PDA

View Full Version : Communist Party USA


AI4FR
10-13-2004, 01:00 PM
I knew that the "Communist Party USA" supports Kerry and that they are giving funds to his campaign. And just that right there should tell the American public all they need to know about Kerry and the type of person he is. What I do not understand is why will Kerry not denounce this group and distance himself from them.


But then I ran into the below article and it now all comes together.


Quote[/b] ]Ted Kennedy's Ties to the KGB

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., has become John Kerry's attack dog.

It is clear that John Edwards won't be as mean-spirited in his attacks on George Bush.

As NewsMax has detailed in Richard Poe's exhaustive investigation of Kennedy, it was Kennedy's machine that groomed Kerry for the White House.

Teddy has a lot to lose if Kerry sinks.

Teddy also will have unprecedented power in a Kerry White House. Clearly, a serious examination of Uncle Ted's views needs to be conducted before Election Day.

NewsMax was deeply disturbed by an article written last December by Herbert Romerstein for Human Events, the conservative weekly.

Romerstein, a former House intelligence committee staffer and a researcher of Soviet archives, uncovered numerous documents suggesting that Ted Kennedy was a "collaborationist" with the Soviets during our Cold War. Romerstein also co-authored, along with Eric Breindel, the highly praised "Verona Secrets, Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors."

According to Romerstein, a review of Soviet Communist Party archives offers an unflattering view of Kennedy. Some of the documents that have come to light since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 include claims that:

Sometime in 1978, Kennedy requested the KGB's assistance to set up a relationship between the Soviets and a firm owned by former Sen. John Tunney, D-Calif. Again, on March 5, 1980, Tunney, acting as Kennedy's liaison, met with KGB agents in Moscow. During that meeting, Tunney articulated Kennedy's position that "nonsense about ‘the Soviet military threat' and Soviet ambitions for military expansion in the Persian Gulf ... was being fueled by [President Jimmy] Carter, [National Security Advisor Zbigniew] Brzezinski, the Pentagon and the military industrial complex."

Kennedy, according to the documents, offered to speak out against President Carter on Afghanistan.

Romerstein notes that soon after the meeting, several public speeches subsequently were made by Kennedy criticizing Carter on his handling of Afghanistan.

This particular document was found in KGB archives by a KGB officer named Vasiliy Mitrokhin, who copied the records and defected to the West.

Other reports regarding Kennedy's affiliation with the Communists also were divulged.

According to information provided by the KGB, Kennedy told Tunney to carry a message to the general secretary of the Soviet Communist Party, Yuri Andropov.

Kennedy conveyed his concern over the anti-Soviet activities of then-President Ronald Reagan.

The KGB report said: "in Kennedy's opinion the opposition to Reagan remains weak. Speeches of the President's opponents are not well-coordinated and not effective enough, and Reagan has the chance to use successful counterpropaganda."

To appease the Soviets, Kennedy requested a meeting with Andropov for the purpose of "arming himself with the Soviet leader's explanations of arms control policy so he can use them later for more convincing speeches in the U.S."

Kennedy suggested that he could provide a venue to bring Soviet views to the major networks and into American living rooms by inviting ABC television network chairman of the board Elton Rule, Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters to Moscow.

A second report reflecting Kennedy's exchanges with the KGB about his desire to become president was found in the Soviet annals by Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, who published the report in the newspaper in February 1992.

Romerstein notes that Kennedy played a key role in the 1970s in placing restrictions on the FBI and CIA in their surveillance capabilities.

One wonders what the motivation for such actions may have been.

With a President Kerry, will Ted Kennedy again be calling the shots at the CIA and FBI? Can America take that risk?



It is no big secret that Ted Kennedy is the Political power behind Kerry's attempt to take the Whitehouse. Is there any doubt who would be pulling the strings, if Kerry wins this election? America's enemies, the people who want you dead and America destroyed are cheering for Kerry. And to me that says a lot!


Sources..


Free Republic (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1171176/posts)

Communist Party USA (http://cpusa.org/)

N8CPA
10-13-2004, 01:09 PM
I also find it interesting that so much Kerry footage lately has shown him playing football
--a transparent attempt to resonate memories of JFK. #I wonder if the wind surfing footage might be an attempt to evoke that classic John and Jackie at the helm clip, so popular on the History Channel. #But notice the absence of Scary Terrie on the surf board.

And remember! All the Als endorse Kerry--Al Gore,
Al Sharpton, Allen Colmes, Al Franken and al-Qaeda.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

N7AAO
10-13-2004, 02:08 PM
Quote[/b] (N8CPA @ Oct. 13 2004,06:09)]I also find it interesting that so much Kerry footage lately has shown him playing football
--a transparent attempt to resonate memories of JFK. #I wonder if the wind surfing footage might be an attempt to evoke that classic John and Jackie at the helm clip, so popular on the History Channel. #But notice the absence of Scary Terrie on the surf board.

And remember! #All the Als endorse Kerry--Al Gore,
Al Sharpton, Allen Colmes, Al Franken and al-Qaeda.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif
I think windsurfing is a wonderful metaphor for Senator Summit... he goes whichever way the wind blows! http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif

KB9YCO
10-13-2004, 02:39 PM
Well, there are a number of extremist religious and political organizations (no, I won't post links to them, figure it out on your own) that are endorsing the republican party as well. Does that mean that they represent the mainstream of the party? Does it mean that any of these groups represent anything close to the mainstream of either party? Hell, I'm starting to wonder if either party truly represents the mainstream of this country anymore anyway; so, trying to draw a parallel like this is just pointless. There are extremists in both directions endorsing the big two parties, it has nothing to do with the big two parties, or the people supporting them.

WF7I
10-13-2004, 03:38 PM
Quote[/b] (KB9YCO @ Oct. 13 2004,07:39)]Well, there are a number of extremist religious and political organizations (no, I won't post links to them, figure it out on your own)
Well, I found one for the "American Fascist Party", which has rhetoric that does sound an awful lot like stuff I hear on Limbaugh:

AFP (http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/4999/manifesto.html)

I like the part about all media being centrally controlled/monitored by the govt. Reminds me a lot of right-wing talk radio conglomerates and the Fox "news" channel efforts.

The point for me here is not to vote for radical elements of either party. The last thing we need is to overthrow democracy for a radical dictatorship! Free expression of ideas, especially those counter to the current administration, are essential.

kn6z
10-13-2004, 06:51 PM
Quote[/b] (KB9YCO @ Oct. 13 2004,07:39)]Well, there are a number of extremist religious and political organizations (no, I won't post links to them, figure it out on your own) that are endorsing the republican party as well.
No, you don't mean...you can't mean... Not the EVangelIcaLs?

Speaking of EVangelIcaLs, Jerry Falwell was interviewing another important EVangelIcaL leader (can't remember his name) on TV the other night. It was really great stuff. Facinating. About the problems with legislating morality. No political agenda, just really interesting discussion. Anyway, the interviewee kept calling Falwell, "Pat." Hilarious. Falwell never corrected him.

Now, for the Catholics. The Catholics support Bush, i.e., Kerry's church supports Bush. I guess that doesn't reflect well on Bush, somehow. Support from a Church that would have Kerry? I know, I'm being silly. But the Catholic Church is "damned" serious about supportingr Bush. From the 10/12 NY Times:

"Archbishop [Charles J. Chaput, the highest-ranking Roman Catholic prelate in Colorado] said a vote for a candidate like Mr. Kerry who supports abortion rights or embryonic stem cell research would be a sin that must be confessed before receiving Communion. 'If you vote this way, are you cooperating in evil?' he asked. 'And if you know you are cooperating in evil, should you go to confession? The answer is yes.'
Never before have so many bishops so explicitly warned Catholics so close to an election that to vote a certain way was to commit a sin. Less than two weeks ago, Archbishop Raymond L. Burke of St. Louis issued just such a statement. Bishop Michael J. Sheridan of Colorado Springs and Archbishop John J. Myers of Newark have both recently declared that the obligation to oppose abortion outweighs any other issue."

kb3cvo
10-13-2004, 09:16 PM
Quote[/b] (WF7I @ Oct. 13 2004,17:38)][quote=KB9YCO,Oct. 13 2004,07:39]
The point for me here is not to vote for radical elements of either party. #The last thing we need is to overthrow democracy for a radical dictatorship! #Free expression of ideas, especially those counter to the current administration, are essential.
Interesting you should say that. #Consider this from the Kerry campaign in reference to Sinclair broadcasting the anti-Kerry film:

...campaign spokesman Chad Clanton had warned, "Listen - they better look out there at Sinclair Broadcasting. ... They've stirred up a lot of hatred. ... I think they're going to regret doing this. They better hope we don't win."


This is very scary. #A political campaign threatening a broadcast company about possible backlash of them airing a program...not from citizens who may boycott, but from the Government. #Sounds like a flashback to 1933.[B]

AI4FR
10-13-2004, 10:51 PM
Quote[/b] ]Sounds like a flashback to 1933 Sure does!!