Parasitic Suppresser

CAN WE STAY ON TOPIC PLEASE?

 

 Indeed Sue. Yahoo's ham_amps gets along okay without any control-freak censors.

 

 Your complaint should be with the miscreant who is forcing you to read this thread.

 

Nothing I want to get into here Rich and Im not referring to the stay on topic noise either.

 

Oh I don't know... Listening to these two old boys whinge about their (paranoid/irrelevant) issues with various internet forums over the years is riveting stuff.
It makes me feel better about life anyway. I feel almost like a sensible grown up adult... Give us more...

 

Guys, pardon me, carry on for the benefit of G0HZU, I know what it's like to not get enough of a good thing.

 

 Would you discuss it on the telephone Carl?

 

Which begs the question. Had you not made mention, then would it have happened?

 

What's kind of curious is that if you google their callsigns with the word 'banned' you can see this isn't the first time they have had this very same conversation where Carl gives Rich his proud speech about how he kiddie scripted past the security of their hated? forum to remove his ban.

The most recent appears to be last November. Why are they repeating the same old guff to each other?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ham_amplifiers/message/24322

 

 The ban-surge by JI on AMPS was a good thing since it led to the birth of ham_amps, a group with no censors/drinking buddies to protect self-declared amplifier experts from sound critiquing.
cheers