http://www.leagle.com/decision/19871690681FSupp1009_11551/BODONY v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF SANDS POINT The link above is a summary of actions taken between a ham op and a local government after PRB-1 was enacted. It's very interesting in that it lays out the arguments from both sides and the resolution. What is most interesting to me is what is written in footnote 2. I won't give anything away but in its own way it gives us an idea of what the government sees as reasonable. By the way, six meters is open on the east coast.