PDA

View Full Version : WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOO!!


K4KWH
10-29-2004, 10:14 PM
Them chicken banders say FCC is a paper tiger, they ain't interested in no pore ole CB what ain't hurtin' nuttin' on them extree channels, and they ain't got time to git atter them 'innocent' chicken banders!

Well, it's on arnewsline.org!~


It's about TIME!!!!!


73

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



** ENFORCEMENT: CB AMP SALE BRINGS $7000 FINE A North Jackson, Ohio equipment retailer has been dinged with a heavy fine. This for allegedly selling those illegal 11 meter amplifiers that the C-B crowd calls footwarmers. The noted violations involve Paladen Communications sale of external Citizens Band radio frequency power amplifiers. In it's October 21st Forfeiture Order the FCC alleges that Paladen, which does business as the CB Shop, did willfully and repeatedly violate Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 and Sections 2.815(b) and 2.815© of the Commission's Rules by making these units available to the general public. Paladen was issued the $7,000 fine back on May 27th. The FCC says the company never responded to the notice. Its now been given 30 days to pay or face collection proceedings. (FCC) ** ENFORCEMENT: CB OPERATOR FINED $10,000 FOR UNLICENSED OPERATION And using an illegal C-B amplifier will cost a Washington state operator some really big bucks. This as the FCC fines Robert A. Spiry of Tacoma 10,000 for what the FCC say was operating a radio station without Commission authorization. Amateur Radio Newsline's Norm Seeley, KI7UP, has the details: -- In its letter to Robert A. Spiry, the FCC claims that it found the amplifier as part of a follow-up investigation. This, after receiving numerous complaints from Spiry's neighbors. On March 13th, April 2nd, October 29th and November 5th of 2002, agents from the Commission's Seattle, Washington Field Office concluded that the interference resulted from 11 meter transmissions originating from Spiry's residence and from his mobile station in his vehicle. During station inspections conducted on April 2nd and November 5th, 2002, the Seattle Office agents determined that Spiry was operating transmitters that were not FCC certified and that he was operating with a linear amplifier attached to his CB radio transmitter. Spiry was advised that his use of unauthorized and non- certified equipment voided his blanket authority to operate his CB station. Nevertheless, the FCC says that he continued to operate the unauthorized equipment at the expense of his blanket authorization to operate his CB radio station. On December 30th, 2002, the Seattle Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Monetary Forfeiture in the amount of $10,000 to Spiry. In other words, a $10,000 fine. In his January 15, 2003 response Spiry did not dispute the facts that lead to the fine. Instead he stated that he had ceased CB radio transmissions and had obtained an amateur radio license. The FCC database lists him as holding a Technician class license with the call sign KD7TRB. He also claimed to have removed his CB radio antenna and asserted that he was unaware that the amount of the forfeiture could be so high. He told the FCC that he was unable to pay that amount. But in affirming the fine the FCC refers Spiry to Section 301 of the Communications Act. It says that no person shall use or operate any apparatus for the transmission of energy or communications or signals by radio within the United States without a proper license. The FCC says that Spiry's 2002 operation of his CB radio station with transmitters that were not FCC certified and use of a linear amplifier constitutes repeated violations. It also notes that his taking down the C-B antenna and getting a ham radio ticket are not sufficient actions to negate the punishment for the original offenses. The FCC says that Robert Spiry has not provided it with adequate financial information from which to determine his ability to pay the forfeiture. Based on this lack of information cancellation or reduction of the $10,000 fine is not warranted and that it stands as is. For the Amateur Radio Newsline, Norm Seeley, KI7UP, Scottsdale, Arizona. -- Spiry was given the usual 30 days to pay. If he fails to do so the FCC says that the matter may be turned over to the Department of Justice for further action. (FCC)

N8CPA
10-30-2004, 11:35 AM
A Cincinnati Amateur Radio Club maintains a wide area linked repeater system, that is now limited access. The reason it became limited access is because of all the abuse it suffered when it was open. But, when it was open, you could hear a lot of the misinformed CB types talking about how passing 5WPM would make using linears on 11M legal. And they couldn't be convinced otherwise. They just wouldn't listen to explanations that their beliefs were wrong. Apparently, Spiry shared that belief and tried to apply it with a Tech license. It appears he's about to get a $10,000 ear-cleaning so he'll listen better in the future.

K0RGR
10-30-2004, 02:17 PM
The sad thing is, BPL is really going to bring this to a head. A bootleg CBer running a few hundred watts may very well shut down the net for some distance around him. At first, this could be goodness, as it will cost the utilities some subscribers. But before long, any network problems will blamed on anybody with an antenna. It will be like TVI in the early 50's all over again. And if your town is using it to control the traffic lights, watch out!

I think you will see a much greater crackdown on high power CB by FCC, not to eliminate bootleggers, but in order to protect their new ugly child - at the expense of all HF radio.

KC7HDE
10-30-2004, 02:17 PM
two weeks ago I was tunning around 27.6000 and received SSTV.
I could not belive that the Chicken Banders were sending SSTV but they were.
The pictures were of naked women and of them selves with various CB equipment.





73
Norm T. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

ka5s
10-30-2004, 05:02 PM
Quote[/b] (K0RGR @ Oct. 30 2004,07:17)]I think you will see a much greater crackdown on high power CB by FCC, not to eliminate bootleggers, but in order to protect their new ugly child - at the expense of all HF radio.
If I recall correctly, the FCC has already proposed changes to Part 97 (the Amateur Radio Service) that would among other things once again allow import, manufacture and sale of HF, including 10-meter, amplifers. Thus, we may expect the CB problem to get worse.

However,the Commission is not the only agency with the ability to act against high-power or otherwise illegally operated CB stations. Congress some years ago passed legislation, which the President signed, delegating the Commission's authority in this matter to towns, cities, counties and states. They can enforce Part 95 rules now, if they wish.

Cortland

K4KWH
10-31-2004, 01:15 AM
Maybe the chicken banders will believe it now!

I can't recall how many times those guys said on the 'net, "When they start hitting H & Y and Copper, I'll believe it" HAHAHAHAHAH!


(I MEAN BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA)







Before the
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20554


Chester J. Massie, Jr. File No.: EB-04-DL-095
H and Y Electrical Supply Company, Inc. Citation: C20053250001
1714 Griffin Gate Road Sent via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Louisville, KY 40205
U.S. Mail and First Class


CITATION

Released: October 14, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office:

1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503( of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3

2. On September 20, 2004, the FCC received a confidential report alleging that H and Y Electrical Supply Company was marketing non-certified ``10-meter'' CB transceivers.

3. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that Chester J. Massie, Jr. / H and Y Electrical Supply Company, Inc. is offering for sale in its 2004 / 2005 WHOLESALE CATALOG the following non-certified Citizens Band transceivers:

NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION PAGE
Connex 3300Patriot$189.95 ``Band selector'' ``Band HI/LO'' 19
Connex 3300R $164.95 ``6 BANDS'' 17
Connex 3300HP $184.95 ``6 BANDS'' 17
Connex CX4400 HP $219.95 ``8 BANDS'' 16
Connex CX4800 DXL/E $299.95 ``12 BANDS 2400 CHANNELS'' 16
Connex Deer Hunter$119.95 ``120 CHANNELS'' 19
Connex Coyote Hunter $149.95 ``5 BANDS!'' 19
Connex Rebel $169.95 ``band selector'', ``band hi/lo switch'' 18
Connex Rebel HP $189.95 ``6 bands'' 18
Galaxy DX33HML Call ``Channels: 240 AM, 240 FM'' 7
Galaxy DX44V Call ``Channels: 361 AM, 361 FM'' 7
Galaxy DX-48T Call ``8 bands!'' 6
Galaxy DX55V Call ``Channels: 240 AM, 240 FM'' 7
Galaxy DX66V Call ``Channels: 361 AM, 361 FM'' 7, 8
Galaxy DX73V Call ``Channels: 361 AM, 361 FM'' 7

NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION PAGE
Galaxy 77 Call ``Channels: 271 AM, 271 FM'' 7
Galaxy DX88HL Call ``Band Switch'' 8
Galaxy DX-93T Call ``8 bands!'' 6
Galaxy DX95T Call ``8 BANDS!'' 5
Galaxy DX99V Call ``Robot/VC Switch'' 8
Galaxy DX2517 Call ``Band Select Switch'' 3
Galaxy EXR-45mp $Call ``8 bands!'' 11
Magnum 257 $179.95 21
Magnum 357 DX $349.95 21
Magnum 3200 $259.95 ``240 CHANNELS'' 4
Magnum Delta Force$209.95 ``Echo on/Off'' 21
Magnum M-1 $199.95 ``6 BANDS'' 23
Magnum Mini $ 69.95 ``40, 120, OR 400 CHANNEL RADIO''20
Magnum Omega Force$259.05 ``TALKBACK'' 21
Magnum S-3 $199.95 ``BAND SWITCH'', ``TALKBACK'' 22
Magnum S-9 $319.95 ``8 BANDS'' 22
Maverick A24 $189.95 ``BAND [SWITCH]'', ``ECHO ON/OFF'' 20
Mirage 66 $199.95 ``BAND CONTROL'', ``ROBOT/VC'' 23
Mirage 88 $259.95 ``Echo'', ``Band Switch'' 23
Ranger RCI-2950DX Call 23
Ranger RCI-2970 Call 23
Ranger RCI-2980WX Call 23
Ranger RCI-2985DX Call 23
Ranger RCI-2995DX Call 23
Ranger RCI-6300F25Call 23
Ranger RCI-6300F150 Call 23
Ranger RCI-6900F25Call 23
Ranger RCI-6900F150 Call 23
President Lincoln $289.95 15
SuperStar 3900 $159.95 ``a-b-c-d-e-f bands'' 13
SuperStar 3900GHP $159.95 ``6 BANDS'' 14
SuperStar 3900Plus $159.95 ``6 BANDS'' 12
SuperStar Grant $189.95 ``480 Channels'' 14
Voyage 9000 $199.95 ``6 BANDS'' 15

According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for
Citizens Band transmitters marketed in the United States.

4. Additionally, investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name hyelectronics.com is registered to H & Y Electronics Supply Company, 7504 Fegenbush Lane, Louisville, KY 40228-1571 with Chester Massie-Sr. listed as the administrative contact.

Furthermore, on October 1, 2004, H&Y Electronics with a mailing address listed as P.O. Box 39322, Louisville, KY and telephone number listed as 1-502-231-2931, offered for sale through its Internet site www.hyelectronics.com, the following non-certified Citizens Band transceivers:
NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION
Connex 4400 HP $226.55 ``Echo Switch'', ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
Connex 4800 DX LE $299.95 ``2400 CHANNELS''
Connex C-33PATHP $195.65
Connex C-48DXLE $308.95
Connex Coyote Hunter $154.45 ``band selector'', "FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
Connex CX-HPCF $195.65 ``echo/off switch'', ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
Galaxy ``88 refurb'' $259.95 ``ECHO''
Galaxy DX-2517 $419.95 ``*for export use only''
Galaxy DX-2547 $264.95 ``*For export use only''
Magnum 257 $179.95 ``AM/FM/LSB/USB''
Magnum M-1 $199.95 ``Echo'', ``Top Gun Modulator''
Mirage 66 $205.95 ``MOBILE''
Mirage 88 $238.95 ``SAME FEATURES AS THE GALAXY 88''
Mirage 88 $267.75 ``Band Selector'', ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
Mirage 99 $288.35 ``Robot/VC'', ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
Ranger 2950 DX $253.54
Ranger 2970 DX $411.99
Super Star 121 $144.15 ``AM/FM Mobile'', ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
SuperStar 3900 $144.15
SuperStar 3900 Gold $185.35 ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
SuperStar Gold HP $169.90
SuperStar Grant $195.65 ``FOR EXPORT USE ONLY''
SuperStar SS-122 $ 72.05 ``10 meter radio for export use only''

According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for Citizens Band transmitters marketed in the United States.

5. Section 302( of the Act2, and Section 2.815© of the Commission's Rules7 requires FCC Type Acceptance (or Certification) of External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers (or amplifier kits) capable of operation on any frequency or frequencies below 144 MHz. Furthermore, Section 2.815( (5)
2 47 U.S.C. § 302a(
9 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.80( (5)
12 See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3)
13 See 18 U.S.C. §1001



http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif



73

KB5WX
10-31-2004, 01:32 AM
It's sure about time . Good to see that Riley and crew are finally going after the source . Maybe Copper will be next . Keep after 'em , Riley !

ky5u
10-31-2004, 01:58 PM
Quote[/b] ]A Cincinnati Amateur Radio Club maintains a wide area linked repeater system, that is now limited access. #The reason it became limited access is because of all the abuse it suffered when it was open. #But, when it was open, you could hear a lot of the misinformed CB types talking about how passing 5WPM would make using linears on 11M legal. #And they couldn't be convinced otherwise. #

And what happens when we have the ARRL codeless HF license with a more simple test? What happens when the CBers mentioned in the quote above are made General Class Amateurs per the ARRL proposal?

That's why, whether you agree with code or no-code it is important to agree on ONE thing. #All our comments to the FCC on a notice of proposed rulemaking (when it happens) on removing the code MUST insist on a minimum of ensuring all no code HF licensees are segregated in their own band segments and not mixed in the current classes. #This is NOT about class. #It is about containing the experiment where it can be seen by all and evaluated without killing Amateur Radio.

If no code proponents are right, everything will be butterflies and bunny rabbits in the new segments. #If the nay sayers are right, at least the whole service won't be trashed.

N8CPA
10-31-2004, 02:43 PM
Quote[/b] (AG4YO @ Oct. 31 2004,09:58)]Quote[/b] ]A Cincinnati Amateur Radio Club maintains a wide area linked repeater system, that is now limited access. #The reason it became limited access is because of all the abuse it suffered when it was open. #But, when it was open, you could hear a lot of the misinformed CB types talking about how passing 5WPM would make using linears on 11M legal. #And they couldn't be convinced otherwise. #

And what happens when we have the ARRL codeless HF license with a more simple test? What happens when the CBers mentioned in the quote above are made General Class Amateurs per the ARRL proposal?

That's why, whether you agree with code or no-code it is important to agree on ONE thing. #All our comments to the FCC on a notice of proposed rulemaking (when it happens) on removing the code MUST insist on a minimum of ensuring all no code HF licensees are segregated in their own band segments and not mixed in the current classes. #This is NOT about class. #It is about containing the experiment where it can be seen by all and evaluated without killing Amateur Radio.

If no code proponents are right, everything will be butterflies and bunny rabbits in the new segments. #If the nay sayers are right, at least the whole service won't be trashed.
Amen!

KB1GYQ
10-31-2004, 02:57 PM
Back of the bus, seperate bathrooms, seperate bands; that's a real great idea http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif

N7AAO
10-31-2004, 03:05 PM
Quote[/b] (KB1GYQ @ Oct. 31 2004,07:57)]Back of the bus, seperate bathrooms, seperate bands; that's a real great idea http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif
Yeah, we can give them separate forums on QRZ too, where the elites don't have to mix with the riff-raff. [/sarcasm]

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif

p.s. Notice for the humor-deprived: the message above included sarcasm. Please take this into consideration when replying.

AB8TM
10-31-2004, 09:07 PM
Quote[/b] (K4KWH @ Oct. 30 2004,21:15)]2. On September 20, 2004, the FCC received a confidential report alleging that H and Y Electrical Supply Company was marketing non-certified ``10-meter'' CB transceivers.
OK, which one of you guys were the confidential informant? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif