RG-8x and RG-8u

Discussion in 'General Technical Questions and Answers' started by N6DCN, Sep 5, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. N6DCN

    N6DCN Ham Member

    What it the difference and benefits of one vs the other.
     
  2. WB2WIK

    WB2WIK Premium Subscriber

    RG8X is "mini-8." It's commercial-hobbyist cable with no mil spec to guide it, so it varies a lot in construction and quality. But it's supposed to be .242" diameter with a #16 AWG stranded center conductor and a "foam" dielectric. It's usually very flexible.

    RG8/U is a very old military specification for 52 Ohm coax. It's .405" in diameter with a #13 AWG center conductor and a solid polyethylene dielectric. As a "mil spec" product, it was discontinued 20 years ago; however as a "commercial" product, anybody can make and sell it and it doesn't have to meet any particular specification. RG8/U was replaced by RG213/U decades ago. There isn't a lot of difference, except RG213/U always has a stranded #13 AWG center conductor, at least 95% outer conductor (braid) coverage, and a Type IIA outer jacket material which is more UV-radiation tolerant than the old RG8/U product which was Type I and could degrade with exposure to the sun.

    The "larger diameter" cable (RG8/U types) can handle more power and have somewhat less loss than RG8X.

    WB2WIK/6
     
  3. N6DCN

    N6DCN Ham Member

    Alright so the RG213/U is actually a better product with the stranded #13 center conductor.
    Thank you for your help. Great explanation.
     
  4. K2PJW

    K2PJW Subscriber

    Hi,
    I have rg-8x now but will change to rg-213 shortly. I wished I would have gone with 213 to begin with. I need a buriable coax and 8x will not last long buried. Steve is absolutely 100% correct with everything he said. I respect his opinion more than most. He knows!!! I highly respect his opinions. Good Luck!
     
  5. NA0AA

    NA0AA Ham Member

    Another note is that 8x is not very useful above 50 mHz due to losses.

    I like 8x for portable use, it's better for RF than RG-58 [but is a little bit thicker and heaver] but a great deal easier to handle than RG-213.

    8x is also useful for in-shack jumpers due to it's lighter weight and greater flexability.

    Sometimes it's hard to hold 213 up with a dipole - if it is a long run, you can use 8x to the ground then 213 the rest of the way if you want.

    Personally, I have used RG-8x for all my HF antennas, but I don't use an amp either - when I get an amp, I'm going to have to upgrade some or all of my coax.
     
  6. WA0LYK

    WA0LYK Ham Member

    I don't think classifying rg-8x as an inferior product as compared to rg213 is not exactly what 'WIK was trying to portray. First, there are good and bad products in both classes of cable. Second, as an engineer, I recognize that each type of cable may be more appropriate in given situations. For things like jumpers below 30 mHz and probably higher, a good brand of rg-8x is entirely appropriate. As pointed out, it is appropriate to use for hf dipoles if the center isn't supported.

    I guess my point is don't say rg-8x is inferior just recognize it has different design criteria and is more appropriate for certain applications.

    Jim
    WA0LYK
     
  7. WA9SVD

    WA9SVD Ham Member

    Unfortunately, many sources of RG-8X, RG-8-mini, etc. ARE inferior. Since there's no standard for such a cable, there's no level of quality that can be guaranteed. About the ONLY standard for RG-8x cable is the outside diameter; internal construction, braid coverage, outer insulation material is up to the individual MANUFACTURER, not even the dealer or distributer.

    On the other hand, RG-213/U cable is expected to be constructed to at LEAST the mil-spec as to insulation (solid polyethylene) conductor type and size, shield/braid coverage, and outer jacket material. It will also have to have the appropraite power handling capability.

    "RG-8 type" cables have a meaningless definition now. The "RG-8" mil-spec was dropped years ago, as WIK said. So now, any manufacturer can make a 'RG-8 type" cable with NO real semblance to the original RG-8/U spec, and no guarantee of quality.
    On the other hand, reputable manufacturers can and DO produce high quality "RG-8 type" cables, often of higher quality and lower loss than the original RG-8/U spec. Typical examples are Belden 9913, 9914, and 9913F, as well as original LMR-400 and the newer LMR-400 Ultra-flex and other variations.
     
  8. K8JD

    K8JD Ham Member

    I have runs of RG8x into the woods for HF loops and dipoles behind my house, as long as 250 ft, with no problems on 160-30 M bands.
    If I had a reason to put up antennas for higher bands with long runs I would use a better variety of coax.
    For my 10 M yagi and a few VHF/uhf antennas I use Belden 9913 coax, that is similar to RG213 but has a bit less loss on VHF/UHF bands. I only have about 50 ft runs of that line to the antennas.
     
  9. WA9SVD

    WA9SVD Ham Member

    At HF, good quality 8x from a reputable manufacturer is acceptable, if you realize the loss associated with a 250' run. THAT is pretty long, and personally, if I had a run that long, I'd use something a bit lower in loss than 8x, probably something like LMR-400. There's always a trade off of loss vs. cost for feedline. 9913 (despite complaints of some) if properly installed, is a good choice for the VHF and UHF antennas, unless hardline or HELIAX were economically available. With only a 50' run, it wouldn't show much improvement. It may be a luxury for only a 50' run at 10 Meters, but certainly doesn't hurt.
     
  10. K9KJM

    K9KJM Ham Member

    Correct coax feedline selection depends on a number of factors. Frequency of use? Length of coax run? Power level? Special conditions like direct burial?

    For HF use, Most any coax cable will function just fine. The "top" choice is Belden RG-213, Which can be run over with a truck, And will handle high power levels. But any RG-8 type, Or RG 8X, (Or even RG-6 CATV coax) can be used for 160 meters up through 10 meters ........

    VHF and UHF however are a very different story. For any length longer than 15 or so feet, Nothing but the best Times LMR-400 type coax will do.

    (A good cable to AVOID is Belden 9913. Belden has produced many "versions" of 9913, Several of which are just junk.) They claim that the latest version is now OK. It may very well be. After failures of THREE different versions, We gave up on 9913.

    LMR-400 is good for up to 75 or so feet of length at VHF/UHF for normal use, To go longer, Get some good used Andrew Heliax, Now available at most all swapfests for reasonable prices, Complete with connectors.
     
  11. K0RGR

    K0RGR Premium Subscriber

    There's 8X and there's 8X. I have acquired several hundred feet of 8X very cheap via the Internet, and I have not yet found what's wrong with it. I mainly use it for Field Day, and a 200 foot run of it worked great on the HF bands last June. It came with connectors on it, so I haven't seen if the braid coverage is decent or not yet.

    Now, RG-58 is something else, entirely. I regard most 58 as junk. Decent 8X at least has a stranded center conductor, making it more flexible.

    I use 8X in lots of places - mobile and portable installations, going around rotators on HF beams, and jumpers in the shack, though I've started to make more of those from double-shielded cables.

    When assembling your own connectors, be sure you have the correct adapters for RG-8X. It's not the same size as the one used for RG-58.
     
  12. WB2WIK

    WB2WIK Premium Subscriber

    ::The RG8X adapter is type UG-176, while the RG-58 adapter is type UG-175.

    There is very good RG58 cable available cheaply, with a stranded center conductor...it's very flexible, more so than RG8X, and very high quality.

    Here's one example: RG-58C/U made by Belden as P/N 9203. I have lots of it. It's flexible as wet spaghetti and has a higher DWV rating than RG8X...

    WB2WIK/6
     
  13. K9STH

    K9STH Ham Member

    There are different versions of RG58/U: The RG58A/U and RG58C/U have stranded center conductors and are MUCH more flexible than the solid center conductor versions.

    As for the reducers: If you remove the outer sheath of RG8/X then you can use the smaller reducer that is intended for use with RG58/U. The same thing for RG59/U cable. That is, if you remove the outer sheath you can use the smaller reducer. Now using the correct reducer is always right. But, you will not be able to tell the difference between using the smaller reducer with RG8/X or RG59/U coax and using the "proper" size reducer.

    Glen, K9STH
     
  14. KD8GFC

    KD8GFC Ham Member

    I think your question has basicly been answered I just thought I would throw in what happened over here . I had 80' of RG-8X on my 2m/440 antenna for about 2 weeks and then asking similer questions I decided to change it out for 80' of 9913-F7 coax and the difference was like night and day better recieve and much better transmit on VHF/UHF Im sure 8X would work ok for HF wirh runs under 100'. 73's Jim !!
     
  15. N6DCN

    N6DCN Ham Member

    Allot of real good stuff here Thank you all
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

ad: SOTA-1