF
    CWOps#776/SKCC#1940/NAQCC#1712/WAS#52445
    EchoLink Node#268023
    W5YI-VE
    My favorite mode? Morse, of course.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    City Island, Bronx, New York
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Sorry for the poor terminology , but I am refering to a fan dipole. Specifically for 10-15-20 meter phone.

  6. #6

    Default

    I've always trimmed the higher-frequency elements first, then worked out. Always a "tuned once, and worked". I've never had to double-back on other elements. I've only built like 3 of them, so YMMV.
    Corey, KC2UGV

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Vero Beach, FL
    Posts
    308

    Default

    I've built a number of them and always tuner the lower frequency (longer) elements first. In my experience, the lower frequency elements affect the tuning of the higher frequency elements more than vice versa.

  8. #8

    Default

    Yes, trim the lowest frequency dipole first; then move up in frequency etc.

    The potentially larger dimensional changes on the longer dipoles have more effect on the shorter dipoles than vice-versa; so you want to do the longer dipoles first. You can still expect a few iterations.

    Eric's advice is fine for trapped antennas, but not for a fan dipole.

    Steve G3TXQ

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisiana Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,020

    Default

    Yes, trim the lower frequency pair first.

    Also, the wider the elements are separated, the less interaction.

  10. #10

    Default

    I'm in the longest to shortest camp myself, but I found that with 6" wire spacing I needed several trips up and down with the last tri-bander [also a 10/15/20 meter]. But once tuned, they are great antennas. I love the coaxial cable savings!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •