What I find utterly amazing is the "moderator" personally attacking (at length) a poster for personally attacking another poster, then going one step further by attempting to defame his character, introducing "fuzzy discredit" & implying he has email "proof" against the poster's honesty! All this while claiming personal attacks will not be tolerated? Attacks by who? Double standard?
Is it just me that finds that definitively hypocritical?
If you got verifiable "proof", not this "absolute knowledge" trivia, post it so we can get both sides. Otherwise, it is just someone else's opinion & it shouldn't even be mentioned in a public forum unless you are willing to air both sides. Dangling hearsay over someone's head is unfair & just plain dirty pool! If you are a responsible moderator, you lead by example, not by censorship & innuendo. Taking cheap shots shows you are really no better than those you choose to scorn or "moderate".
Afterall, fair is fair as Momma used to say...
Not 'R', not 'X', not even 'PG' but 'G' so what say you?