Callsign
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Which is better, a FT 1000 mp or FT 2000 ???

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-tentec
ad: l-rl
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-Heil
ad: l-innov
ad: l-WarrenG
ad: l-gcopper

Contribute
to QRZ

  1. #1

    Default Which is better, a FT 1000 mp or FT 2000 ???

    I want to have a good transceiver, the most important for me is signal handling, high sensitivity and low background noise, Does any one of you have ever tried this two radios... side by side ????

    thanks...................XE1ZLG Luis Gtz.

  2. #2

    Default And..............

    Also want to know which one has the quieter receiver ?

    thanks.......Luis Gtz 73

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Middle Georgia USA
    Posts
    7,722

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XE1ZLG View Post
    I want to have a good transceiver, the most important for me is signal handling, high sensitivity and low background noise, Does any one of you have ever tried this two radios... side by side ????

    thanks...................XE1ZLG Luis Gtz.
    We have owned and used the FT1000MP and FT2000 radios here in contests. Other than age there is not much difference between the radios, and you would never hear the difference in noise.

    The FT1000MP has bad transmitting keyclicks on CW but otherwise is a nice radio. I prefer the FT1000D or FT1000MP MKV version (which also has bad keyclicks on CW), but the FT1000MP is still better for copying very weak signals in my opinion than the FT2000.

    73 Tom

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •