New FAA regulations require towers under 200′ to be marked

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by W0IW, Jul 13, 2019.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: L-MFJ
ad: Left-2
ad: K5AB-Elect-1
ad: Subscribe
ad: MessiPaoloni-1
ad: Left-3
  1. NK9G

    NK9G Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    About 15 or 20 years ago I received a letter from Milwaukee County (WI) that due to airport expansion that my 2 towers would have to come down. I have a Rohan HDBX-48’ with a VHF/UHF Antenna taking the the top/peak of the antenna to about 80’. The other tower is a EZ-Way 44’ crank up with mast coming out of the top with another VHF/UHF antenna bringing that to about 75’. (The installation is all heavy duty with no issues over past 30 years.)
    The proposed runway extension was not even over my home but the Engineer insisted. I appealed to the County Board in person with regional County Supervisor present. I explained that before any plane were to hit my towers they would be hitting the oak trees in my neighborhood. Is what the Engineer failed to identify ir mention was about 700’ South of me commercial high line towers exceeding 100’. The County Board rescinded tower removal order and the Engineer was questioned by board, “Is this how You do all Your work”? Case closed! The Chairman Of the Committee told me to go and enjoy my hobby. That was One Happy Day for me. Rick. NK 9G
     
    WK0DX, K3RLD, NL7W and 10 others like this.
  2. KC2YMO

    KC2YMO Ham Member QRZ Page

    "Someone" needs a safe space.
     
    N8VIL, KF4ZKU, WD4IGX and 2 others like this.
  3. AC0OB

    AC0OB Subscriber QRZ Page

    N2EY and K0UO like this.
  4. W1LWT

    W1LWT Ham Member QRZ Page

    just another Government way of tracking us . To control our way of life .just like england control and pay tax on towers and tv antennas and any antennas....This is another way of tracking us in our free country...
     
    KA9UCE, K0UO, KC2YMO and 1 other person like this.
  5. KC2YMO

    KC2YMO Ham Member QRZ Page

    Yea........and?
     
  6. K0DD

    K0DD Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    Things like this NEED to always be on Ham's minds. We have to jump through some loopholes to install a tower here IN TOWN. The city airport and uncontrolled field is on the edge of town and we need to stay outside the glidepath to the runway. I haven't looked at the map yet, as I'm not ready for a tower here, but Aircraft fly over the house all the time and I could walk to the airport from here. 50' would be a no-brainer, but 120' of Bertha pole could be an issue and not approved by city council.

    Just looked we are within a few degrees of the runway centerline about 1.2 miles to our NNW.

    Erika DD
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2019
  7. WN1MB

    WN1MB Ham Member QRZ Page

    My silly 60' of #26 magnet wire strung out to a cluster of trees looks better and better after reading this thread.
     
    K0DD, KF4ZKU, WR2E and 1 other person like this.
  8. WN1MB

    WN1MB Ham Member QRZ Page

    Speaking of poopie...you didn't mention if the pilot requested a new pair of undershorts as part of the settlement.
     
    K3RLD, PA0MHS, AA4MB and 4 others like this.
  9. K3WKK

    K3WKK Ham Member QRZ Page

    When the FAA refers to AG aircraft, that means "Crop Dusters" that treat fields...
     
    WK0DX and K0UO like this.
  10. K0DD

    K0DD Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    I was just looking over that one again, and I really should have... If that had happened to me, I KNOW I'd be doing more than inspecting the damage to the plane... The first thing would have been "Clean up in Isle 1..."

    DD
     
    KC2YMO likes this.

Share This Page