Callsign
ad: dxeng
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Changing feedpoint location on elevated vertical

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-BCInc
ad: l-innov
ad: l-ezhang
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-Waters
  1. #1

    Default Changing feedpoint location on elevated vertical

    I am playing around with my Hy-Gain AV-18VS and have a question. By default, this antenna is set up so that the feed point is approximately 16 inches from the bottom of the main vertical element. I would like to remount this vertical in an elevated configuration about 6 feet off the ground, and as such I was wondering if there was any reason I couldn't take the coil and matching assembly and affix it to the bottom of the driven element. This has the effect of moving the coil 18 inches lower, making the taps easier to reach without dragging a stepladder or stool outside every time I change bands.

    Any thoughts? Would there be a specific reason they fed it so far from the bottom, or just construction constraints?
    KC4YLV
    EM26wc

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kc4ylv View Post
    This has the effect of moving the coil 18 inches lower, making the taps easier to reach without dragging a stepladder or stool outside every time I change bands.
    By whatever percentage of a wavelength is 18 inches, that's how much the impedance will change. Hint: Don't do it for 2m where 18 inches is 1/5 of a wavelength. Seriously, you will have to re-tune your antenna for every band where the frequency shift is unacceptable.
    73, Cecil, www.w5dxp.com
    Random length "tuned feeders" usually de-tune an antenna system (thus requiring a tuner).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    2,956

    Default

    Cecil has it correct as usual. Changing the feed point of the AV-18VS will affect EVERY band and while it is possible, it is just not worth the bother to readjust the antenna for each band. You probably want to enjoy the antenna, not redesign it.

    Consider using several relays or a single stepper relay to change the tap on the coil at the base of the antenna. Use short leads. Isolate the DC control feed for the relay coil with about five or six turns through a ferrite bead close to the relay and then control the band changes from your shack.

    Also look into mounting the base of the antenna (and radials) high enough so that people can walk under the radials without bumping them. The radials can inflict an RF burn if touched, so if you have family members that might tough low hanging wires, raise them out of reach.

    73,
    Terry, K7FE
    Terry Graves, K7FE
    Chief Editor, QRZ.COM

    "Some people call CW a MODE but in
    reality it is an autonomous LANGUAGE."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barberton, Ohio
    Posts
    11,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K7FE View Post
    Cecil has it correct as usual. Changing the feed point of the AV-18VS will affect EVERY band and while it is possible, it is just not worth the bother to readjust the antenna for each band. You probably want to enjoy the antenna, not redesign it.

    Consider using several relays or a single stepper relay to change the tap on the coil at the base of the antenna. Use short leads. Isolate the DC control feed for the relay coil with about five or six turns through a ferrite bead close to the relay and then control the band changes from your shack.

    Also look into mounting the base of the antenna (and radials) high enough so that people can walk under the radials without bumping them. The radials can inflict an RF burn if touched, so if you have family members that might tough low hanging wires, raise them out of reach.

    73,
    Terry, K7FE

    Could not one utilize a motorized roller inductor / shorting arrangement (such as used in Collins single-wire tuners, for example) to accomplish this remotely?
    The AR15/M16 - Irritating practically everyone since 1960...

  5. #5

    Default

    Good notes all around. Here are my thoughts. A little background on this antenna - it is just 18 feet of aluminum pipe and a B&W coil, center conductor to a tap on the coil, shield to the earth/radial system. So, there are no traps or other considerations. Currently it is roughly tuned to resonate on 20, I get a decent match bottoming out in the 1.2 -1.3 range about 14.150.

    Pretty much what I am thinking right now is that I want to dedicate it for 20 and 30 meter usage, which could be facilitated with a single relay and one small coil, rather than the big and corroded coil on there currently. It tunes up nicely on 20m, with good performance, and the coil allows me to travel down to 30. Do you think that at my power levels (barefoot absolute max, more likely 25-50w max, I will never own an amp) I could get away with a standard sized relay to switch the coil in? I'd hate to have to shelf the project because I can't afford a $60 coax relay for an HF antenna - I already have two satellite antennas begging for coax relays, and quite frankly, they get fed first.
    Last edited by KC4YLV; 08-04-2008 at 06:43 PM.
    KC4YLV
    EM26wc

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    12,373

    Default

    It should work just fine as a base loaded vertical. The tap points for resonance will probably be different but the performance may be much better by getting it up higher and operating as a ground plane.

    A standard relay should also work fine for 100 watt power level. They used such relays in tranceivers for years.

    I say go for it....
    Last edited by KA4DPO; 08-04-2008 at 07:11 PM.
    i'm sorry you don't have the experience or understanding to realize that others possess a skill set that you seem to dismiss as fantastical.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Shropshire. England.
    Posts
    14,808

    Default

    I would suggest you just leave it as it is. Otherwise you are not going to have fun !!!

    G0GQK

  8. #8

    Default

    Well, that's the problem - "as is" means ground mounted with 16 wire radials. Quite honestly I cannot afford the copper for a 64+ radial system which is what I want. I would much rather build an elevated feed vertical and use a dozen radials split between two bands for better performance

    That being said, I'm going to just go for it and sink some fence rail, run radials and move the feedpoint down a foot, see where that gets me.
    KC4YLV
    EM26wc

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    2,956

    Default

    Everyone admires an experimenter.

    Please let us know your results.

    I did like one of the suggestions about the motor driven coil by N8YX.

    73,
    Terry, K7FE
    Terry Graves, K7FE
    Chief Editor, QRZ.COM

    "Some people call CW a MODE but in
    reality it is an autonomous LANGUAGE."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    12,373

    Default

    I think you would be pleased with the result if you mount it as a ground plane and move the loading coil down. That is a time proven configuration and I'll bet you a case of beer it will work better on 20 as an elevated ground plane than a ground mounted vertical.......

    John.
    i'm sorry you don't have the experience or understanding to realize that others possess a skill set that you seem to dismiss as fantastical.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •