PDA

View Full Version : Canadian says "Kofi Must Go."


N7AAO
12-06-2004, 07:27 PM
Courtesy Canadian National Post (http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/comment/story.html?id=6e57a820-683c-4853-baaa-3787d7612019):

Quote[/b] ]Last Wednesday, Norm Coleman, a Republican from Minnesota and co-chairman of the U.S. Senate subcommittee investigating the United Nations oil-for-food program in Iraq, called on UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to resign in a commentary published in The Wall Street Journal. While Britain, Germany, France, Russia and China quickly rallied to Mr. Annan's defence, there can be no doubt that the senator is correct: Mr. Annan has to go.

As Mr. Coleman argues, "the most extensive fraud in the history of the United Nations occurred on [Mr. Annan's] watch." Over the decade-long run of the oil-for-food program, the UN and several member states looked on as Saddam Hussein siphoned off at least 20% of its $100-billion revenues for his personal use. Hundreds of millions went to rebuilding the Iraqi army; more was paid out in kickbacks to Western politicians, governments, political parties, journalists and UN officials who looked the other way. Tens of millions funded terrorist training and operations around the world, particularly among Palestinians. The grandiose, sprawling palaces U.S. troops discovered when they liberated Baghdad and other Iraqi cities were constructed by Saddam and his family with the proceeds from oil sales meant to pay for food and medicines for ordinary Iraqis. Critics of the American- and British-backed sanctions against Iraq that were in place from the early 1990s until the 2003 invasion claimed they were responsible for the deaths of 100,000 Iraqis per year through malnutrition and disease. But we now know it was Saddam's lust for gold plumbing fixtures and weapons that caused the lion's share of Iraqi hardship.

Under Mr. Annan's leadership, the UN feigned blindness to all this. To make matters worse, it recently became clear that Mr. Annan's son Kojo was a beneficiary of oil-for-food largesse. The Swiss firm appointed to certify that Iraqi oil sale proceeds were indeed going to buy human essentials (which clearly was not doing its job) paid the junior Annan hundreds of thousands of dollars in untendered consulting contracts. And while Mr. Annan once claimed Kojo's financial affiliation with the company ended long ago, it has now come to light that it continued till well after Saddam's fall from power.

[...]

Even putting Iraq and the oil-for-food scandal aside, the case against Mr. Annan is damning. While Mr. Annan made some early progress in streamlining the United Nations' grotesquely bloated bureaucracy, he has since presided over a crisis in staff confidence, in part thanks to his bungled efforts to sweep aside sexual harassment charges against one of his deputies. Two weeks ago, UN workers in New York City voted that they had lost faith in the Secretary-General's ability and that of his senior administrators.

Mr. Annan has also watched as the UN Human Rights Commission has degenerated into a laughingstock run by some of the worst human-rights abusers in the world. He has refused to stop the UN agency responsible for delivering humanitarian aid to Palestinian refugees from assisting terrorists. And from Rwanda to Srebrenica, East Timor to Sudan, he has time and again permitted himself to be conned by tyrants and butchers while they have murdered hundreds of thousands of innocents.

I don't think I can add much to that, except to remind everyone that this is coming from good old liberal Canada.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif

W3MIV
12-06-2004, 07:37 PM
Quote[/b] (N7AAO @ Dec. 06 2004,15:27)]I don't think I can add much to that, except to remind everyone that this is coming from good old liberal Canada.
Canada is not all that "liberal" in the worst sense of the word.

Their "liberal" problem is, like that of the US, a matter of a concentration of elitist whackoes. Ours are on the Left Coast and in the effete NE. Canada's nattering nabobs are in Quebec and Ontario more than in the rest of Canada.

Most Canadians are decent folks who value the nation along their southern border even as they celebrate their own land. They have a growing problem with the immigration policies foisted on the nation by the lefties and a growing number of Canadians are worrying about the future that these policies are nurturing.

N7AAO
12-06-2004, 10:00 PM
Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Dec. 06 2004,12:37)]Quote[/b] (N7AAO @ Dec. 06 2004,15:27)]I don't think I can add much to that, except to remind everyone that this is coming from good old liberal Canada.
Canada is not all that "liberal" in the worst sense of the word.

Their "liberal" problem is, like that of the US, a matter of a concentration of elitist whackoes. Ours are on the Left Coast and in the effete NE. Canada's nattering nabobs are in Quebec and Ontario more than in the rest of Canada.

Most Canadians are decent folks who value the nation along their southern border even as they celebrate their own land. They have a growing problem with the immigration policies foisted on the nation by the lefties and a growing number of Canadians are worrying about the future that these policies are nurturing.
I have an idea... let's gather up all the liberals from the US and Canada and give them some little island where they can create their socialist paradise.

That way, the rest of us would have freedom of choice (don't all liberals love choice?) without them trying to make us feel bad for what we choose. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

n9yb
12-06-2004, 10:33 PM
I think the UN-HQ should be moved to a country that would appreciate it more. I sadly reflect on the fact that maybe it is really us Ugly Americans at fault. Thus, the UN should give the bounty that their presense offers to another nation that would better appreciate it.


--

'Xcuse me whilst I remove me tongue from my cheek.

N7CPC
12-07-2004, 12:38 AM
Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and get the U.N. out of the U.S.!!!

N9YB.....Glad you mentioned pulling your toung from your cheek, OM. I waz gunna tell ya ta pull yer head outa yer...... http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

N7AAO
12-07-2004, 01:21 AM
Quote[/b] (N6WK @ Dec. 06 2004,18:02)]Quote[/b] (N7AAO @ Dec. 06 2004,23:00)]I have an idea... let's gather up all the liberals from the US and Canada and give them some little island where they can create their socialist paradise.
Why Not give the Liberals The US and you right wingers (along with Dubya) move to that little island?? That way you can all live Close together and be warm and fuzzy with each other.
Simple... there's more of us than there are of you... just look at the election results. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

N7AAO
12-07-2004, 03:42 AM
This just in:

The Democratic Leadership Council (http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253050&kaid=131&subid=192&FREM=Y&sid=19513&mid=9981) now says Kofi must go!

Quote[/b] ]Unfortunately, the United Nations' credibility has been steadily eroded by its own misdeeds, with a burgeoning scandal over its incompetent and sometimes corrupt management of the Iraq oil-for-food program being the most damaging example. Last week it was reported that the son of U.N. secretary general Kofi Annan received a series of payments from a Swiss firm that won a lucrative contract under the oil-for-food program. This development has fed growing doubts that the United Nations will be able to own up to its problems or reform its operations so long as Annan remains at the helm.

The appearance of a payoff to the secretary general's son was just the latest in a series of revelations about the oil-for-food program. Begun in 1996, the program allowed Baghdad to sell oil and use the proceeds to buy food and other humanitarian goods in order to soften the impact on the Iraqi people of the sanctions imposed on the country after Saddam's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. A U.N. committee supervised the program; vetted contracts for food purchases; arranged payments; and hired inspectors to ensure Iraq did not import material that could be used for arms.

But mismanagement, corruption, and manipulation of the program by Saddam Hussein allowed his regime to amass at least $21 billion outside of the United Nations' control, with the great bulk of that sum -- $17.3 billion -- pilfered between 1997 and 2003 on the secretary general's watch. In effect, the United Nations colluded in Saddam's successful evasion of U.N. sanctions. The most damning charge so far -- that a former chief of the oil-for-food program, Benon Sevan, accepted bribes from Saddam's regime -- was made in October by former U.N. weapons inspector Charles A. Duelfer, who led a Senate investigation into the scandal. The program is now the subject of at least four congressional investigations, three U.S. federal investigations and the U.N.-appointed commission of inquiry led by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker.

[...]

Annan's handling of the fallout over the past week has done nothing to improve his perceived credibility: He has refused requests from congressional committees for access to the United Nation's 55 internal audits and other reports, or for the chance to interview U.N. officials who oversaw the program, saying that it would interfere with the Volcker inquiry. That inquiry is expected to release an interim report in January. The full report could take another year and cost as much as $30 million -- to be funded with leftover cash in the oil-for-food program.

[...]

The secretary general should place this critical mission ahead of his personal interests, and step aside. Given his own lack of credibility on the oil-for-food program, this step is the price Annan must pay to help restore the U.N.'s credibility, and to salvage his legacy as secretary general. (emphasis added.)

Comments, N6WK, W8EFA?

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif

k9kxq
12-07-2004, 06:19 AM
Quote[/b] (N6WK @ Dec. 07 2004,00:29)]Quote[/b] (N7AAO @ Dec. 07 2004,04:42)]Comments, N6WK, W8EFA?
Are you sure you want any comments from me or EFA davie??
I got a comment! Davie, you can call me Jimmy if you like and not so fast now, how do you know for certain that there are
absolutly more right wingers than dems?

Davie, I feel that it is unfortunate we have four more years of Dubya, I intend to go on and make the best of it and then in 2008 we will get the help that we didn't in 2004...

kxq #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cool.gif