View Full Version : CLINTON HOLDOVER CIA LEAKER
No surprise, that in the Clinton Administrations efforts to decimate the CIA, a holdover from that administration would be found to have leaked intelligence information.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_id=49863
http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=4971
K0RGR
04-22-2006, 11:58 PM
Did you happen to notice the spin that Mr. Limbaugh's website - WorldNutsDaily- put on that story?
It's no big deal that Mr. Bush's bunch is running prisons that violate every treaty since the New Testament, but the person accused of leaking the information, who deserves a medal if true, was a non-political employee in the Clinton administration? Karl Rove must be straining at gnats these days to try to throw the dogs off the scent. Unfortunately, you smell this administration 4 states away.
A lot of Democrats work in the government - some of them are bureaucrats in the White House and were hired after Clinton left office.
The biggest mistake this President made when he entered office was to keep too many Clinton agents/spies on staff instead of firing every last one of them the same way the (2) Clinton's fired everyone that worked for Bush 1 so he could put in all his co-conspirators and traitors.
K2WH
Quote[/b] (K2WH @ April 23 2006,01:26)]The biggest mistake this President made when he entered office was to keep too many Clinton agents/spies on staff instead of firing every last one of them the same way the (2) Clinton's fired everyone that worked for Bush 1 so he could put in all his co-conspirators and traitors.
K2WH
Your Kind of Correct. Bush Had all his Own, Crooks, Criminals, spies and Hit men to come into Office with him.
Gee, Have you read the News? I think about Half of his
( Republican) clan is under Indictment or suspected of something.
The only thing you have wrong is about Clinton's Traitors. Clinton didn't have Traitors... That is what the Bush people have. Many of them too, I might add.
I said it before, and I will say it again. Bush and his Cronies have to be the MOST crooked Administaration in My lifetime.
" Hillary in 2008". Then perhaps she can have Bush Prosocuted for his Crimes !!!
That would Be COOL !!
Gordon
wa6ccw
04-23-2006, 02:16 AM
Quote[/b] (K0RGR @ April 23 2006,06:58)]Did you happen to notice the spin that Mr. Limbaugh's website - WorldNutsDaily- put on that story?
Actually, no, I can't find any website with the title "WorldNutsDaily" operated by anyone by the name of "Mr. Limbaugh".
There is, however, a website titled "WorldNetDaily" whose Editor and CEO is a person by the name of "Joseph Farah".
Hope that clears it up for you.
wa6ccw
04-23-2006, 02:24 AM
Quote[/b] (N6WK @ April 23 2006,08:32)]I said it before, and I will say it again. #Bush and his Cronies have to be the MOST crooked Administaration in My lifetime.
Ha, ha, ha, yeah... as if that has any value - coming from a partisan zealot like you.
Geez. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
w5klb
04-23-2006, 02:54 AM
Quote[/b] (N6WK @ April 22 2006,18:32)]" Hillary in 2008". #Then perhaps she can have Bush Prosocuted for his Crimes !!!
That would Be COOL !!
Gordon
Yeah, now there's ANOTHER fine example of skirting laws. Example: "Travelgate", "Whitewater", and "The Rose Law Firm". And let's not forget getting caught trying to steal the Whitehouse furniture.... ooops. Maybe she got "disoriented" and thought she was at a "Holiday Inn" and was only trying to take the towels and soap. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
BTW, I'm thinking about helping Hiliary's Presidential Campain and buy a "Run, Hilliary, Run" bumper sticker for the front bumper of my truck. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
KA9VQF
04-23-2006, 05:09 AM
From the Reuters link
The CIA would not say what the leak involved, and declined to identify the officer or describe the officer's duties at the agency, saying that such disclosures would violate the Privacy Act of 1974.
From world net daily
The CIA would not say what the leak involved, and declined to identify the officer or describe the officer's duties at the agency, saying that such disclosures would violate the Privacy Act of 1974.
I wonder how if the CIA has declined to identify the officer how does the world net daily have the information that it was Mary O'Neil McCarthy?
Is this yet another leak? Or did lord Bush declassify it?
W8EFA
04-23-2006, 05:31 AM
Quote[/b] ]Yeah, now there's ANOTHER fine example of skirting laws. Example: "Travelgate", "Whitewater", and "The Rose Law Firm". And let's not forget getting caught trying to steal the Whitehouse furniture
Whitewater and travelgate as an example? #Better go read your history KLB. Whitewater a deal where the Clintons didn't even make any money and travelgate where they did what all other presidents did and staffed who they wanted. You are trying to bring up the failed Republican Witch Hunts that proved fruitless and a waste of taxpayers money, and backfired against the Republican idiots? The american people saw through it and Clinton left with a 70% approval rating. #Meanwhile GWB's Crooks have all been indicted for REAL CRIMES and will be doing time for them.
I won't even adress the Furniture BS as that is all it was - how ridiculous.
Travelgate - The White House Travel Office is in the residential section of the White House, and as such, staffers serve strictly as the pleasure of the president. Historically, a change of administrations usually resulted in a brand new Travel Office staff. Despite the established presidential privilege of replacing staffers at will, Congressional Republicans alleged that friends of President Bill Clinton, including his cousin Catherine Cornelius, had engineered the firings in order to get the business for themselves
After a three-year investigation, the Chair of the committee, Pennsylvania Republican William Clinger, accused the Clinton administration of having obstructed the committee's efforts to investigate the Travelgate scandal. #Ultimately, a president's right to staff his residential quarters with persons of his choosing prevailed and no grounds for legal action could be established.
Bill Clinton later described the allegations and investigation as "a fraud".
Whitewater -
Three separate inquiries determined that the evidence was insufficient to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the Clintons knowingly participated in any criminal conduct.
In 1998, the independent counsel Kenneth Starr sent a report to Congress in which he charged Clinton with perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and abuse of authority in the Paula Jones lawsuit. The report contained details, sometimes explicit, of Clinton's liaisons with Monica Lewinsky. Detractors of the independent counsel criticized Starr for expanding the investigation beyond its initial scope and for the graphic nature of the report. When asked to specify which statement of Clinton's was perjurious, Starr could not answer the question.
Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives in December 1998, on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, and tried by the Senate in January 1999. But in an eery repeat of Starr's failure, none of the prosecutors could specify which lines of Clinton's testimony was perjurious and Clinton was acquitted by the Senate on both counts.
Republicans suffered a substantial political backlash in the wake of the investigations and impeachment. Clinton served his last two years in office without any further attacks of a serious legal nature but continued to be criticized by his detractors for the scandals. Clinton's job approval rating skyrocketed to the mid-seventies during impeachment and he later left office with the highest approval ratings of any president of the twentieth century.
Travelgate (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelgate)
Whitewater (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_scandal)
w5klb
04-23-2006, 08:19 AM
It still doesn't clear up the little matter of $100,000 Hilliary made from a $1000 investment on commodities. Nor does it attempt to 'splain her attemps of trying to cover up her records at the Rose Law Firm. The person who might of cleared this all up is dead from a suicide. Hmmm... wonder what would cause a man like that, involved with the Klinton's, to kill himself? Must of been pretty awful. And Starr's investigation did cause a President to be impeached. At least he had some evidence to present. Unlike Bush, who you would just looove to impeach but can't and never will. But go ahead and dream, if it will make you feel better.
If Hilliary is the best you all have to offer, than be prepared for another disappointing Presidential Election. With Howard Dean as head of the DNC and Hilliary running for President, you all are destined to be a minority party for a long time to come. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
W8EFA
04-23-2006, 11:33 AM
Why don't you reference some reliable source on all this money she made? Since you made false accusations about watergate and travelgate you have zero credibility. This is just another bogus conspiracy you have in your little prejiduced right wing mind.
Just burns you up that Cliton was so successful leaving with a 70% approval, the highest of any president rating and Bush at the lowest.
Unlike Clinton when Bush gets impeached it will be for lies about Iraq wasting thousands of soldiers lifes, hundreds of thousands Iraquis dead and knowingly breaking the law an the constitution with illegal wiretaps.
The Republicans are all already the minority party due to GWB's complete incompetetence. They will be taking back the Congress in the midterms by all indications.
Quote[/b] ]Why don't you reference some reliable source on all this money she made?
Hillary's "miraculous", (not my word, the word was used by a 30 yr. veteran in futures trading) $100,000 windfall in the beef futures market is very well documented. Do a google search. Why don't you do you try to keep up?
W8EFA
04-23-2006, 04:18 PM
Quote[/b] (AC0H @ April 23 2006,11:45)]Quote[/b] ]Why don't you reference some reliable source on all this money she made?
Hillary's "miraculous", (not my word, the word was used by a 30 yr. veteran in futures trading) $100,000 windfall in the beef futures market is very well documented. Do a google search. Why don't you do you try to keep up?
No it is not up to me to prove your points. Reference a credible source to back up your assertions, however I doubt you have the ability to do so.
Jeez Looeze EFA. I found the file Zero Hotel was looking for, I think. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
$170,000 one day trade (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/01/elec04.neil.bush.ap/)
Keep him on his toes, Kevin.
wa8rti
04-23-2006, 06:40 PM
When government bureaucrats become abusive of their powers we better hope there are insiders with the guts to leak it to the press. I have yet to hear a credible reason as to why GWB and his troops could not use the available secret court (per the foreign intelligence whatever act) to get warrants before putting wire taps in place. #It is only a short step from warrantless spying #on supposed terrorist and doing it to innocent Americans. #Nixon would have gotten away with his little act of treason to the Constitution without ''deep throat'. He should have been impeached. And I speak as one who had a great-grandmother whose maiden name was Nixon. The sob was a distant cousin. #(I will give Tricky Dick credit for stepping down when he did. I half expected him to declare a state of emergency and suspend civil liberties.) And the argument that other presidents have done similar things to what GWB has done doesn't fly. That was then and this is now and what he and the CIA did #could have been done within the framework of the law and mechanisms Congress provided. If Clinton could be impeached for what he did, GWB sure would seem like a candidate for a similar treatment.
RTI. Republicans are not to be held responsible for their actions. Make the middle class pay.
Do we care that we were dealt a hoax by the administration to get us into Iraq? No. Republicans are like greased pigs. Just can't catch 'em, the swine.
Wiretapping Americans is a Republican hobby.
What about the Whitehouse leak cover-up? Slick Walker is guilty, but walks away.
And many people on this forum would be honored if Dubya walked into their homes and defficated on their carpet.
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ April 25 2006,03:42)]RTI. Republicans are not to be held responsible for their actions. Make the middle class pay.
Do we care that we were dealt a hoax by the administration to get us into Iraq? No. Republicans are like greased pigs. Just can't catch 'em, the swine.
Wiretapping Americans is a Republican hobby.
What about the Whitehouse leak cover-up? Slick Walker is guilty, but walks away.
And many people on this forum would be honored if Dubya walked into their homes and defficated on their carpet.
Well, You can BET, I am NOT one of them.
I personally really, really, really, dislike George W. Bush.
To me, He is one of the WORST disasters to ever come down on America!
I sure hope we can survive this disaster!
Gordon
Quote[/b] ]To me, He is one of the WORST disasters to ever come down on America!
I sure hope we can survive this disaster!
Gordon
I disagree. By far, he is the single worst disaster to hit America. They don't call him Bush Laden for nothing.
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ April 25 2006,04:07)]They don't call him Bush Laden for nothing.
I like that... Can I use it??
Sure. Just don't let those darned Bush Bashers get a hold of it.
I would never bash Bush.
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ April 25 2006,04:23)]Sure. Just don't let those darned Bush Bashers get a hold of it.
I would never bash Bush.
Thanks Jerry,
I'll make sure NO bush Bashers get a hold of it.
73,
Gordon
kf6rdn
04-25-2006, 03:33 AM
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ April 24 2006,19:07)]Quote[/b] ]To me, He is one of the WORST disasters to ever come down on America!
I sure hope we can survive this disaster!
Gordon
I disagree. #By far, he is the single worst disaster to hit America. #They don't call him Bush Laden for nothing.
They get paid? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif
No access to Leak Information (http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12468537/)
Is it possible, McCarthy had no access to the information leaked to the press? Could it simply be that this whole thing was a frame job? Is the criminal administration back at it again?
Hmmm.