Callsign
ad: dxeng
Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 114

Thread: Hurricane Watch Net Activated For Gustav

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-innov
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-ezhang
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    DM42kj
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Hmmmmm....
    Is Crypt Boy becoming the next Link-Bot????

    Or is Crypt Boy not exercising his brain by not making contacts??
    When will the price of fuel go back down to 30¢ a gallon??????

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    DM42kj
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kb3laz View Post
    I hope its not asking me to spare it, lol.
    No... but you're dreaming of talking chihuahuas, Travis....

    "DROP THE CHALUPA!"
    When will the price of fuel go back down to 30¢ a gallon??????

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    6,927

    Default All Reports are in...

    We have reviewed all the reports that have come out of the Louisiana region and Hurricane Gustav behavior.

    Conclusion:

    It was rainy and windy as suspected and there were lots of reporters waiting and watching for death and destruction which, didn't happen.

    There you have it folks, put it in the books.

    K2WH
    Doing, Working, Repairing and Building Radio Since 1969.......

    WA2AEH (1969)

    K2WH (2000)

    VP2V/K2WH B.V.I (Vacapedition 2013)



    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Icomportablerigs/
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HallicraftersRadios/

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Seriously, I don't get it. Yesterday (Monday) afternoon, as the storm peaked over Louisanna I tuned in to the net. I heard Net Control asking (begging) for reports from stations in the "affected area" presumably to pass along to the NHC.
    There was no communications outage as far as I know. Phone lines were up. The internet was up. Is the NHC actually counting on such random, sporadic data from unreliable sources to make any kind of meaningful hurricane analysis? Gee, if such data was of value the NCS could have chosen random phone numbers from the white pages in Baton Rouge, or Lafayette and CALLED the people on the phone and asked them what the weather condx were!! In a matter of seconds I checked www.wunderground.com and had literally dozens of up-to-the-minute accurate data points from automated weather stations, showing me wind speed, temperatures, all on one map. Was the ham data, from eyewitnesses in the "affected area" of more value than this?
    I just don't get it. The folks at NHC CAN'T be taking ham radio seriously, can they? Yes, I know, under different circumstances (total loss of power, all communications facilities down), the situation could be different. I am talking about what happened during my observation yesterday.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    5,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by k2xt View Post
    The folks at NHC CAN'T be taking ham radio seriously, can they?
    I think all the official agencies are taking it less and less seriously everyday, and the "wacker" phenomenon is in most part the reason why.
    I believe every problem has a solution.
    Hence, if there's no solution, there's no problem.

    ----------------------------------------------

    God is our creation, not our creator.

    73 de HI8/VE2NSM

    Montréal, FN35gm

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    6,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by k2xt View Post
    Seriously, I don't get it. Yesterday (Monday) afternoon, as the storm peaked over Louisanna I tuned in to the net. I heard Net Control asking (begging) for reports from stations in the "affected area" presumably to pass along to the NHC.
    There was no communications outage as far as I know. Phone lines were up. The internet was up. Is the NHC actually counting on such random, sporadic data from unreliable sources to make any kind of meaningful hurricane analysis? Gee, if such data was of value the NCS could have chosen random phone numbers from the white pages in Baton Rouge, or Lafayette and CALLED the people on the phone and asked them what the weather condx were!! In a matter of seconds I checked www.wunderground.com and had literally dozens of up-to-the-minute accurate data points from automated weather stations, showing me wind speed, temperatures, all on one map. Was the ham data, from eyewitnesses in the "affected area" of more value than this?
    I just don't get it. The folks at NHC CAN'T be taking ham radio seriously, can they? Yes, I know, under different circumstances (total loss of power, all communications facilities down), the situation could be different. I am talking about what happened during my observation yesterday.
    I agree with you. Just dead air coming out of the "Affected Area". But then again, all one had to do was watch the weather channel, CNN, Fox or just about any of the major networks and get first hand reports on the ground from their people in the middle of the storm, especially Heraldo who thought Al Capone might show up.

    As technology advances with the appropriate sensors on the ground, the Hurricane Watch Net will pass into history.

    K2WH
    Doing, Working, Repairing and Building Radio Since 1969.......

    WA2AEH (1969)

    K2WH (2000)

    VP2V/K2WH B.V.I (Vacapedition 2013)



    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Icomportablerigs/
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HallicraftersRadios/

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    12,768

    Default

    The VOIP net was active till 3am Tuesday morning.

    I didn't hear squat last night on 14.325.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    6,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kg4kww View Post
    The VOIP net was active till 3am Tuesday morning.

    I didn't hear squat last night on 14.325.
    Maybe cause there was nothing to report except its rainy, windy and there are little puddles on the ground.

    Seriously though, don't you think there is better data coming out of the Affected Area from the weather channel guys and their handheld wind speed devices? That plus satellite imagery, doppler radar etc.
    Last edited by K2WH; 09-03-2008 at 12:52 AM.
    Doing, Working, Repairing and Building Radio Since 1969.......

    WA2AEH (1969)

    K2WH (2000)

    VP2V/K2WH B.V.I (Vacapedition 2013)



    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Icomportablerigs/
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HallicraftersRadios/

  9. #99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kg4kww View Post
    The VOIP net was active till 3am Tuesday morning.

    I didn't hear squat last night on 14.325.
    The VOIP net had constant problems throughout with their audio links dropping out. I suppose if you want to play whacker using the little IM box on EchoLink then things were good to go.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    12,768

    Default

    k2wh--Seriously though, don't you think there is better data coming out of the Affected Area from the weather channel guys and their handheld wind speed devices? That plus satellite imagery, doppler radar etc.
    Yep I agree but this gives these folks a sense of purpose and justifies the expense of all their gear to the OL.

Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •