View Full Version : U.S.Navy Wireless System Backs Up Olympic Security
w4lou
02-22-2002, 10:20 PM
Found this intesting article at the Ham radio Online site. I think this kind of thing can be used as an -eventually-replacing ARES/RACES or the emergency communcations function that the Amateur community provides.
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.hamradio-online.com/ #Published by Edward Mitchell, BSCS/MBA, KF7VY, kf7vy@amsat.org
Scroll down to Thursday Feb.14 "Of Interest"
The Navy has built (with more on the way) a rapid (or staged) humvee with extensive communication to be used during an emergency event.
Below is an excerpt of the aritcle Ed was writing about:
http://www.wirelessnewsfactor.com/perl/story/16337.html
"The U.S. Navy is providing a satellite-link backup system at the Salt Lake 2002 Winter Olympic Games to allow emergency communications to function in the event of a crisis.
About 70,000 daily visitors are expected at the Olympics, and most of them will probably have cell phones. Although Olympic organizers and their technology sponsors have worked to increase cell network capacity, a major emergency could see all communications networks overloaded as panicked civilians clog the same networks that emergency personnel must use.
As a backup, the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, D.C., has deployed a pilot vehicle as a mobile communications center in Summit County, the mountainous site of several Olympic events.
The Office of Naval Research supported the development of a Humvee outfitted with the capability of instantly providing two-way satellite commercial links, data networking, land-based mobile radio networking and a private cellular telephone network.
The Olympic Challenge
The system even handles streaming video. "We can deliver telephone and data connectivity anywhere," said Chris Herndon, the NRL project manager for InfraLynx (Infrastructure Linkage and Restoration), the Humvee
communications project."
I am suggesting for discussion that this is a "handrighting on the wall" event. Between the dwindling of our numbers and lack of John Q. Public even knowing we exist. Authorities will be excited about this. I wonder how many Fed/State/County/Municipality, Emergency Managers like this idea, especially as a replacement to Amateur Radio. I've read (even on QRZ) how new 800mhz system had authorities telling Hams, "Thanks for all you've done, now go away, we've got it under control now." Of course they ask us back after and "event" disables the fancy-smancy 20 million dollar systems, but its the prevailing attitude about hams that #government authorities have, I'm concerned about.
I would like some REALLY -positive suggestions- to short and long term thing any of us can do, not the usual "Everything is going downhill in the hobby because of this or that group, PLEASE!" comments
How'bout it people http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif
Louie, W4LOU
Jensen Beach, FL
WA4MJF
02-23-2002, 12:58 AM
Well, here in NC as in other sections the key is visability
to the EM personnel, Red Cross, Salvation Army, and
other customers. Even the Army National Guard uses us
to ride in their vehicles and provide commo sometimes,
as of course, most of their vehicles have no TOE
commo equipment mounted.
The USCG will helo our people onto the outer banks islands when necesary.
Our SEC is interfacin' with the MARS and CAP personnel
to integrate our systems.
I guess that if your section appointees do their jobs,
it will fall into place. Ours are constantly attendin' conferences, planin' meetin's, etc
The state built us a nice commo center at their forward
stagin' area. They fund equipment purchases, etc.
73 de Ronnie
KC7MAW
02-23-2002, 04:19 AM
Well, the Amateur Community will never be able to compete with that kind of capability. However, the Navy isn't going put one of those in every community either.
Fine Job by the Government for putting some resources at the games. I don't think your standard group of ACS/RACES guys with their 2M circuits are going to be much good to 70,000 people in such a concentrated area if a crisis hits.
It's a tough one for Hams though. Society is becoming increasingly more reliant on technology and in an emergency will need it to function. As amateurs, we need to be able to fill that need. When all the Lans go down, how can we help restore some connectivity. I'm not a whiz at Lan's or wireless data transfer, but it appears that we need to be able to establish some kind of wireless Local Area Network (I.P. based) with work stations at each ECC in your typical county. And perhaps be able to link one of those stations with the internet in the nearest un-affected area. Now we're talking expertise and financial resources beyond many of your typical hams.
Very Tough Problem.
73
Mike
kq6ha
02-23-2002, 04:35 AM
At least two RACES organizations in my experience had vehicles--a camp trailer in one case and motorhome in the other--that were rigged with multi-mode communications capabilites. I'm sure nobody ever considered the possibility of trying to compete with the Navy for complexity, but the principle is the same. I join the other ham who applauded them for making that level of capability available where it is needed!
This may serve to deminish our roll in very large events planed months if not years in advance. However, the navy nor anynoe else can "plan" earthquakes, tornados, lost children, etc. even five minutes in advnce, much less far enough in advance to deploy der vunder hummer or a row boat for that matter.
I don't feel threatened by anything the burocrocy does if for no other reason than it's collective attention span. If the Navy can come up with a workable system for large events or what ever,well , more power to 'em. Don't see tripping over der vunder hummer at the next quake or flood here in N.W. WA. and we have plenty of Navy to trip over here now.
On the up side, I hope they can work something out. You can't have too many real opptions at a real emergency.
73 de Craig........KC0GOA
KG4PYX
02-23-2002, 10:41 AM
I find the Navy's capacity interesting, especially mounted in a HumVee. Seems they would need quite a bit of equipment just to assist with the cell phone problem. I work in Electronic Warfare in the Army, albeit some years ago, and our comhuts were in 1-ton trucks or 2 1/2-ton trucks due to the equipment needed. As far as the states, counties and smaller divisions of government getting these new jewels, not likely soon. If there is only one now, production is some time away. Initial expense is going to be high with an economy that is skewed. Our concern becomes valid down the road when these units become surplus military equipment. When that happens, we just step up to EMA and say, "look at this neat equipment that the HAMS can come in and operate for you if you can get one." I think we have nothing to worry about.
Chris, KG4PYX
KC7MAW
02-23-2002, 11:11 AM
Well my friend, the problem comes in when we say (in the future) that "We can operate it".
I'm in the Navy Submarine Service 16 years and counting (Communications ETCS(SS) ) and I don't see hams ever coming along making that claim......... Maybe so.... But this stuff ever ending up in the surplus market and actually being applicable(when it does) is something I don't ever see.
For this event (Olympics, that is), consider the National Climate, I'm sure that resources were set aside (SATCOM) that normally aren't available and definitely won't ever be surplus!!!
Big events will enjoy similar support like this in the future (Times have changed.....New Cabinet posit for Homeland security)
The set-up in UTAH was probablly quite capable and would likely blow the socks off all of us combined.
However, as has been said......... They won't be and can't be, at every disaster.......... We still can provide much needed support.....
Wouldn't it be nice, if we as a Ham community, are ready and able to transmit/relay (Wireless if need be) an extensive Excel spreadsheet (outlining damage assesments) to D.C.
Now with that kind of capability we are very usefull and invaluable .................... and we will get and keep the attention of the folks who make decisions about our future as a Ham Community.
There has to be a way to make Amateurs proficient at an evolution like that.
Anyway, My second post on this topic so I'll bow out gracefully
73
Mike
K1FDD
02-23-2002, 11:45 AM
Similar systems are all over. New Hampshire has 3 Federal Government radio systems that weigh about 75lbs and are a bit bigger than your standard 2m Repeater. The multi channel system will "patch" any frequency to any frequency on VHF Low, High, UHF & 800Mhz (incl. Moto & EDACS trunked). The system is all controlled by computer & also includes multi-phone line capabilities. It's basically a Dispatch Center on a dolly. This system is run by local agencies and can also do 2m/440.
Also consider the "Response Time" of the Federal Government to any major incident. Even with recent events, the first 24-Hours of any incident is handled by local agencies (& their communications systems). And 72-Hours is the standard response time for a "Team" response to anything. Usually the communications are setup in the72-Hour window.
Therefore, hams will still be needed in whatever capacity they were before, especially as local systems become more high-tech (& more easily taken down by it's own technology). There's always need to show to the public the things ARES/RACES can provide. It will be difficult at times because as newer technology is "Sold" to public safety agencies, these agencies think they're "All Set" But as it was said before they'll be looking for help when their system fails. "BE READY"
John Marcel/K1FDD
Concord, NH Fire Dispatch
www.KVF642.com
w1ppy
02-23-2002, 12:55 PM
A great article, wasn't it ?
'course, I'm a sailor (and a comm operator, ta boot)
so I'm prejudiced ...
I found it fascinating that they are FINALLY applying, what for most of us amateurs is, common technology.
Granted, for a much greater purpose than we usually do, sitting in our shacks tinkering with these things.
(Altho, I don't know about you, but that's how I learn, not having much of an educational bidget these days !http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Didn't you find it fascinating ? Error free bit rate, 'live' feed from/to anywhere, mobility, independance ?
Yeah, but...
When they talk about streaming video on the internet, (whatever kind of 'net it is, copper or plastic or "ether")or to some "bird" up in the sky, I think:==ATV/SSTV==; their data streaming is ==packet/PSK...and geez, didn't we requisition the RTTY stuff we've got, FROM them ?; Oh, and not to forget the ever-present, aforementioned ==2/220/440/1296 HTs==in cars and jacket pockets and wheel chairs and bicycles, EVEN WALKING AROUND !
As for the Humvee...one if by land, two if by sea: a '73 picktruck; a VW microbus; a pop-up caravan, generator purrrrring in the distance...or out on your "yacht" - didn't I see a picture of a vertical mounted on a Hobie cat on a lake, in QST ? : ) or on the world's biggest ground plane, did I mention that rarer bird, the aeronautical mobile ?
As I see it, the Boys in Blue saw this was an excellant opportunity for training, and they took it. And whether that was the reason, or the scenario, I'm glad they are using this opportunity to deploy and test these systems (that we've ALL paid for)
<Heaven forbid> we need them some day...ANY day...
Tho I fear we will...
Well, since I'm up here talking, thank you, I'll say this:
Maybe we should take this to Field Day this year and see what WE CAN DO.
Once again, another excellant opportunity for training presents itself.
Training for them, training FOR US.
We can track our own sattelites ! Sheeesh, we can track the SPACESTATION !!!
One (and more !http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif of our famliy is crewin' up there !!!
Could we be MORE INVOLVED ?
And for Pete's sake, get some local kids to come out to your comm site; wherever it is ! Give them some adventure; something to get their attention; something to talk about...Give a quick show & tell at a nearby school <NOW> so they can incoporate some real math, science, language, etc, into the classroom right up til The Day they get to go On The Air !
GET STARTED !
Then get these future hams operatin' ! Arcin' & Sparkin' -(well, hopefully not that ...)
Oh, and there are extra points for it, in case You Contesters are worried about expending resources and missing out on the BIG PRIZE...)
Come out of that shack and share, and show off, and show these public administrators that when the gov't won't GIVE them ANY of this gear, THIS YEAR,or any other soon, they're STILL going to be relying on us, like they have been,
and most importantly,
THAT THEY CAN .
Thank you and Good DX,
Chris #8 )
[/B] http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif
KG4ROL
02-24-2002, 12:29 AM
This is interesting project that they are doing. #But, I do agree that we are still needed when there is a disaster that takes place, or our local/state/federal agency needs us. #Just think this equipment will not be able to go in every square inch of this Earth. What happends if there is a important part that breaks down and they can't get the part for it for a few days. #What will happend then. #They will ask us to help out. #But, if we break a part on a radio we can go to local store (for example: Radio Shack or Circuit City or even Home Depot). #We can be back up and running within a day. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
Just think we will not be on the porch and watch the big boys. #We will be out there with the big boys still and not on the porch.
KG4ROL AND 73
ornurse362
02-24-2002, 07:53 PM
Great article, in an intellectual sense. Just a couple comments though:
1. There is a ham radio presence at the 2002 Olympic Games.
2. Local ARES and RACES were involved in planning.
3. Almost anything can be done if you have seven years to plan and implement it, with a great deal of resources, and where non-accomplishment is not an option. No sour grapes here, just an observation on the nature of major scheduled events.
4. I would anticipate increased Federal (multiple agency) and DOD support for future "national security events", ie., all kinds of sporting events and get- togethers of large crowds.
5. As others have already mentioned, there are insufficient high-tech assets pre-positioned around the country for 'unscheduled' events such as natural disasters and the more local assemblies of people. The ham radio community needs to maintain its visibility and its perceived value to local emergency services. I hope these local agencies do not get blinded by the glamour of ultra-high tech and feel that "amatuers" are not needed any longer.
D.
Utah
You may want to take a look at what is being done in some areas of the U.S. at
#http://members.aol.com/emcom4hosp/
with digital radio communications.
#73, #Bob
kc0adp
02-25-2002, 12:32 AM
Here we were workign with the authorities with their 800Mhz system but our sectin manager said not to. When asked why, I was told to shut up, do what I was told to do or else..... Still waiting on the "or else".
BeenThere
02-25-2002, 01:26 AM
You know, the one great thing about VOLUNTEERS??
They are there because they care and WANT to help.
The other important aspect?
You do NOT have to PAY volunteers. A concept our government sometimes forgets.
Not all problems can be solved with money and technology - especially under circumstances where an unexpected disaster occurs. Hams are EVERYWHERE.
KC7MAW
02-25-2002, 04:38 AM
I really do not ever see the local radio shack as being of ANY help...... Maybe you've got a good store.....But the personnel at our store don't even understand resistance........
They're just looking for a commission and it doesn't matter if you buy what you need...they just need you to buy...
73
Mike
k7myr
02-25-2002, 05:48 AM
Well people,
Did anyone think that Ham radio, with it's 1940's phone capability and RTTY/CW mentality, would EVER be able to compete with modern communications? There are still people that think we should still be testing for Morse code proficiency! We'll have to get out of the 19th century before we can ever get into the 21st century.
If we don't.....well, I'm 48 years old and I'm young as hams go, If we don't figure out a way to attract YOUNG people to this hobbie there probably won't be a ham radio in the future. And that's not far away boys and girls!
73/Rick Myr
W7MYR
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (W7MYR @ Feb. 24 2002,22:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well people,
Did anyone think that Ham radio, #with it's 1940's phone capability and RTTY/CW mentality, #would EVER be able to compete with modern communications? # There are still people that think we should still be testing for Morse code proficiency! #We'll have to get out of the 19th century before we can ever get into the 21st century.
If we don't.....well, #I'm 48 years old and I'm young as hams go, If we don't figure out a way to attract YOUNG people to this hobbie there probably won't be a ham radio in the future. #And that's not far away boys and girls!
73/Rick Myr
W7MYR[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
You know, it's kind of intersting, reading all the posts about this issue.
I was in "Comm" in the "Corps" in the 70s.
"I" knew everything there was to know. ( I really did...I was good)
[So I thought]
I have, after all these years decided to become a Ham.
You can look at the posts, and decide there is no future in ham radio, or you can do as one of the first posts shows, and become a part of the local effort to show what ham radio can do. YES Ham radio is fun...Yes Ham radio is legal..BUT... If we ( and I admit "I" don't have the right to say this yet) don't wake up to the fact that the "Gov." ( Navy) or otherwise, has no reason to trust any non military unit to "protect" the "Gov." interests, we are going to be left out in the cold.
#Packet is not the Internet. Code is not as easy as speech. Yes we need some upgrade in our thinking, but not to the extent we throw away our roots.
I thought I knew all there was to know about communication on radio. I was wrong. Yes, I am only taking my Tech. test, but because of code requirements I am studying to take General. Please do not "water down" { or worse " dumb down" } my efforts, or why don't I say "to heck with you" and become a "freebander"??(whatever you make that mean)..
Yes we need to make "kids" intrested in this hobby, but you know, my kids enjoy rules, enjoy having to work for their rewards....
You know something really funny?... So do I.
Sorry for using so much bandwidth,
- Joe
kc5fm
02-25-2002, 01:28 PM
Some of you seem to think that during a disaster is the time to convince your local EMA that your gizmos are going to save the day.
Wrong.
NOW is the time to come to the aid of your community. #Approach your local EMA now with your communications capabilities. #Show them (on paper) what you can bring to the table. #Don't rely on flash and whistles. #Get your team together now and be able to explain how many operators are available to operate 24/7 over how long a time.
You will rarely operate that long. #As one poster noted, 72 hours would be a reasonable amount of time before help arrived (now you know why EMA stresses a three-day supply of stuff).
Do you want to do shelter communications? #Do you want to do a damage assessment team? #Do you want to link all the police departments in the County together? #
Show me you have the manpower and the equipment to do it. #Show me you have the determination, perserverance, and stamina to do it.
When you are written into the ECOM plan, then you better show up, even for drills.
Lloyd Colston, KC5FM
Mayes County Oklahoma EMA
kc5fm
02-25-2002, 01:49 PM
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (w4lou @ Feb. 22 2002,15:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I wonder how many Fed/State/County/Municipality, Emergency Managers like this idea, especially as a replacement to Amateur Radio. I've read (even on QRZ) how new 800mhz system had authorities telling Hams, "Thanks for all you've done, now go away, we've got it under control now." Of course they ask us back after and "event" disables the fancy-smancy 20 million dollar systems, but its the prevailing attitude about hams that #government authorities have, I'm concerned about.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Here is one local fellow who won't ask you to leave in order to ask you back.
I think there may be a shift to more MARS activity at the local area. #For more information about MARS, see http://www.navymars.org (there are links to the other services). #
I, personally, will use Amateur Radio Operators, IF they show up AND IF they have indicated their willingness to be used beforehand.
Because of workman's compensation insurance issues, I would like an application completed BEFORE the disaster strikes. #This is more for your protection than mine.
I keep my door open. #Care to walk in?
Lloyd Colston, KC5FM
Mayes County Oklahoma EMA
http://www.geocities.com/mccem
w4lou
02-25-2002, 02:47 PM
Great Comments!
I believe we must rise up to the challenge and do everything we can to promote that we exist, and what we bring to The Table.
We here have setup display tables at several communittee events at local malls. The best one is the hurricane fair in early June, were we are in between storm shutter salepeople. We always get a few tablebrowsers to go through the Tech classes we teach at the EOC and promote citizens to come out to participate Field Day (the interaction between Ctrl Ops and guests are great, the contest scores are nice but secondary to us).
We are also blessed that our County Emergency Mgr. is very supportive of ARES/RACES (even funding complete jump kits). I just know other groups have it tougher. Unfortunately they have to work harder.
Even though, we continue work hard at awareness because we noticed the "handrighting on the wall" a long time ago and will continue aggresive promotion. This year we are moving our Field Day operation (last year we were parked next to a popular boat launch ramp in county park) to an even more visible site (a new popular county park). Next year we may move it again. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
Let have some more suggestions as to what your group is doing that is working for your area.
73's de W4LOU
Louie, Jensen Beach, FL
kb1flr
02-25-2002, 04:11 PM
Well, the Navy Humvee solution sounds interesting, but I thought that one of our greatest strengths as hams was that we have no single point of failure. If a problem occurred at the games and the Humvee was rendered inoperative, we would still be able to communicate.
I'm just glad nothing happened. We needed to show the world that we could pull off something as big as the Olympics without any danger to the public.
73 de KB1FLR, Rick
n3wjl
02-25-2002, 06:03 PM
A fewe years back FEMA had a drill here in Pittsburgh PA. along with the local EMS and Police. FEMA brough in a portable VHF repeater to use but it didn't work! Unlike the FEMA reapeater that sits around for a year or more unused in a warehouse our HAM repeaters are used everyday. Even if one of our HAM repeaters was down there are other that can cover the same area. We don't have that single point of failure.
Most agencies such as the Red Cross and county/local EMS, Fire and Police don't have the money to create a moblie communications center such as the Navy one.
Our roll may be reduced but I still think there is a use for HAMS.
N3WJL
High-tech also means "high-dollar" and you won't find the Navy providing these to communities and, you will certainly not find communities jumping on the bandwagon to buy them! #In fact, savvy, experienced emergency management people understand the viability of basic point-to-point communications (that's us) during emergencies. #
This was a good test for this equipment but, it is designed for critical situations including combat or overseas military actions, not for disaster situations. #By the time this piece of equipment is made available and is transported to the site, an emergency is well under control and it's services won't be needed any longer. #
Don't sing the "doomsday" song for ham radio any too soon. #The new 800MHz system will take years to put in place and not all areas are going to fork over taxpayer $$$ to do that until forced into it. #Even then, all that does is means the federal agencies can communicate with state and local agencies, much as they do now except less efficiently.
Bottom line is that ham radio volunteers, however fewer their numbers may be, are still their best bargain. Money doesn't just 'happen' for emergency management and preparedness and mitigation usually take a back seat to other needs in local government. #Mandating 'high-tech' doesn't work because the fed's don't control local revenue. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
rwmcgwier
02-26-2002, 02:58 AM
Here in the NYC area, during 911 and in the deep south during the floods, nothing but amateur radio worked correctly for days. #The cell phones just did not work in lower Manhattan for days because of loss of infrastructure. #Amateur radio did loads of logistics work in support of the early rescue operations and passing of health and welfare traffic, etc. #I spent time right next to the rubble ordering food, blankets, and rest areas for rescue workers. #Later, as Verizon managed to bring in portable cell towers, we were gradually replaced. # There is a place for all the fancy technology you mention and there is a place for good 'ole volunteers. #The only thing we did wrong at the Winter Olympics was to fail to crank up the P.R. machinery as well as the Navy did.
Bob N4HY
N0YVW
02-26-2002, 01:04 PM
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ornurse362 @ Feb. 24 2002,12:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Something that we tend to forget is that as radio amateurs, we are part of a total solutions package, not the sole solution. #Our strength lies in our availability to be first responders.
For example, in this situation, the US NAVY has the expertise, the resources, and the ability to station one or more communications teams in Salt Lake City for emergency communications. #How many amateurs could have afforded to take just the 17 days of the actual Olympics (not to mention pre- and post-Olympic needs) off work? #Not I! #And probably not you, either.
On the flip side, how quickly do you think the US NAVY can get that Hummer to a disaster site? #Not very!
Just something to think about.
ornurse362
02-26-2002, 08:26 PM
Not meaning to start a flame war here, but .....
For example, in this situation, the US NAVY has the expertise, the resources, and the ability to station one or more communications teams in Salt Lake City for emergency communications. #
Again as I said, almost anything is possible when there is seven years to plan, virtually unlimited resources, and failure is not an option.
How many amateurs could have afforded to take just the 17 days of the actual Olympics (not to mention pre- and post-Olympic needs) off work?
Right off the top of my head, I can name about 20 amateurs who were deeply involved in SLC 2002 planning, starting more than year ago. #During the Olympics, there were approximately 125 amateur operators working at the venues, 24/7.
Not I! #And probably not you, either.
You are correct. #I myself only worked 12 of the 17 days.
D.
Utah
w8jsa
02-27-2002, 01:54 AM
I used to do that kind of EMCOMM work when I was in the military. Most of it was to show that we had the resources but we cerntainly did have the manpower to handle a long term situation like WTC towers, etc. Many of you probably didn't hear that the USAF is beefing up the HF circuits. The fear is that satellites can be taken out as well as the ground stations.
Gentlemen (and Ladies) I don't see anything to worry about. I just wish I could have been there to see the latest in comms toys.
kc2hcl
02-27-2002, 01:57 AM
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (KC7MAW @ Feb. 22 2002,21:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well, the Amateur Community will never be able to compete with that kind of capability. However, the Navy isn't going put one of those in every community either.
Fine Job by the Government for putting some resources at the games. I don't think your standard group of ACS/RACES guys with their 2M circuits are going to be much good to 70,000 people in such a concentrated area if a crisis hits.
It's a tough one for Hams though. Society is becoming increasingly more reliant on technology and in an emergency will need it to function. As amateurs, we need to be able to fill that need. When all the Lans go down, how can we help restore some connectivity. I'm not a whiz at Lan's or wireless data transfer, but it appears that we need to be able to establish some kind of wireless Local Area Network (I.P. based) with work stations at each ECC in your typical county. And perhaps be able to link one of those stations with the internet in the nearest un-affected area. Now we're talking expertise and financial resources beyond many of your typical hams.
Very Tough Problem.
73
Mike[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
With the price of wireless networking gear at such an affordable level (with prices still dropping), and 2.4ghz antennae so inexpensive and simple to homebrew; The restoration of network connectivity at least is well within our reach. Many non-hams responded in just this very manner during 911. see http://www.nycwireless.net for more info.
-73 de KC2HCL
KC4YDY
02-27-2002, 05:02 PM
The stuff that the military is using has been around for a long time.... #Technology has just made
the equipment compact enough to enable it to be installed in a humvee instead of a duece & a half
truck.... #Even 15 years ago the Army had me jumping out of perfectly good airplanes with portable
SATCOM equipment.... #I now build news vehicles for a living, and we are putting digi satellite dishes
on VANS instead of having to put them on a truck frame.... #3 video paths and 12 audio paths in
what used to take a full-size SNV truck, all in an E-350 van.... #
I don't think that Amateur Radio has any threats except from the apathy within, the lack of interest
in recruiting new Hams, and the lack of self-promotion.... #
John Q. Public is so hyped up on new wireless communications abilities, but the common Joe Smhuck
does not realize that all his cool toys will be USELESS when those ugly cellular towers become
"horizontally polarized", that is, laying on their sides! #I worked for 2 weeks after hurricane Andrew
plowed across Florida, and when I left, there were still HUGE areas that my car-mounted cellphone
(3-watt w/ external 5dB antenna) did not work. #On the other hand, I was able to throw a dipole up
into what was left of a tree and communicate very reliably with my portable ham equipment.
The humvee, or any other military-controlled communications system will be at best 2-3 days
behind whatever disaster may occur. #Amateur Radio operators can be set up and on the air in a
matter of minutes/hours (it took me longer to drive from Port Charlotte, FL to Homestead than it
did for me to set up and establish my first contact on the emergency nets).
Emergency communications is just that, communications set up in an emergency. #Organizations like
the Navy, Army, NatGuard, FEMA, are just not set up, prepared, or equipped to do things "on the
fly", or in a matter of minutes. #They have their bureaucracy's to deal with, and those things take
time....
Anyway, just my nickle's worth!
73 de Paul, KC4YDY
NNNN
docmurphy
02-27-2002, 08:02 PM
I’m extremely pleased to see the Navy utilizing our dollars. #It only makes sense that after September 11, at minimum I expect, as a taxpayer, to see an operation no less secure then what the Navy displayed at the games. #Actually, I’m quite surprised that this information was even disseminated to the public.
In our new world we face uncertainties and risks, risks that cannot be taken. #I don’t believe government officials were trying to send us any message, I believe they were taking American interests and those of the international community and fitting them to the proper scenario.
I’m not implying that we as hams are not capable of operating such equipment. #I am simply stating that our licenses as amateurs do not provide proper security screening for that particular task.
However, may I reiterate, that emergency management officials, no matter how elaborate there systems are, they will never equivocate to the cunning ingenuity and fast reaction of the ham. #
For example:
During our darkest hours on September 11 one swift ham recorded the emergency response system of the Port Authority in New York. #By scanning the airways he caught on record the audible reactions of the brave souls who responded to that tragedy. Transmissions from police, fire, and rescue personnel were fortified to not only the ears of the every policymaker in the United States, but to those of the world. #Compiling this audio with the horrifying footage, taken by news crews, solidified the resolve of every policymaker and American to wage all out war on terrorism.
So in certain arenas amateur radio operators may find themselves excluded by government officials and new security measures but, overall when push comes to shove, they are darned glad we exist. #
73s
Murf
KB9UKO
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
N2QGV
03-03-2002, 01:52 PM
"""I am suggesting for discussion that this is a "handrighting on the wall" event."""
IT'S ALL JUST GRAFITI
I believe the "handrighting" is that everyone wanted to get involved in a World Wide High Profile One Time Event that began and ended at specific times. Navy had to do something and someone found some budgeted funds. Not many bases and ships in those mountains. That Navy Humvee is now sitting around in a navy yard. Vehicle will soon be hauling garbage or something, and equipment will be installed back into fixed building it was borrowed from. If lucky, some Recruiter may have it for a while to Wow some people into signing up. This type of equipment or concept is not new to armed forces. Don't think National Guard has the budget to supply and maintain enough equipment to be of much use in unplanned emergency. Heck, the N.G. was lying about weekend personnel training numbers to keep the funds flowing.
I have two questions to throw into the mix.
1. How many Humvees would be needed for Federal, State, Local government agency support, along with all the humanitarian associations when the next hurricane Andrew roars across Florida? (Remember every town, city, county agency has lost communication ability, buildings, equipment, and even some personnel. There is no work place to go to even if workers had transportation and were able to get there.)
2. Assuming that every government entity had their own Navy Humvee, how many technicians and support personnel would the Navy have to supply?
I believe you may see that any Humvee's will only show up at high profile (lots of media) locations and perform it's primary and only function, to support Federal agencies. You know the Governor may need one, wonder if he belongs to the correct political party?
Bottom line, there are many different types of communication needs based on the type and size of a disaster. ARES/RACES is written into almost every state and local disaster plan. There will always be more need than the available supply of ARES/RACES assistance and licensed operators.
GET INVOLVED, you may enjoy it.
[U]
ornurse362
03-03-2002, 05:55 PM
Just some more fuel for the fire .........
At the Utah VHF Society annual meeting on March 2, I spoke with a local ham who had been involved in the technical planning for comm support at the SLC Winter Olympic Games. #He was also on a traveling tech team. #He had some familiarity with this HMMWV-mounted comm unit:
(1) #As configured, it did not work and needed some "tweaking" to get it operational (I have no further info on this).
(2) #As configured, this unit was not intended to be a replacement for a general public cellphone site. #It was/is intended to support relatively few cellphones for emergency ops in a fairly well delineated area. #There were options for connectivity to POTS though.
(3) #The wide area and multiple venues of the SLC Winter Olympics really required several of these units.
************************************************
My additional, primarily gratuitous comments:
(1) #Is this a solution looking for a problem to solve?
(2) #IF (big 'if' there) this HMMWV-mounted comm site is to be included in local emergency ops, there needs to be a "concept of operations" on what it can or will do.
(3) #Will this drive standardzation between frequencies and systems across the country? #I recall my GLCM time in Germany (1985+)...we AF folks could not directly communicate with Army units in the field except through SATCOMM or just by driving down the road for a face-to-face.
(4) #There are a myriad other problems associated with using a non-standard vehicle. #I mean, who is going to drive it, and safely I might add. #HMMWVs are more difficult to turn over, but it can be done and IS done fairly frequently. #Also, WHEN there is a mechanical failure, who will fix it and with what parts?
I don't disagree that this technology can be great in a major operation (national security event, natural disaster, "unnatural" disaster), where local, state, and federal resources are mobilized for an event of relatively long duration. #It cannot, though, be just dropped off so to speak; prior integration with local resources is mandatory. (Duh! #I do have a flair for stating the obvious.)
There are no insurmountable problems with integrating ANYTHING into local emergency ops, but ya gotta have the time, money, resources, and most importantly, the will to do it. # If this is to be the future, I think the most logical place to preposition these assets would be with a state's National Guard unit(s). #I do not know how politically or economically palatable that would be though.
D.
w4awm
03-05-2002, 03:52 AM
Wait until the terrorists come up with a neutron device. Only the boatanchor collectors will be able to get on the air. Why do you think the Russians still use tubes in some of their communications gear? It is not because they don't have the technology!
73, W4AWM
KB5YQH
03-07-2002, 06:26 PM
I think (hope) the future of ARES/RACES/MARS, etc is bright. The rage these days seems to be homeland defense. This poses significant challenges to the military - most of which are legal. We in the USA are not ready (nor should we be) for our soldiers to be policing our streets. Civilain agencies are the american way - the troops should be reserved for operations outside the borders (my opinion). The trouble is that we NEED to integrate our internal (civilian) security with our external (military) security to combat this sophisticated, global threat. The recent tragedy at Fort Bragg, NC proves it's broken. MAJ Bob Butts, US Army - KB5YQH
kc5nbl
03-07-2002, 11:06 PM
I really wouldn't worry about this too much. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for the military services has had eight of these vehicles for a number of years. All were prototypes, built by GTE and a few others, specifically for special purpose missions where larger military satellite and switching equipment wasn't ideal. They have seen action in all parts of the world and are a very valuable asset for our military. They are very expensive and require a number of specially trained folks to operate and maintain.
The wireless part is new but since it's inception, they have possessed the capability to provide email, video teleconference, Internet access, and enough regular "land line" phones for a small town. It takes the crew of six or so less than four hours to get it operational. America should be proud. # #
73,
# #KC5NBL
KC7RAF
03-12-2002, 01:32 PM
As a Ham VOLUNTEER to the UOPSC (Utah Olympic Public Safety Command) as a Communications Specialist (I do possess other credentials besides being a Ham) I would like to add a comment or two.
The InfraLynx van and personnel appeared in the Utah area a week or so prior to the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. The staff offered the services of the van should the need arise. As far as I know, no one in the UOPSC requested nor funded bringing the van and personnel to 'play' during the games. A situation arose in the Park City area that pointed up a need to beef up the communications at one of the non-competition venue sites. This required providing interoperability between the local law enforcement dispatch using the statewide 800 MHz trunked radio system, the temporary network of perimeter protection officers using VHF DoD analog radios and several Federal law enforcement special management teams using VHF digital radios. Knowing beforehand that the InfraLynx van had a JPS ACU-1000 interoperability box aboard, my UOPSC boss inquired if the InfraLynx personnel would like to 'play' rather than just cooling their heels in an area parking lot. They, of course, jumped at the opportunity.
The InfraLynx van is an impressive collection of communications equipment but this particular application was not a good fit for its capabilities. The only VHF radio available in the van suffered a failure during programming for operation on one of the required frequencies. The 800 MHz trunkable radio was not 'registered' into the statewide law enforcement trunked radio system and to do so would have required removing the custom mounted radio, taking it to Salt Lake City and returning it to the Park City area (about a 120 mile round trip) and a batch of paper work. Portable radios and JPS cables were provided by the various agencies and these were connected to the JPS ACU-1000 in the van. Ultimately, the van was used but only as an expensive house for 3 portable radios and a JPS interoperability box that had to be unracked in order to attach the different radios. We could as easily have taken one of our 5 spare ACU-1000 units on hand and placed it and the portable radios in the Park City office building and saved several days of diesel fuel burned by the van during it's 'inservice' period. Hopefully however, the personnel gained some insight as to possible uses and improvements that would make the van more flexible.
My point in all the above rambling is that the InfraLynx van has a LOT of capability but not as much flexibility as this particular need required.
On the Ham side, I would also add that approximately 200 Utah Ham volunteers provided their time and capabilities to all of the Olympic competition and non competition venue sites as well as various special management and agency command centers fulfilling many duties within the command centers at the request of Federal and State law enforcement agencies. They also stood by to provide back up communication should the various agency communication systems have been catastrophically interrupted. We also served side by side on technical support teams with Secret Service and military technicians. This was part of the overall security communications plan from its inception. For the Ham community to have been asked to fill such a role by Secret Service, FBI and military personnel was precedence setting to say the least, We hope we made the most of that opportunity. Management level personnel of the FBI, the Secret Service, the DoD, the Utah State Department of Public Safety and venue security commanders have gone out of their way to personally thank the Hams for our participation and assistance. We have been told that our presence contributed to the overall success of providing a safe and secure theater for the 2002 Olympic Winter games.
Is amateur radio a dying breed, as some in this thread have indicated? It will be if we sit back and wring our hands and atrophy by not embracing new technologies while honing the skills we have learned over the years. Only by being professional in our capabilities and continuing to demonstrate and offer our services and skills will we, as a community of communicators, be able to make a difference when emergencies arise.
Thanks for the loan of the soap box.
73 to all de KC7RAF