PDA

View Full Version : Nuisance


AI4FR
10-11-2004, 10:52 PM
If there is one word that could be used to describe terrorism... past, present, and future, that should galvanize both undecided AND decided voters as to which candidate would vigorously pursue the war on terror, then this is the word.

To describe terrorism as a nuisance, is to have a fundamental lack of understanding and judgment in how to deal with the most dangerous threat to confront the world since World War II.

To state that terrorism can be reduced to a nuisance level is beyond comprehension. What level of terrorism is acceptable? How many deaths per year would be acceptable? What factors would be weigh in deciding whether to take action? Cost? Troop casualties vs. civilian?

Will he be the one of ring the doorbell of the child's family that are killed in a nuisance attack?

Will he call the family members of those killed in the first World Trade Center bombing, or the Cole, or the embassies, and tell them that the pre-9/11 levels of terrorism were just a nuisance?

UNBELIEVABLE!


John Kerry: Terrorism to be a Nuisance (http://www.washingtondispatch.com/article_10284.shtml)



.

KB5WX
10-11-2004, 10:59 PM
The only way to deal with terrorists , is to kill every single one of them . No quarter , no mercy . They are cowards who prey on the innocent and helpless . They deserve nothing more than a bullet . # http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif

K7JBQ
10-11-2004, 11:09 PM
The next debate should be fun.
"Senator, would you define 'nuisance,' please?"

Just when Kerry actually had a bit of momentum going, this is an amazing gaffe.

73,
Bill

N7AAO
10-12-2004, 12:23 AM
Quote[/b] (AI4FP @ Oct. 11 2004,15:59)]The only way to deal with terrorists , is to kill every single one of them . No quarter , no mercy . They are cowards who prey on the innocent and helpless . They deserve nothing more than a bullet . http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif
Actually, I sort of doubt that we can kill ALL of them... but we sure as heck shouldn't treat them as a nuisance! What we need to do is to give them so much "shock and awe" that they wet themselves when they even think of attacking us.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif

KB5WX
10-12-2004, 01:44 AM
AAO ,

You are correct that we probably can't kill 'em all . However , if we kill enough of 'em , the rest will probably lay real low for a real long time . I still think we should hit them as hard and as often as we can .Taking NO Prisoners . No quarter to terrorists . No mercy to terrorists . Kill 'em where ya find 'em .

ai4ep
10-12-2004, 02:16 AM
uh...excuse me...therer are terrorists right here in the USA

Right in your state, your county, your city / town / community

There are boocoodles of folks who would just love for BAD things to occur, folks right here in the USA.

They are pissed at the city, the county, the cops, the establishment.

They are very very unhappy.

They have the money
They have the time

Some MIGHT even be amateur radio operators of one class or another.

Terrorists are NOT restricted to one class of individuals from a far away country.

Some might even be reading this message, in fact, all of the messages.

Some are LISTENING to you as YOU talk on your radio.

Some live near you, know your kids, might even WORK WITH YOU.

They go to wal-mart, just like you... they go to high school football games, some even go to CHURCH.

Some drive 18-wheelers, some are cops, some pick up aluminum cans along the roadside.

They are of every class, every color, every religion.

So HOW are YOU going to kill them all ?

ai4ep
10-12-2004, 03:56 AM
but then, YOU already knew that.

WA6CAW
10-12-2004, 05:51 AM
One at a time.......maybe? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif

K4JSR
10-12-2004, 06:56 AM
Quote[/b] (ai4ep @ Oct. 11 2004,19:16)]uh...excuse me...therer are terrorists right here in the USA

Right in your state, your county, your city / town / community

There are boocoodles of folks who would just love for BAD things to occur, folks right here in the USA.

They are pissed at the city, the county, the cops, the establishment.

They are very very unhappy.

They have the money
They have the time

Some MIGHT even be amateur radio operators #of one class or another.

Terrorists are NOT restricted to one class of individuals from a far away country.

Some might even be reading this message, in fact, all of the messages.

Some are LISTENING to you as YOU talk on your radio.

Some live near you, know your kids, might even WORK WITH YOU.

They go to wal-mart, just like you... they go to high school football games, some even go to CHURCH.

Some drive 18-wheelers, some are cops, some pick up aluminum cans along the roadside. #

They are of every class, every color, every religion.

So HOW are YOU going to kill them all ?
Push the button and let God sort it out!
Those guys give me a Jihad-ache. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif
I would love to show the Islamic Jihadists and all
socialists a "nuisance". A few hundred mushroom clouds
would be a nice start. If you blow away the mountains where Bin Ladin has Bin Layin', you wouldn't have to
worry about him anymore.
While I am a Southern boy, I do believe in what General
William T. Sherman said about war, "War is all hell. the
more hell the better and the sooner it will be over."
We in Georgia, while crying, "Forget Hell!", still seem to
be a fairly docile bunch since those days of yore.
Muslims will be docile also; If they don't really step up
to the front on terror and start putting a stop to it.
Liberals do not believe that when the Twin Towers and the Pentagon was attacked, World War IV was started.
The Cold War was WWIII. Just ask the dead on both sides of that conflict. Get a grip, folks!

Cal K4JSR

W0UZR
10-12-2004, 11:21 AM
Quote[/b] ]If there is one word that could be used to describe terrorism... past, present, and future, that should galvanize both undecided AND decided voters as to which candidate would vigorously pursue the war on terror, then this is the word.

To describe terrorism as a nuisance, is to have a fundamental lack of understanding and judgment in how to deal with the most dangerous threat to confront the world since World War II.

To state that terrorism can be reduced to a nuisance level is beyond comprehension. What level of terrorism is acceptable? How many deaths per year would be acceptable? What factors would be weigh in deciding whether to take action? Cost? Troop casualties vs. civilian?

Will he be the one of ring the doorbell of the child's family that are killed in a nuisance attack?

Will he call the family members of those killed in the first World Trade Center bombing, or the Cole, or the embassies, and tell them that the pre-9/11 levels of terrorism were just a nuisance?

UNBELIEVABLE!


John Kerry: Terrorism to be a Nuisance

See, every now and then, the real wishy washy part about Kerry leaks out...

NOW do you understand why I say that Kerry is a bad dangerous person to have in there??

And the next time we get attacked, Kerry will make sure he gets the blessing of the United Nations FIRST before he will protect the country!!!!!

You Kerry supporters,,Do you STILL really want him in there as president now?

K6UEY
10-12-2004, 11:37 AM
DRAT Boss,sorry I'm late for work, but those nuisance terrorist set off a bomb on the freeway and killed 500 people and caused a big traffic jam,boy they sure are a pesky nuisance. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif Some day some one is going to have the guts to tell them to stop.We wouldn't have this problem if GW was elected. # # #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

K6UEY
10-12-2004, 11:54 AM
Here is a thought sports fans,how about one of those pesky nuisances setting off a nuclear device at a world series game,or what about a Saturday Foot ball game,or your local college basketball playoffs.
How about for the Rose Bowl Half Time entertainment having one of those pesky nuisances's set off a WMD.

After all Sadamn didn't have any so there is nothing to worry about now. Maybe he depleted his supply selling them in the 12 year period that the UN was playing footsy with him and collecting oil kick backs!!We know AQ troops trained in IRAQ,and Bin Laden made several trips to Baghdad.
Enjoy the game and pay no attention to the pesky nuisance. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

W0UZR
10-12-2004, 12:20 PM
I was tempted to come up with something cute,,but I refuse to make jokes about these blanki-ity-blanks.

It should be OBVIOUS now what kind of importance that Kerry puts on terrorism.

People,,People,,People This election is going to be critical on having a stable person in there on important issues, and that's driven to follow through with this war.

HOW IMPORTANT IS YOUR SAFETY TO YOU?

K6UEY
10-12-2004, 12:33 PM
KBØUZR,
I think a lot of these people can not see what you are talking about,their view is blocked by their anal canal. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

W0UZR
10-12-2004, 01:00 PM
BWAHAHAHAHA

To me, that would be the ONLY good reason that they can't see how Kerry wouldn't make a good president.

ai4ep
10-12-2004, 01:30 PM
It aint real bad till it occurs in YOUR state, city / town / community.

It aint real bad until it occurs at YOUR work place, your street, your neighborhood.

It aint real bad till it happens to your kin folks, your friends, your immediate family.

When it strikes home is when it is real bad.

Vote for KERRY and it might, just might have a lot better chance of occurring to YOU.

go ahead, do it on November 2, 2004.

go on.

ai4ep
10-12-2004, 03:54 PM
that is right, tell them one more time...