Callsign
ad: CommRadio-1
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53

Thread: New Yaesu

ad: l-AmericanRadio
ad: l-assoc
ad: l-ezhang
ad: l-Waters
ad: l-gcopper
ad: l-hrd-1
ad: l-innov
ad: l-BCInc
  1. #31

    Default

    You cannot have MY FT-847, I'm just learning how to use it all.

    OK, it's not perfect, but it is a decent rig if you want a desk radio and can have only one.

    I'm sorry they discontinued it - fortunately, I got all the accessories I needed before they discontinued everything.
    You pays your money and takes your chances: The contents of this posting are personal opinions. Persons trying to find motive, plot, logic, truth or beauty will be punshed severely under law.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Findlay, OH
    Posts
    310

    Default

    It looks like a radio you can tak out to the field and not have to worry about wrecking it. Thats just my opinion...
    Jason is tired of all the political correctness!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Grid Square JN39ul/Kaiserslautern-Siegelbach, Germany
    Posts
    2,273

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (KE7DLG @ Mar. 26 2007,03:10)]
    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (AB3BK @ Mar. 25 2007,12:07)]Another pic...looks "cheap"
    Yes it does and in the same price range as Kenwood's TS-480 which looks like and is a good little radio. Too bad, I would love to have a reason to go back to Yaesu but they just aren't cooperating.
    You sir have taken the words right out of my mouth. I would love to go back to Yaesu, but ICOM hasn't disappointed me lately.
    WVM
    Kilo Zero West Virginia Mountaineer

    Chad E. Eagle
    Kaiserslautern-Siegelbach, Germany

    Montani Semper Liberi - "Mountaineers are Always Free"
    June 20, 1863
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Virginia

    That is all!

  4. #34

    Default

    They are for sale now, AES had them at the their Superfest today for $999.00
    The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, seems like an awful waste of space.


  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lancaster County, PA - FM19vv
    Posts
    3,406

    Default

    Ugly, both of them. Especially that dual-bander. These design engineers need to lay off the pipe.

    $1K for a 160-6 radio? No thanks.
    73
    Steve
    N3ATS

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Wantage, NJ, USA FN21qf
    Posts
    18,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (Kc5fog @ Mar. 26 2007,16:28)]
    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (AC0H @ Mar. 25 2007,11:20)]
    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (AB3BK @ Mar. 25 2007,20:54)]Kenwood is the only one making a do-it-all rig for the shack with the 2000. We need more options. You would think that with all the sales of the ts-2000, Yaesu and Icom would do something.

    Dave
    This is exactly what Ham Radio doesn't need, more DC to Daylight rigs with at best crappy performance, like the TS-2000. What happens when your DC to daylight rig quits working and it's the only rig you've got because it's "cool" to cover 160m-70cm in one box?
    I totally agree, I've never understood the obsession with DC to daylight radios or wanting a those ultra small HTs. I guess allot of people don’t realize what its costing them in terms of receiver quality or in the HTs case overall build quality.

    DC to daylight is ok in the mobile but most people don’t realize they can come out cheaper if they just buy a HF rig and then a dual band mobile for a base setup and end up with 2 better quality radios.

    FOG
    I don't know about you, but my Icom 7000's receiver is far better in performance than many HF only radios I've used.

    All modes on VHF/UHF without buying an expensive satellite radio is a plus.

    I love my ProIII but I wouldn't mind using the 7k as my main home rig either.




  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Middle TN, 50 mi NW of Nashville
    Posts
    7,271

    Default

    I couldn't name from memory the model number of a single Icom, Yaesu or Kenwood on the market to-day, if my life depended on it. But I have a catalogue from a major equipment dealer here in front of me (they sent it to me because I mail-ordered $30 worth of antenna hardware from them a few months ago), and I see they have an Icom IC-7800 listed for $10,599.99.

    I think I'll go out right away and buy two of them.
    "Invention is the mother of necessity."

    This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
    http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
    http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

  8. #38

    Default

    There's a better picture on RigPix:

    Clicky

    73, Rob

  9. #39
    W0BKR Guest

    Default

    Kinda ugly aint it?

    Give me a good HF IF and some transverters....




  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Southern Wisconsin, EN52
    Posts
    6,194

    Default

    Not just ugly.
    Fugly describes it best.

    I got to say, I own a LOT of Yaesu radios.

    Three FT1000Ds (Two were bought new, one in 1991, one in 2000, one slightly used one in 98.
    Also, have two FT-ONEs,(older top of the line rigs from early 80s)


    Of their DC to daylight rigs, I have the FT897, FT847, FT100D (in the car), and the FT817 (QRP).

    All of these rigs have the proper filters for CW installed, and with these filters, they just are not all that bad.
    They SEEM to work well, I don't have any problems with them, and they certainly outperform my boat anchors.

    They may not be up to standards of top end HF only rigs built today, but they are not junk.

    And on VHF and UHF, I can state for a fact they perform at LEAST as well as my high end gear from 15 years ago.
    I have an IC821 (That was Icoms top of the line rig in the early 90s), and I also have the TS790A, that was the Kenwood top VHF/UHF rig from 15 years ago.

    Each of these rigs would have set you back over $2000.00 bucks with accesories at that time.

    These older VHF/UHF only rigs do NOT outperform any of the newer Yaesu rigs, in ANY respect. (ok ONE exception is overload to strong out of band signals)
    The 821 covers ONLY the ham bands, and not wide coverage, and IS less prone to overload from Commercial signals.
    The Yaesu rigs are slightly prone to this, as ANY wide receiver would be, when I use them with better antennas.



    "Clear intent is the best predictor of experience"

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •