Callsign
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Article on CFL vs Incandescent

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-innov
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-ezhang

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Park Hills,MO
    Posts
    2,868

    Default Article on CFL vs Incandescent

    http://sound.westhost.com/articles/incandescent.htm

    There are many variables to consider. After reading this, a ban on incandescents makes no sense.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mt. Pleasant, NC (near Charlotte)
    Posts
    9,806

    Default

    Their server won't load the page right now. But it really doesn't matter. OLED lamps will replace incandescent, CFL, and the current cheesy illumination LED (appear to be white, but are missing major bands of color) bulbs.

    With OLED's bright, full-spectrum, super-efficient lighting, the relative merits of interim technologies are moot.
    Last edited by WA4BRL; 09-29-2009 at 03:35 AM.
    -----------
    73, Steve
    -----------
    41 years in Amateur Radio

  3. #3

    Default

    What temperature in K do the OLEDs produce. I've always felt that incandescent bulbs produced a depressing light. 6500K is about right for my eyes.
    The Voice Of Seasoning

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Beautiful Downtown Colorado. (Montrose, SW corner)
    Posts
    24,847

    Default

    I didn't read the whole article, but I think a common mistake in comparisons and touted advantages is the assumption that the incandescent lamp that is being replace is used a LOT.

    If, as I do, you only use the tungsten lamp briefly and occasionally, many of the benefits of the later lamp types becomes unimportant.

    TOM K8ERV Montrose Colo

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    nr Bristol, TN
    Posts
    7,720

    Default

    Interesting article, especially regarding Power Factor problems.

    The article does confirm repeatedly just how stupid and/or dishonest politicians and bureaucrats are. But we already knew that!
    “There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.”
    John Adams

    "The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."
    Plato


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mt. Pleasant, NC (near Charlotte)
    Posts
    9,806

    Default

    I tried again and got the article to load. Very well researched and well written. It's the best single source of good information I've seen on the subject.

    The author does not address how LED lighting scores on the Color Rendering Index. But then, his article is a comparison of CFL's to Incandescent bulbs. What he does write about LED's is factual, so I'll not fault him for that.

    LED lighting CAN be manufactured to be full-spectrum white light which provides perfect color rendering. Trouble is, that is still more costly to manufacture. Most common "white" LEDs convert blue light to an (approximate) white light spectrum using photoluminescence. The resulting light looks similar to white but, as with common flourescent lamps, lacks certain bands of color, resulting in poor color rendition.

    Organic LED panels promise high output full-spectrum, white light at reasonable manufacturing cost. The first commercially available OLED lights were offered in May of this year. Philips Lighting opened up a webshop upon which OLED lighting samples under the brand name 'Lumiblade' can be ordered online.

    The future is bright!
    Last edited by WA4BRL; 09-29-2009 at 02:49 PM.
    -----------
    73, Steve
    -----------
    41 years in Amateur Radio

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Beautiful Downtown Colorado. (Montrose, SW corner)
    Posts
    24,847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by W4HAY View Post
    The article does confirm repeatedly just how stupid and/or dishonest politicians and bureaucrats are. But we already knew that!
    You are being too kind.

    TOM K8ERV Montrose Colo

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    7,873

    Default

    Just read the part about using CFL's in sealed enclosures, and how that's a bad thing because the electronics can go above 50 deg. C quickly, and the article says that's when CFL's fail prematurely.

    I've got on in a "sealed" ceiling enclousure, and it's been there "pretty long"...maybe a year or so and it's still going strong. I use CFL's in the ceiling fixtures because I've got 11-12' ceilings, and the ladder is five flights down in the basement. Is there anyone else using CFL's like this, and does your experience match what's reported in the article? I'm only into the first year of intermittant use...when it's on it's on for an hour or less. According to the article I'm running that CFL above its specified temperature. What I don't know is how long it's going to last like that...but so far, anyway, it's just fine.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •