Callsign
ad: tentec
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: 27.205 Mhz and 462.5 Mhz perfect odd (17x) multiples

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-WarrenG
ad: l-rl
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-tentec
ad: l-innov
  1. #1

    Default 27.205 Mhz and 462.5 Mhz perfect odd (17x) multiples

    I have a cophase harness that I made back in my CB days. Since 27.205 Mhz is the middle of the 27 Mhz CB, I guess that is what I had it cut for. I just noticed that both the shared FRS/GMRS and some GMRS channels are almost exactly 17 times the frequency of 27.205 Mhz. That means that a 1/4WL phasing line on 27.205 Mhz is still good (usable) for 462.5 Mhz as a 17/4 WL phasing line and probably even all of the GMRS & FRS freqs even as high as 467.7 Mhz. That is really convenient for me because I still use both of those bands and like some directivity. I find that very convenient and just wanted to share that info in case anyone else in interested in playing around with cophasing both bands like me.

    I can get the optimal spacing (2/3WL) for the UHF setup but unfortunately for HF (27 Mhz), I can only get about 1/4 WL spacing on my vehicle although I still get the larger aperture and spacial diversity plus the -3dB quieting off the sides.

    Perhaps I should use a "90-90" setup for 27 Mhz using a delay line on the leading antenna for that nice wide cardioid azimuthal shape (similar to a 3 element Yagi-Uda beam) with 3dB additional gain in the favored direction.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Orland Park Illinois
    Posts
    1,288

    Default

    Better yet just make an antenna for 10m. If you are a tech.

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...htm?list991146
    [B]In the beginning the Universe was created. [B]This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams[/B][/B]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Southern Wisconsin, EN52
    Posts
    6,207

    Default

    Just THINK of what you can do with phasing lines made of 1.5" hardline for 160 meters......

    (ouch)
    "Clear intent is the best predictor of experience"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    21,474

    Default

    Pushraft, the reason your idea is not practical is because of the losses you would incur due to the excessive length of the cable. You said it yourself, when you quoted "17/4 WL". Have you checked out the transmission line losses for that cable, as expressed in "dB loss per 100 feet of cable", which is a specification given for just about every reputable brand and type of cable.

    Why would you want to gain a couple of dB through a phased array, if the hardware used to create that array would have so much more of a loss ?

    Have you gotten your license, and actually gotten on the air, as so many of us have recommended you do ?

    73, Jim

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Kilowatt Alley
    Posts
    9,938

    Default

    your idea is not practical
    "Not practical" is his other moniker.

  6. #6

    Default

    Hi,
    the 75 ohm cable is Belden 8241 (0.66 Vf) which is RG-59/U which is 7.6dB per 100 ft loss @ 462.6 Mhz and I am using only 6 feet per leg (to each mag mount) so that is only about 1/2 dB loss per leg of the cophase harness (including the connectors). That is minor compared to the 2.5dB gain, larger aperture, and spacial diversity I am getting as well as better performance. I have only tested the UHF recently but now I am motivated to test the CB as well which should perform even better because the losses are much less on HF than on UHF. Note than 2dB (or sometimes even 1dB) can make or break intelligibility in a very weak signal. I am not talking about 20dB fading DX signals here I am talking point to point weak signal UHF.

    Also I am using all PL-259 connectors so there goes the theory that UHF connectors (PL-259 and SO-239) cannot be used for cophasing UHF freqs. Sure they work better at HF but my goal here is convenience. To switch from UHF to HF cophasing (and vice versa), I just do a few simple tasks and I got it in a few minutes. I carry the antennas with me and just switch them when I need to. I think it is fun because an omni antenna while I am parked is a waste because too much signal is going in the wrong directions.

    Now as far as the license, there is no need to pressure me and try to rush me. I have been reading my 3 antenna books (ARRL antenna book 18th edition, ARRL Vertical antenna classics (compiled by KU7G), and my Radio Shack (rat shack?) antenna book. I have also been listening in on 20 meters the past few mornings and practiced writing down callsigns which they usually say fast and with my crappy antenna (I am working on a better one), it is a challenge to get the callsign correct. I have also taken 7 or 8 practice tests for Technician class and passed all but 1 of them the first time.

    Just be patient with me I am only in my 40s so there is plenty of time for me to enjoy the hobby. I will be working on an attic antenna soon and am contemplating an outdoor 80m antenna too so stay "tuned" for an update.

  7. #7

    Default

    Removed May 07, 2009
    Last edited by KJ4AUR; 05-07-2009 at 04:31 PM.

  8. #8

    Default

    I guess by co-phasing, you mean the unequal y-leg cable model? (For the "cyclical polarization") or am I mistaken on this one?

    I guess Pushraft has one way of getting in the hobby, lurking the ham community, then tip-toeing in, rather than me who is rushing head-long into it :P and damned if I screw up.

    Just hope I don't get a FCC visit in the first year

    ---

    Knock Knock.
    Me: Hello?
    Guy:Yes, i'm with the FCC.
    Me: K.
    Guy: Here ya go. Payable by end of the month.
    Me: OH SHI-!

  9. #9

    Default So What?

    Just the same way the compartive mass of a neutron is almost exactly 6xpi to the fifth power one electron mass.

    Zoop de Doop!

    So what?

    G4ALA
    Licensed Since 1970

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Kilowatt Alley
    Posts
    9,938

    Default

    I guess Pushraft has one way of getting in the hobby, lurking the ham community, then tip-toeing in, rather than me who is rushing head-long into it :P and damned if I screw up.
    It's always safer to just push the raft around in shallow water than hop on it and head downstream in a real adventure.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •