FCC Extends Waiver Permitting Use of PACTOR 4 for Hurricane Relief Efforts

Discussion in 'Amateur Radio News' started by KS2G, Sep 6, 2019.

ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: K5AB-Elect-1
ad: L-MFJ
ad: Left-2
ad: MessiPaoloni-1
ad: Subscribe
ad: Left-3
  1. KS2G

    KS2G Subscriber QRZ Page

    K9CTB likes this.
  2. KQ6XA

    KQ6XA Ham Member QRZ Page

    PACTOR 4.
    America's FCC wants it to pop into existence --out of thin air-- during times of emergency.
    Then later, they want to put it back in the Technology Jail.

    What would hams say if they did that with SSB?
    K4WWK, SA6CKE, N9LYA and 1 other person like this.
  3. K3DCW

    K3DCW QRZ Lifetime Member #212 Volunteer Moderator Platinum Subscriber Life Member QRZ Page

    The sarcasm is misdirected. The FCC didn't ask for PACTOR-4 to be put to use: the League did. The FCC simply approved the request and then an extension.
    K9CTB, K3XR, ND6M and 3 others like this.
  4. K0IDT

    K0IDT Ham Member QRZ Page

    Will it actually see any use this time? 3-4 previous STA fails say it won't be used, or needed.
    K3DCW likes this.
  5. KK5JY

    KK5JY Premium Subscriber QRZ Page

    That's what I want to know, as well. Are there any AR hurricane operations? Are they operations that can't be done with other normally-street-legal modes?
    KF4ZKU likes this.
  6. K9CTB

    K9CTB Ham Member QRZ Page

    If we're truly interested in "advancing the radio art", the symbol rate rule has to go. High-speed, low bandwidth communications are here now ... and they're effective, whether or not they're used on the "hurricane net". It's time to get serious if amateur radio is to continue playing a role in emergency communications .... beyond monitoring the parking lots for the actual players.
    N0TRK, SA6CKE and KF4ZKU like this.
  7. K0IDT

    K0IDT Ham Member QRZ Page

    The FCC stopped requiring reporting to the DIRS database on Sept. 7. No need for amateurs by the look of it.
  8. K0IDT

    K0IDT Ham Member QRZ Page


    Amateur radio hasn't been a "serious" player in emergency communications for quite some time. The diehards refuse to recognize the obvious going so far as to interpret Part 97.1(a) as a mandate, the only reason for amateur radio to exist, and the really hilarious one was the claim that it's a "statutory obligation". Look up the definition of "statutory obligation" and then explain to every licensed amateur that they are subject to a "legal duty" to preform a "voluntary"
    (97.1(a)) service.
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2019 at 4:44 AM
  9. K9CTB

    K9CTB Ham Member QRZ Page

    Agreed, sir. IMHO the ARRL and the ham community at-large have caused their own problem. And all the QST articles about green-vest high-school students with their Baofengs or their "go kits" ain't gonna change that.
    NE1U and K0IDT like this.
  10. W5TXR

    W5TXR XML Subscriber QRZ Page

    Why is PACTOR 4 a question in use? Is it a BW issue?
    I don't use PACTOR and Im not familiar with it.
    W3FHT likes this.

Share This Page