PDA

View Full Version : FCC Considers 2.4GHz Shuffle NPRM


04-05-2002, 02:39 AM
FCC Proceeding Puts New Pressure on Amateur Microwave Band

NEWINGTON, CT, Apr 4, 2001--The FCC has again targeted Amateur Radio's primary allocation at 2390 to 2400 MHz for possible sharing or use by other radio services. A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (WT Docket 02-55)--released in mid-March but not yet available for public comment--invites comments on either sharing the band with public safety services being displaced from 800 MHz or moving amateurs elsewhere. The ARRL plans to file comments in the proceeding.

The FCC says increasing incidents of harmful interference to public safety systems in the 800-MHz band prompted the rulemaking proceeding, "Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band." To alleviate the problem, the Commission now is exploring the possibility of restructuring the 800 MHz band and moving some occupants elsewhere.

"In this proceeding, if commenting parties believe that incumbent amateur services cannot co-exist with relocated 800 MHz services," the FCC said, "we seek comment on whether incumbent amateur services could be relocated, what spectrum could be used for their relocation, and what procedures would apply to such relocation." The FCC NPRM identifies the 2390-2400 MHz band as an "Unlicensed PCS Band." Unlicensed, asynchronous PCS devices were authorized there in 1995, but Amateur Radio remains primary on the segment.

The FCC also will seek comments on whether existing UPCS operations could continue in the band or be forced to cease. It also wants input on "the suitability of the 2390-2400 MHz band as replacement spectrum and whether there are other band segments with which this band could be paired." The FCC noted that the adjacent 2385-2390 MHz segment already is slated for auction.

The FCC said its discussion of 2390-2400 MHz and other segments in terms of replacement spectrum was intended to be "illustrative rather than exclusive" and that other bands "may also merit consideration."

Just last summer, the FCC invited comments on its proposals to reallocate some spectrum in the 2390 to 2400 MHz amateur segment--as well as in the non-amateur 1.9 and 2.1 GHz bands--for possible use by unspecified mobile and fixed services. The Commission has proposed 2390 to 2400 MHz and other bands to support the introduction of advanced wireless systems, including so-called third-generation (3G) mobile systems. The FCC also has asked for comments on whether amateurs could share the band with government users. Should it reallocate 1755-1850 MHz--now occupied by federal government users--for advanced wireless services, the Commission has hinted that it might consider again lumping relocated federal government users with amateurs on 2390-2400 MHz.

The ARRL has petitioned the FCC to upgrade the adjacent Amateur Radio 2400-2402 MHz allocation from secondary to primary, mainly to protect satellite operations. The AO-40 satellite has been successfully using the band for downlink telemetry and transponder operation, and AMSAT plans a similar downlink for its next satellite project. The Amateur Service already is primary at 2402-2417 MHz. There's a secondary amateur allocation at 2417-2450 MHz.

The 2390-2400 MHz band was reallocated from federal government to exclusive non-government use pursuant to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. When the FCC elevated Amateur Radio from secondary to primary status on the band in 1995, it also allocated the spectrum for use by unlicensed Part 15 devices, reasoning that hams and unlicensed devices had proven able to share spectrum, and it wanted to preserve adequate spectrum for Amateur Radio. At about the same time, the FCC concluded that an allocation for certain proposed wide-area, high-power fixed and mobile services "would be incompatible with amateur use."

Last year, the ARRL re-petitioned the FCC for primary status at 2300 to 2305 MHz. That petition faces competition from AeroAstro, which wants co-primary status with the Amateur Service for its commercial satellite-based location service.

The complete NPRM (http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.doc) is available via the FCC Web site. The FCC will officially invite comments for 30 days after the NPRM is published in the Federal Register. Reply comments will be due 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. Some related notices and correspondence already are available via the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System (http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html). Click on "Search for Filed Comments" and enter "02-55" in the "Proceeding" field.

NN6EE
04-05-2002, 06:57 PM
RM,

# What I'd like to know is actually who gave the FCC the right to AUCTION-OFF any frequencies in the first place??? #The entire RADIO SPECTRUM are "PUBLIC DOMAIN" not OWNED BY ANYONE, least of all the GOVERNMENTS OF ANY COUNTRIES here on our Earth!!! And besides there's nothing in our CONSTITUTION that I know of, to PERMIT THEM TO DO IT!!! OH, maybe they're just INTERPERTING the good Ol' document in the way THEY WANT TO, having nothing to do with the "PUBLIC GOOD"http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif #

# ARROGANCE is alive and well @ "FOGGY-BOTTOM" isn't it??? #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif

nn6ee http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif

WA6CAW
04-05-2002, 08:31 PM
Hey, Have you got a "brain tumah"?

Maybe we can get some law suits going for all the hams.....
Hmmmmm......

Here is a breaking news update featured in today's RCR Wireless News online update.

Hardell brain-cancer study to be published, may affect Newman case

April 05, 2002 11:31 AM EST

WASHINGTON—Lawyers for Christopher Newman in an $800 million brain-cancer lawsuit against the mobile-phone industry have notified the federal judge overseeing the case that an unpublished study attacked by defendants has been accepted for publication, a potentially major development that could change the course of the case.

Sources said an epidemiology study conducted by Dr. Lennart Hardell, who found a higher incidence of brain tumors on the sides of heads used by mobile-phone subscribers to make and receive calls, will be published in June by the European Journal of Cancer Prevention. Hardell is a key expert witness for Newman, who is represented by the law firm of high-powered Baltimore trial lawyer Peter Angelos. At a February hearing in Baltimore federal court on the admissibility of scientific experts, industry lawyers made much of the fact that the Lancet, a prestigious scientific journal in the United Kingdom, had rejected Hardell's study.

The latest twist in the litigation comes as U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake nears a ruling on whether to let the Newman case go to trial. The case is being watched closely, since no mobile-phone cancer suit has succeeded, let alone reached a jury.

At least eight brain-cancer cases against the wireless industry are pending in courts around the country, most filed by a small group of lawyers in Maryland and Michigan. The lawyers plan to file another six to eight lawsuits against mobile-phone firms within the next two weeks.

On the regulatory front, the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Communications Commission plan shortly to launch a joint Web site on mobile-phone health and safety. The General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress, last year criticized the agencies for not doing enough to inform the public about wireless radiation health issues.

The government's new outreach effort comes just weeks after epidemiologist George Carlo unveiled a Web-based health registry that collects data from consumers who believe they've been injured from mobile-phone radiation. The registry has attracted significant interest, recording nearly 100,000 hits in the first two weeks.

Carlo, who managed a $28 million industry-funded research project that found genetic damage from low-level radiofrequency radiation, has become a thorn in the side of wireless firms and federal regulators as a result of his harsh criticism of their efforts to address the cancer controversy.
(article used by permission of RCR News e-mail)

And ......
Here is some more info on spectrum work on "the Hill".
http://www.rcrnews.com/cgi-bin/article.pl?articleId=39434


de WA6CAW

K9STH
04-05-2002, 09:24 PM
If portable telephone equipment causes problems, the PCS frequencies are much more "apt" than the 800 MHz frequencies. First of all, look at the frequencies used by microwave ovens. Those are chosen for the ability to boil water. And, I have been told by numerous "medical" sources that the human cranium is self resonant around 2 GHz. That is the frequency range of the PCS units.

However, since the days of Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla, the "naysayers" have been claiming all sorts of ills due to electricity. In fact, when electric lights were first installed in hotels, many hotels actually put up a sign that stated that the electricity was not harmful to the body. You can buy reproductions of these signs from various sources.

There are more lawyers in the United States than, I believe, in the rest of the world combined. With that many looking for "things to do", there are always going to be law suits brought against virtually anything.

As the lawyer says, "you win some and you lose some. But, you get paid for all of them!"

You hear that terrorists took over a courthouse full of lawyers? They threatened to relase one each hour unless their demands were met!

I know a lot of lawyers. Most of them say that they would be offended by any lawyer joke that wasn't a true story, and, they hadn't heard one that offended them!

Glen, K9STH

WA6CAW
04-05-2002, 10:38 PM
Very good, Glen, I think your comedy views are hilarious, and right on target.

Maybe we should start a joke thread for all the comedians on this net..... There seems to be quite a few.

Seriously, I had my own 2-way shop when 800MHz first became available for commercial use. #Mobile units operated as high as 35 watts. #Soon there were warning stickers that came with the radio, to be stuck somewhere on the radio, that stated you should not transmit while anybody was with in 15 feet of the antenna. #To prove the danger, I shoved a hotdog down on the 1/4 wave spike antenna(approx 3") and keyed the tx for about 8 -10 minutes. The grease started to run out of the hotdog, down on the roof of the car. Scared a few people, so they decided not to transmit while outside the car, anyway.

Later, the output power started decreasing, from the various manufacturing companies. We are talking time wise, about 1980, and later.

Motorola did decrease the power of the 800MHz StarTac from 1 watt to 0.25 watt recently. The reason was because the battery life would be extended.

Yeah, right !

LM
WA6CAW