PDA

View Full Version : Todays WSJ


n3ixq
09-01-2005, 10:12 PM
Power Outages Hamstring Most Emergency Communications

Moderator's note:

Please provide a link to the article. No matter the subject, posting anything other than a brief quotation of the article is a violation of the Copyright Law of the United States of America. There are persons who closely watch this site for copyright violations and who can "cause problems" if copyrighted material is allowed to remain.

Posting a link to the article is definitely not against the law and is the preferred method here on QRZ.com.

Glen, K9STH
One of the QRZ.com moderators

KC9ECI
09-01-2005, 10:32 PM
Ooooo....I feel the wrath of the copyright police about to be visited on -IXQ.

W7DJM
09-01-2005, 10:47 PM
"""In the meantime, the communication gap is being filled by a low-tech solution: ham-radio operators"""


Read that again, read it carefully. #We "ham" operators are "low tech."


By the way---your fancy green text---ain't makin it.

n2nh
09-02-2005, 12:46 AM
Quote[/b] (W7DJM @ Sep. 01 2005,18:47)]"""In the meantime, the communication gap is being filled by a low-tech solution: ham-radio operators"""


Read that again, read it carefully. We "ham" operators are "low tech."


By the way---your fancy green text---ain't makin it.
Anybody got a link for the WSJ story? The only ones I see require a lengthy and expensive subscription. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif

<span style='color:darkgreen'>If ya just gotta use green, try "darkgreen" please...that other color is unreadable.</span>

G8ADD
09-02-2005, 09:01 AM
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Sep. 01 2005,17:46)]Quote[/b] (W7DJM @ Sep. 01 2005,18:47)]"""In the meantime, the communication gap is being filled by a low-tech solution: ham-radio operators"""


Read that again, read it carefully. #We "ham" operators are "low tech."


By the way---your fancy green text---ain't makin it.
Anybody got a link for the WSJ story? #The only ones I see require a lengthy and expensive subscription. #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif

<span style='color:darkgreen'>If ya just gotta use green, try "darkgreen" please...that other color is unreadable.</span>
It only takes a few seconds to highlight it.

73

Brian G8ADD

WA2ZDY
09-02-2005, 10:32 AM
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Sep. 01 2005,20:46)]Anybody got a link for the WSJ story? #The only ones I see require a lengthy and expensive subscription. #:(
We may be low tech but notice who's getting the job done.

The Wall Street Journal is for rich folks, even though I used to read it and it is really a pretty good paper. But no, nothing about the WSJ is cheap or free. I think we won't be reading this one . . .

N4QX
09-02-2005, 11:13 AM
I have this morning's copy in front of me, but have yet to find te reference on either the print or online editions.

If someone (perhaps the OP) could provide a page cite, I could try to find an online link for subscribers. Otherwise, it's $1 on any local newsstand.

n2nh
09-02-2005, 11:45 AM
Quote[/b] (WA2ZDY @ Sep. 02 2005,06:32)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Sep. 01 2005,20:46)]Anybody got a link for the WSJ story? The only ones I see require a lengthy and expensive subscription. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif
We may be low tech but notice who's getting the job done.

The Wall Street Journal is for rich folks, even though I used to read it and it is really a pretty good paper. But no, nothing about the WSJ is cheap or free. I think we won't be reading this one . . .
Speaking of 'low tech', isn't Print Media low tech these days? Particularly green-unfriendly newspapers? At least Hams make the most of our resources and that doesn't mean depleting them. Hmmm... makes me think the 'journalist' hasn't seen a modern ham shack.